Comments by "Harry Mills" (@harrymills2770) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. It's not worse than it's ever been. We just know more about ourselves and each other. Why do you think liberals have been hyper-ventilating for 3 1/2 years? They're finding out that their comfortable little reality isn't the larger reality. It's just like 50 years ago, when a Christian nation realized that half the country hadn't accepted Jesus as their Lord and Savior. Still a LOT of Christians who're convinced that half the country is under the Spell Of Satan. Well, now that other half of the country has discovered to its shock and horror that half the country actually voted for Donald Trump! DEPLORABLE! Such periods are traumatic for some people. For other people, these times of paradigm shift are very consciousness-raising. I know my father was dragged into the 21st Century, kicking and screaming, railing against Walter Cronkite and rooting for Archie Bunker back in the '60s and '70s, and finally coming around to agreeing with me that the War on Drugs is just Al Capone with a deep tan. Legalize, regulate and tax the stuff. Dad was offended by The Jeffersons and Good Times; whereas, we kids were ALL about KID DIE-NO-MITE! Acceptance of gays was HUGE for my parents' generation. I grew up during that paradigm shift, starting on the regressive side, and finally figuring out that there's only one person whose sexual preferences you should care about other than your own, and that's your partner's. The only exception is if you're attracted to citizens below the age of consent, and then it's a matter for your psychiatrist and, if you act on your preference, law enforcement and the courts. Now the people who are freaking out are the Boomers who used to watch "Friends," and still do on re-runs, FAIK. The hip, well-adjusted middle-class yuppies are all very chic, very up-to-date on the latest dogma, and they're no different from my Methodist preacher extracting the meaning of life from the verse "He fed the dog."
    1
  17. 1
  18. Mix of truth and lies. There ARE oil magnates with politicians on speed dial. You might be surprised how deeply embedded in the Green New Deal they are, managing its wording so that they can take maximum advantage of government subsidies and keep millions of small projects from ever getting STARTED, by controlling the regulations that will come with it. "We're going to have to take down your windmill, ma'am, because it doesn't have wheelchair-accessible entrance" or some shit like that. That's the main reason I oppose Green New Deal, because I think the CULTURE is going green faster than a handful of eggheads in industry and government can even keep up with, and the last people we want in charge of how the changes are made are idiots like AOC, following the advice of the "experts" who are most accessible (and generous) to them. Arguably the biggest obstacle to EarthShip construction principles is government regulators. The guys preaching to us about environment are the same guys who won't let you build more green-conscious in an organic way. No. To THEM it means a more efficient gas furnace hooked to their grid. A cracker-box wood-frame construction on top of the ground that's so tight you breathe your own effluvia. Can't have a house that breathes. You need to buy disposable air filters from an outfit in China... Green tech and living in balance with nature is a ground-up phenomenon, and the people on the ground can share their successes and failures, INSTANTLY, with other people just like themselves, across broad spans of climate, altitude, culture, and resource settings, informally, over the Internet. We need more Kirsten Dirksen's, not more government programs that are just big money-makers for the people writing the fine print and first in line for the benefits. The internal combustion engine is a fantastic asset to humanity. But driving 40 miles to work every day in a car is just a stupid way to live. People are figuring that out, but you don't need to punish them or use force on them. Living greener is already seen as a "good" in this culture, so let it play out! And when I hear "shovel-ready" out of a politician's mouth, I about blow a gasket laughing and crying at the same time. They're the last people we want deciding how to clean things up.
    1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. There are different kinds of intelligence. Not all kinds revolve around oratory. Most of the most gifted people I've known in any area lacked the ability to articulate things in a way that is most pleasing to others. Most of the best people, I really have to sit down with, ALONE, and give them time and space to "get it out," often with much necessary prodding. And THEN there are the people - I think Trump is one - who deliver things in a way that is absolutely unappealing to many intellectuals, and certainly anyone who doesn't like his ideas - who can nevertheless reach people I never could, even with my absolute BEST attempts at combining truth, humor and precise word choice. The larger the crowd I'm trying to reach, especially on technical matters, the more pleasing I am to the top-level learners/intellects, but the less real meaning I seem to get across to the vast middle. Even people who LOVE the way I put it across, because I worked in something funny, miss the essence of what I'm saying. I've walked out of some of my absolute best math lectures, where I had entire auditoriums filled with students hanging on my every word and rolling in the aisles at every little joke, and glanced at the notes of random students, silently noting that what they put down was NOT the point I was making! I saw every hook I inserted, with the wrong - sometimes the OPPOSITE - idea dangling from it. One of the amazing things about a perception-driven reality is how often people are right for the wrong reasons and how often they're wrong for the RIGHT reasons. In my college days in the 1980s, as a staunch libertarian-principle kind of guy, I found many of the people who were on "my" side of an issue, were there for the wrong reason. They would agree with me that the welfare state was destructive, but it came from a "DESTROY THE PARASITES!" place, rather than a "This is the velvet glove on the iron fist" place. The people stuck in the poverty cycle weren't evil, but the ones who kept them on "the plantation" with Free Stuff were demagogues. Since the Reagan era, this has expanded to much of the white middle class, who are so afraid they won't be able to afford health care that government intervention has made more and more ridiculously expensive for individual consumers and taxpayers, that they yearn to be on the federal tit just as much as the poorest person who can't even afford a checkup. Jesus spoke in simple parables. Ayn Rand, whose fiction leaves me yawning, reached more people with Atlas Shrugged than she ever reached with MY favorite, "Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal," a skinny paperback that is extremely dense and extensively footnoted. Character development isn't her thing. Donald Trump actually got himself elected president of the USA with little more than choppy sequences of repeated sound bites.
    1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. A populist feature I hadn't noticed:s The content creators who rise up out of the oyster grass to become major YouTube presences have more than their share of patrons, but ALSO more than their share of the $1, $2 or $5 contributions from us "small folk." To stamp out the voice of the "small folk," it's easy to see who's getting all the 2s and fews, and I imagine those small donations are more cost and less profit from the payment processors. They don't like us small folk. We say mean things about bankers and our petty transactions cost more to process for what they pay. And there are so damn many of us. Anyway, just by tracking the pain-in-the-ass channels that have many SMALL contributions, they can zero in on most of the subversive voices after they start getting traction. The trouble from the banker's side is that as soon as they use this tactic, there are 2 more to take the last guy's place. They're in their own self-made version of Zombie Apocalypse, with all us small folk representing the zombies! It's like we are H.Y.D.R.A. Chop off one head, and 2 more appear. But they're doing everything they can to plug all the holes in their dam against free expression. And their contrrol of "process" is very tight, and we haven't heard the last of them, nor shall we. The best we can do is marginalize/minimize their effect. I think the FreeThinkers are only just beginning to realize how deeply embedded this perniciousness is and what it will take to keep the power in the people's hands. As we peel away the layers of the Patreon onion, we see that there will also be every obstruction possible set in the way of free speech, now by banking laws, regulations and so-called "best practices." Best practices are more about the culture of banking and culture tends to trump the formal rule sets (or quickly be codified in rule sets).
    1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1