Comments by "Mortablunt" (@Mortablunt) on "Task & Purpose" channel.

  1. 294
  2. 165
  3. 27
  4. 23
  5. 21
  6. 19
  7. 17
  8. 17
  9. 14
  10. 14
  11. 13
  12. 13
  13. 12
  14. 9
  15. 9
  16. 9
  17. 9
  18. 8
  19. 8
  20. 8
  21. 7
  22. 7
  23. 7
  24. 7
  25. 7
  26. 6
  27. 6
  28. 6
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. @Mike Hunt @Mandrake92 Way to not understand the situation at all! The underlined reality was the American occupation government was ineffective, corrupt, and gave nobody anything to fight for. You should actually read the investigations into it as well as interviews with former Afghan soldiers. A very common theme is abuse of the military, oftentimes soldiers didn’t get paid at all for a weeks or even months. The American backed regime also liked to play tribal and cultural favorites; although passions are just 40% of the Afghan population the represented almost all of the posts of any imports in the government, and they not only disenfranchised the other 60% of the people, they also abused them. Ministers used influence to enrich themselves and pull favors for their particular tribe while abusing the government to punish and oppress rivals. People we were counting on as civil servants to run the countries operated more like gang leaders. The government failed to deliver on any kind of public good. Roads didn’t get worked, on water, didn’t get supplied electricity didn’t come, criminals didn’t get prosecuted, Schools didn’t get run, and so on. The two parts in particular about schools and law were most important. The Afghan official courts were extremely corrupt and also had all kinds of loopholes actually enforced by American occupation forces. The Taliban for all their faults actually provided a sort of education, some types of social services, and even brought some law and order to an otherwise a completely anarchic countryside. Between the abuse, the disenfranchisement, and not getting paid for their work, there was a reason the Afghan occupation regime folded.
    5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. According to official statistics only 1 in 6 Ukrainians speaks English to any kind of functional degree. I haven’t bothered to check exactly what this means but I am going to bed I mean something like A2 or B1 level of understanding. It’s enough to have a casual conversation but it’s not enough to hold a job that depends on language skills and it would be insufficient for understanding English language training materials, and they would be completely unable to understand more advanced technical guides for subjects such as vehicle repair or anything that depends on jargon. English is not as easy as you think. The biggest pro is the simple script and how it’s sparing use of inflections make it basically plug and play. This is compensated for with most infamously how English tense and aspect work. Up Next is Engglish relies heavily on certain words which have enormous numbers of meetings that are highly contextual. Words like set and get which are some of the most frequent have dozens of meanings each. The most heavily recycled word I can think of in Ukrainian or Russian is za, which has at most six meanings depending on how old is used in contacts, but you get help with what case it gets matched to and if it’s a prefix. The last great obstacle is phrasality. Imagine three words that all run together to form the meaning of a single word the actual meaning and usage of which is only minimally connected to the individual meanings of its base components. For example, knock it off means stop. English is significantly more ambiguous with Russians when it comes to verbs and adjectives. If an English word can I have multiple contextual meetings odds are in Russian they use separate words for each of these. English also does not mark for several categories like Russian does which means the words Carry less information, including personal and grammatical components. Example, run can mean several things. The nouns would get several different words in Russian depending on what they are. But if used as a verb Russian inflections enable giving a very precise meaning and implicit messages. For example one grammatical rendition of run can mean run for your life we’re about to get hit by artillery, while another one could metaphorically mean making a short trip to get food, and another could mean quickly take a look and report back. So English isn’t quite that simple or easy.
    3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. Well, he completely misses the political aspect of the situation. This whole writeup is incredibly self-serving and spins like the rings of Saturn, so I’ll be succinct. War is classically politics, by other means. Due to the strong varied resentments against the president of Syria at the start of the last decade, there was a strong coalition opposed to his rule. This included democracy advocates, who wanted more liberal government. This included Theo Kratts, who wanted a more religious government. This included social conservatives, who did not like him following European style modernization, and it also included Arabists, who dislike the fact that he of the ruling class were made of a non Muslim minority called the Alawi. Most of these groups have a little in common with each other, other than not liking the president. At first, when hostilities began, they need to work together to prevent assured destruction by the central authority, and its military overcame many other concerns, but overtime as it seemed like the government forces were surely going to lose they had to start thinking about the realities of who is going to rule Syria next, and what the new Syria was going to look like, and how it would function. Just came at the same time as an opening power vacuum as much of the state was no longer under the control of the government. So the groups started fighting each other, and the various ideologies started pushing for dominance. One of the very few things that united a plurality of groups was that they share the same religion, Sunni Islam. So the political Islam factions had a leg up on securing control, and the ones that became ISIS were ruthless in killing or subordinating absolutely all other Islamist factions. Emergence of Isis politically was a response to a socialunrest, autocratic rule that opposed many values held by the Syrian people, and what they felt to be their culture. With the importance of religion in Syrian society, being led by a warrior clerk, massively helped Isis with receiving social and political legitimization from factions outside of government control. The sinful evil secular authority was gone, and in came a supposedly righteous religious authority that would rule with enlightenment. Supposedly.
    3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3