Comments by "Frank DeMaris" (@kemarisite) on "Kantai Kessen (Japanese Decisive Battle Doctrine) - Method or Madness?" video.
-
6
-
4
-
4
-
2
-
@joshthomas-moore2656 BK_Jeong has something of a point about the AA presence of a light cruiser. The Cleveland and Baltimore class cruisers carry comparable crews and almost identical AA suites, but the US Navy found in 1942-43 that their 6"/47 armed light cruisers, with a rate of fire of 8-10 round per minute per gun, were far more useful at swatting destroyers in night actions than heavy cruisers with the 3-4 rpm 8"/55. Other navies had 6" (ish) guns firing at 5-6 rpm, maybe up to 8 rpm for the British 6"/50 Mark XXIII, so most light cruiser guns if WW2 do not make up in rate of fire what they lack in individual shell power compared to their heavy counterparts. On the other hand, if your navy also builds smaller ships as light cruisers because they have smaller guns, say the Italian Condotierri classes or the British Leanders and Arethusas, then the CL may also carry lighter AA suites and not be the better deal. On the gripping hand, an Atlanta or Dido can be a fine CL for AA work and the 5" or 5.25" guns still work just fine for swatting destroyers and making life unpleasant for cruisers, while the ship itself is lighter (about 6,000 tons) than a full size cruiser and needs a smaller crew (5-600)
2
-
1