Comments by "Daily Wire Third Stringer" (@DailyWireThirdStringer) on "Who is Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson? l ABC News" video.
-
2
-
We don't ask judges to define an electron or an axial compressor rotor, or literally anything else that may be the subject of litigation. We leave that up to scientists, engineers, and mechanics, which is why we ask them to testify in such cases to provide their expert advice. The same thing is true of "woman." It's a biologist's job to define what a woman is, not someone who practices law. She was right to give the response she did. What you're missing here is that if there was a case brought to the Supreme Court that involved defining a "woman" (Title III, Title VII, Title IX, or whatever), then more than likely an expert's opinion will be sought. You seem to think that judges should be jacks-of-all-trades, when in fact that has never been the case throughout all of American legal history.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
We don't ask judges to define an electron or an axial compressor rotor, or literally anything else that may be the subject of litigation. We leave that up to scientists, engineers, and mechanics, which is why we ask them to testify in such cases to provide their expert advice. The same thing is true of "woman." It's a biologist's job to define what a woman is, not someone who practices law. She was right to give the response she did. What you're missing here is that if there was a case brought to the Supreme Court that involved defining a "woman" (Title III, Title VII, Title IX, or whatever), then more than likely an expert's opinion will be sought. You seem to think that judges should be jacks-of-all-trades, when in fact that has never been the case throughout all of American legal history.
1
-
1
-
Ah, so the Bible is your favorite collection of ancient myths and fairy tales, huh? Nice. Personally I have an affinity for Homer's the Iliad and the Odyssey, but the Vedas, the Pyramid texts, the Coffin texts, the Egyptian Book of the Dead, the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Instruction of Amenemope, the Book of Caverns, the Book of Gates, the Amdaut, the Book of the Heavenly Cow, the Code of Hammurabi, the Kesh Temple Hymn, the Popol Vuh, the Avesta, the Koran, and the writings of Herodotus are all good too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We don't ask judges to define an electron or an axial compressor rotor, or literally anything else that may be the subject of litigation. We leave that up to scientists, engineers, and mechanics, which is why we ask them to testify in such cases to provide their expert advice. The same thing is true of "woman." It's a biologist's job to define what a woman is, not someone who practices law. She was right to give the response she did. What you're missing here is that if there was a case brought to the Supreme Court that involved defining a "woman" (Title III, Title VII, Title IX, or whatever), then more than likely an expert's opinion will be sought. You seem to think that judges should be jacks-of-all-trades, when in fact that has never been the case throughout all of American legal history.
1
-
We don't ask judges to define an electron or an axial compressor rotor, or literally anything else that may be the subject of litigation. We leave that up to scientists, engineers, and mechanics, which is why we ask them to testify in such cases to provide their expert advice. The same thing is true of "woman." It's a biologist's job to define what a woman is, not someone who practices law. She was right to give the response she did. What you're missing here is that if there was a case brought to the Supreme Court that involved defining a "woman" (Title III, Title VII, Title IX, or whatever), then more than likely an expert's opinion will be sought. You seem to think that judges should be jacks-of-all-trades, when in fact that has never been the case throughout all of American legal history.
Also, life begins at conception, but that's completely irrelevant as to whether abortion is moral. From a utilitarian perspective, if it doesn't cause the fetus pain (and before 18 weeks gestation it doesn't), then there is very little wrong with it, ethically speaking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Biden can nominate whoever he wants. Anyone crying foul that he's selecting on the basis of immutable characteristics better not lean Republican. Ronald Reagan specifically selected the first female nominee to the Supreme Court (Sandra Day O'Connor), his successor George H.W. Bush replaced the first African-American Justice (Thurgood Marshall) with Clarence Thomas, and just over a year ago President Trump made a shortlist of female judges to fill Ruth Bader Ginsberg's seat, ultimately deciding on Amy Coney Barrett. Well, two can play at that game...
We don't ask judges to define an electron or an axial compressor rotor, or literally anything else that may be the subject of litigation. We leave that up to scientists, engineers, and mechanics, which is why we ask them to testify in such cases to provide their expert advice. The same thing is true of "woman." It's a biologist's job to define what a woman is, not someone who practices law. She was right to give the response she did. What you're missing here is that if there was a case brought to the Supreme Court that involved defining a "woman" (Title III, Title VII, Title IX, or whatever), then more than likely an expert's opinion will be sought. You seem to think that judges should be jacks-of-all-trades, when in fact that has never been the case throughout all of American legal history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We don't ask judges to define an electron or an axial compressor rotor, or literally anything else that may be the subject of litigation. We leave that up to scientists, engineers, and mechanics, which is why we ask them to testify in such cases to provide their expert advice. The same thing is true of "woman." It's a biologist's job to define what a woman is, not someone who practices law. She was right to give the response she did. What you're missing here is that if there was a case brought to the Supreme Court that involved defining a "woman" (Title III, Title VII, Title IX, or whatever), then more than likely an expert's opinion will be sought. You seem to think that judges should be jacks-of-all-trades, when in fact that has never been the case throughout all of American legal history.
1
-
1