Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1.  @bernoinferno4389  : I'm gonna start calling you Mary-Lou Retton for your tortured gymnastics.
    1
  2. Set records for killing. And 99% of those who died because of evil religionists were themselves religious people. It's like saying "penis" or "vagina" is the great evil, because every murderer in history had one or the other.
    1
  3.  @sherpacool9931  : Millions have been saved, too. Many have received mercy and compassion because some idiot believed in a God of mercy and love. The corrupt Church hierarchy kept knowledge alive through the Dark Ages. It's not black and white. The religion that killed the most people in the 20th Century was Marxism.
    1
  4.  @yvesgomes  : Not the opposite. Just kind of weak criticism.
    1
  5.  @Geneeeeeeeeeee  : Explain "Pascal's Wager" to an atheist.
    1
  6.  @GisHur  : Atheists can pick apart any doctrine or dogma. Men's understanding of the Divine/sublime is imperfect, but that doesn't mean there isn't something greater. Doesn't mean there IS, either. That's why God-deniers are every bit as religious as anybody else. The evidence of our senses, i.e., science, is actually silent on the subject. Existence of God is utterly unfalsifiable, in general, although you can probably poke holes in any individual's specific idea of what God is.
    1
  7. IOW, he gave an argument and you gave a talking point.
    1
  8.  @ak2wa2or  So you're saying that fundamentalist religions are mutually exclusive. That's what mytmouse57 was saying. You're so smart you're dumb.
    1
  9. He's a laughingstock everywhere but on the CBC and fellow-traveler legacy media. But the whole world and most of Canada knows he's a joke, except those who are in the CBC bubble.
    1
  10.  @cranekraken24  : Constitution is essentially a liberal document. "Liberal" has taken on pretty much the opposite of its original meaning. It used to mean individual rights. Now it means the collective is greater than the individual, the state is supreme.
    1
  11.  @servicedog2325  Start by trusting NO ONE until they EARN your trust.
    1
  12.  @fcuk_x  : I take The Duran with a grain of salt, considering they work for RT, but that doesn't stop me from listening to them, and damned if I've found anything they've said that they needed to retract, later.
    1
  13.  @Cunnysmythe  : I admire Weinstein for finally making a stand. I despise him for not seeing his hand in promoting leftist ideals that gave rise to the situation he had to take a stand against. He rails against the kind of NPC nonsense that his nanny-government ideology creates.
    1
  14. He's not the only one. And more are fighting for views, every day.
    1
  15. He's talking about targeting and recruiting spies. That's a lot different from training and arming Islamic terrorists, because we're upset with the Soviets.
    1
  16. He's talking about recruiting and running spies. It's what the CIA is supposed to do. As opposed to making shit up just to cover its ass.
    1
  17. Everything that was un-redacted, after court fights and so on, was revealed to be EMBARRASSING to the people who were claiming "national security" and talking shit about "methods and sources." None of the redacted materials contained anything damaging to anybody but the people hiding behind national security.
    1
  18. As an NFL fan, I just want to say that this guy looks like and sounds like Nick Wright, without the giant proboscis.
    1
  19. Trump doesn't have to demolish anybody. But he doesn't have to trade with assholes, either.
    1
  20.  @scania1982  : Nah. Then he would have to answer the question "Well, if you're so smart, then why do your leftist-inspired government programs always fail?" I think he's good for free speech, but not much else.
    1
  21. The Chinese need the oil. The last thing they want is a disruption in supply.
    1
  22. Fracking is viable, and that's why prices will never go up as high here in the states as the Saudis and Venezuelans might wish.
    1
  23. or he's got a tummy ache or...
    1
  24.  @steveryan1799  : This guy didn't make millions while working for the CIA. And he didn't stay in for 30 years, like a real swamp creature. And he's calling out the bullshit, rather than whitewashing it, like all the guys I see on CNN, who are ex-CIA (supposedly).
    1
  25. Somehow I feel like this guy is more reliable than ex-CIA "news" casters on CNN and MSNBC.
    1
  26. Old news.
    1
  27.  @XRLostCause  I WANT A CHICKE DINNER! I WANT A CHICKEN DINNER! GO BENGALS!
    1
  28. Yes. But not really profound or prophetic. Wars and rumors of wars have been around since before Abraham.
    1
  29. Yes.
    1
  30. They're not ALL like Brennan. Some of them actually give a shit about our country.
    1
  31. What's he saying that's so triggering for you?
    1
  32.  @josm1481  No, the press was not impartial a decade or even 6 decades ago. They just hid it, better, and there was no competition for the legacy networks and legacy print media. Things only SEEMED better when it was just the NYT, WaPo, and NBC, ABC and CBS. I've been following it since the 1970s and the only difference, now, is that there are good-sized platforms that disagree with "The Message" and millions of people who realize they're being lied to, finally. You upset about WMDs in Iraq? They pulled the same sort of stunt in Vietnam, 60-plus years ago. And if you opposed more big spending by government, EVERY network attacked you for being uncharitable and selfish, even though you contributed more to private charity than any 10 Democrats..
    1
  33. '90s liberals paved the way for crazy, but they're too stupid to connect the dots.
    1
  34. True liberals are against all the big-government bullshit that so-called "liberals" all support. Bill Maher was never a true liberal.
    1
  35. If MSM showed BLM riots every night in 2020, their sheeple would've been desensitized to protests gone bad and Jan 6th would've been just another "mostly peaceful" protest. But they were Trump supporters, so "Insurrection!" after 4 straight years of insurrection from within and without the federal government.
    1
  36. Don't submit to the culture vandals! It's "DIE" (death), not "DEI" (God).
    1
  37. They tolerate zero diversity and judge people based on immutable physical characteristics, when they're not busy discriminating against religion.
    1
  38.  @mustang607  MARXIST RE-EDUCATION IS IN!
    1
  39. They use our virtue against us. Such is the nature of naked pursuit of power. And no I'm not talking about a guy looking for an electrical outlet sans clothing.
    1
  40. Centralized, top-down command economies are created on the assumption that the elites know what's good for us and WANT what's good for us. But in practice, the task of managing everything from on high leads to destruction and the elimination of civil rights for the individual. It's for our own good, so we should accept hundreds of millions dead by firing squad and starvation.
    1
  41. Religions that persist have a clear survival imperative built in. Often by design, because the originators of religion are all about unifying people under one political banner, with God - and faith - as the unifying principle. They persist because they agree - whether thru science or "Divine Revelation" - with what science eventually ends up telling us. We can talk about civil unions 'til the cows come home, but the fact is that not a single human being who ever lived was the product of a homosexual union. LGBTQXYZ are all products of heterosexual unions. I'm not a huge fan of state-recognized marriages, hetero or otherwise, because the advantages they build into having children mainly serve the state's endless thirst for tax revenue and cannon fodder. It's an artificial "grow!" imperative from an earlier time. But since it IS enshrined in the law, and MEDICAL and PENSION BENEFITS are attached to recognized unions, then ANY union - hetero or otherwise - should be recognized by the state, as well. It should be that people get married because they want to solemnize a long-term relationship. And if you share the same home, same bed, same LIFE for years, your spouse should receive the standard spousal benefits.
    1
  42. Speaking of over-fishing, Ronald Reagan, a sacred cow of conservatives, wasn't above intervening in the economy to the detriment of the environment. They over-fished the New England fisheries after Reagan made it easier for fishermen to get low-interest loans to "own their own boat." This was ruinous to the ecosystem off the Atlantic coast. The best intervention is NO intervention. Give people maximum flexibility and they will find better solutions than well-meaning (debatable) bureaucrats and politicians could ever dream of. But you've got to get out of their way. That way, the ONLY systems that will rise are systems that are provably sustainable.
    1
  43. So let's have our OWN speech police, run by the most toxic Christians? Because that kind of power is a magnet for psychopaths. The hierarchy of every large institution that's been in existence for very long, is eventually populated by the exact people who should NEVER have power.
    1
  44. Aliens looking down on Earth: "We observed the rise of a new religion, worshiping some kind of sex god, led by priests in clown outfits. We'll continue to monitor. It appears to be some sort of death cult that despises children. We anticipate an extinction event."
    1
  45. They don't trust it. They know we say one thing and do another.
    1
  46.  @njiomonansichristianfreder6374  You realize that the Holy Bible was written by organized religion, don't you?
    1
  47. That's because Muslims DGAF. Mess with THEIR god, and they're coming for your blood. None of these liberals want that.
    1
  48. MSM has been self-parody for years.
    1
  49. She just shrugs off people's suffering. And I bet on any given day, she'll claim to be super-empathetic and lecture YOU about your lack of emotional intelligence. I haven't seen the war on the middle class so brutally executed since stagflation of the '70s and the enormous growth in entitlements that accompanied it. Now, half of the country are directly dependent on the government for their basic needs, work for the government distributing entitlements, or regulating everything under the sun, or working for an institution that does government's slightest bidding. We're damn near as fascist as Hitler's Germany, making all the same economically disastrous central-planning blunders, without even admitting our government is trying to centrally plan EVERYthing. It's disheartening. We've known how this plays out since Otto Von Bismarck socialized medicine in Germany in the 19th Century (December 1884). If people knew their history, they would be trying to wean us off Medicare and Medicaid. Nice idea. Not the way to help people. Government only knows one way to administer anything, which anyone who THINKS will agree is POORLY.
    1
  50. Nothing new, here, unless you're a smooth brain, but then you would never see any of Dave Rubin's content.
    1