Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "The Rubin Report"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PHeMoX European nations never enshrined free speech as a right. In different places, people may speak more or less freely, by custom, but the government can snatch it away at the government's pleasure. The U.S. government is the ONLY government in the WORLD that is explicitly constrained from infringing on the right to speak freely and voice your dissent, and the U.S. government chafes at the restriction and has done everything possible to control speech, without being caught doing it.
The Twitter Files show beyond a doubt that the U.S. government regularly censors the news on Big Tech and legacy media alike. There's no way they wouldn't ALL behave exactly as Twitter, FaceBook, the New York Times, cable news, and report the exact same things, with the exact same wording, inclusions and omissions if it weren't all coming from one place.
I'm done giving the benefit of the doubt. Any lack of transparency. Any redaction. Any suppression of stories. Any de-platforming of critics and dissidents. I'm just done. I am henceforth assuming that every bit of corporate-sponsored media are lying. I assume that any media for children published in the last 10 years is something I wouldn't want my kids to watch, until proven otherwise.
In the words of a system administrator: Hosts Deny: All is the default until personally vetted by me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mix of truth and lies. There ARE oil magnates with politicians on speed dial. You might be surprised how deeply embedded in the Green New Deal they are, managing its wording so that they can take maximum advantage of government subsidies and keep millions of small projects from ever getting STARTED, by controlling the regulations that will come with it. "We're going to have to take down your windmill, ma'am, because it doesn't have wheelchair-accessible entrance" or some shit like that.
That's the main reason I oppose Green New Deal, because I think the CULTURE is going green faster than a handful of eggheads in industry and government can even keep up with, and the last people we want in charge of how the changes are made are idiots like AOC, following the advice of the "experts" who are most accessible (and generous) to them. Arguably the biggest obstacle to EarthShip construction principles is government regulators. The guys preaching to us about environment are the same guys who won't let you build more green-conscious in an organic way.
No. To THEM it means a more efficient gas furnace hooked to their grid. A cracker-box wood-frame construction on top of the ground that's so tight you breathe your own effluvia. Can't have a house that breathes. You need to buy disposable air filters from an outfit in China...
Green tech and living in balance with nature is a ground-up phenomenon, and the people on the ground can share their successes and failures, INSTANTLY, with other people just like themselves, across broad spans of climate, altitude, culture, and resource settings, informally, over the Internet. We need more Kirsten Dirksen's, not more government programs that are just big money-makers for the people writing the fine print and first in line for the benefits.
The internal combustion engine is a fantastic asset to humanity. But driving 40 miles to work every day in a car is just a stupid way to live. People are figuring that out, but you don't need to punish them or use force on them. Living greener is already seen as a "good" in this culture, so let it play out!
And when I hear "shovel-ready" out of a politician's mouth, I about blow a gasket laughing and crying at the same time. They're the last people we want deciding how to clean things up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Parallels between U.S. and Iran:
Antifa/anti-trump rallies are starting to draw more trumpsters than protesters. In ultra-liberal Oregon, police are routinely arresting roadblock protests. College presidents, who've been playing the game ONE way to protect their institutions from litigation-happy students and government mandates, are suddenly faced with dropping enrollments and smaller contributions from alumni.
I think if you talked to an Iranian about what's going on in Iran, they'd say some of it was probably upset over prices, but more people in the street in SUPPORT of the theocracy.
I'm still learning about how the Assembly of Experts are elected, but it sounds like when Khamenei passes, the people's voice can be heard for the next Ayatollah (is that the right term?), and it SOUNDS like this is the point in time where Iranian people get their periodic say on the direction the government will take, based on the choices of the "Experts."
For a country their size, it's an interesting model of government. I definitely prefer my Madison and Jefferson, don't get me wrong. But one of the things to which "liberal democracy" is prone is a moral decay and general unhappiness. RELIGION gives a lot of people a sense of belonging to something bigger, more lasting. And they can live happier, more productive lives. Well, some of 'em, anyway.
I think it's AN answer to the ceiling that Western society keeps bumping its head against. Once we've secured the dream, for the most part, we abandon it. We breed up the uneducated and the educated stop breeding! We are guaranteed an education, and then we make damn sure it's the worst fuckin' education possible.
My knowledge of the classics was ABYSMAL from the public schools. I never HEARD of the contest of ideas between Euripedes and Aristotle, although I was educated enough to understand the significance and meaning, when I just picked it up on my own MANY years later (Yay Internet! Yay Tom Richey!). Heh. I was deeply influenced by Ayn Rand's "Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal," which I stole off my Dad in my college days. Recommended for everyone. John Galt was too boring. But the straight, to-the-point stuff was more up my line, in a brief paperback!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@josm1481 No, the press was not impartial a decade or even 6 decades ago. They just hid it, better, and there was no competition for the legacy networks and legacy print media. Things only SEEMED better when it was just the NYT, WaPo, and NBC, ABC and CBS. I've been following it since the 1970s and the only difference, now, is that there are good-sized platforms that disagree with "The Message" and millions of people who realize they're being lied to, finally.
You upset about WMDs in Iraq? They pulled the same sort of stunt in Vietnam, 60-plus years ago. And if you opposed more big spending by government, EVERY network attacked you for being uncharitable and selfish, even though you contributed more to private charity than any 10 Democrats..
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Common sense, scholarship, and ethics. HE MUST BE SILENCED!
-The Establishment
I think the bypass was justified on a right-to-try basis, with full disclosure, in a big enough crisis. That's not what happened, nor was it truly the crisis they told us it was. The mandates and the mass distribution of the experimental treatment to people - especially young people - at low or no risk of serious illness or harm from COVID, itself, was an abomination. An atrocity on Nuremberg levels. The suppression of successful treatments with off-the-shelf, re-purposed drugs like HCQ and Ivermectin, was criminal. Doctors in clinics, treating hundreds and even thousands of patients, were under no circumstances to share their success stories with colleagues and the public.
If all they'd done was NOTHING and SHARE every scrap of treatment and outcome information, peer-to-peer, we'd've had the treatment side of it licked in a couple weeks. Many doctors DID. Few spoke of it, so the sharing part never took place, and authorities were hostile to such sharing.
We all know this was an atrocity committed against the peoples of the world. I don't care if it was for profit or not. Those profits are FORFEIT. They were obtained by fraud, from inside and outside of government.
1
-
1
-
1