Comments by "Top Quark" (@topquark6919) on "Russia's Shoigu Shown Iranian Drones, Missiles After Shahed Attack On Ukraine's Oil Refinery | Watch" video.

  1.  @PerceivedREALITY999  The proxy war in Ukraine is the first time nato has tried to pick on someone their own size and nato is getting humiliated. Did Russia pick on someone their own size, when they invaded Ukraine? (Clue) Russia is 28 times larger than Ukraine! 😂 Putin is the one who is being humiliated, by his OWN incompetence! 😂😂 Definition of 'Humiliation' = claiming your invasion will be 'over within day's'. (When it's day 570+) 😂😂
    4
  2.  @PerceivedREALITY999  'nato has lost a lot of military equipment. Many types of drones, HIMARS, many types of air defense systems (patriot, NASAM, IRIS-T, etc.), cruise missiles, M777, M119, Leopard 2A6, Challenger 2, HARMs, AN/TPQ-36, AN/TPQ-50, javelins, CV90, Bradley, AMX-10 RC, stryker, PzH 2000, CAESAR and the list goes on. (over-hyped junk)' Why would you embarrass yourself, making the above comment?! 🤔😂 You have NO idea, what weaponry has been destroyed. You have NOT, carried out an detailed inventory, of battlefield losses, to be able to make that assumption. You have NOT done an inventory, of the NATO supply depo's, either. Why make a fool of yourself? 🤔😂
    2
  3. Did you conveniently 'forget', that Russia HAD to request supplies of ammunition from: China, Iran & North Korea? 🤔😂😂
    1
  4. Russia needs a new leader! 😂
    1
  5. Yup, it's just not beneficial to the rest of the world! Is all this 'friendship' will do, is destabilise the world, even more.
    1
  6.  @monumentaltravel3745  You clearly haven't read the comments correctly! @perceivedreality7933 frequently comments this: 'nato has lost a lot of military equipment. Many types of drones, HIMARS, many types of air defense systems (patriot, NASAM, IRIS-T, etc.), cruise missiles, M777, M119, Leopard 2A6, Challenger 2, HARMs, AN/TPQ-36, AN/TPQ-50, javelins, CV90, Bradley, AMX-10 RC, stryker, PzH 2000, CAESAR and the list goes on. (over-hyped junk)' I responded to him, with: 'You have NO idea, what weaponry has been destroyed. You have NOT, carried out an detailed inventory, of battlefield losses, to be able to make that assumption.' You have NOT done an inventory, of the NATO supply depo's, either. Why make a fool of yourself? 🤔😂 Meaning, he's making an assumption that NATO has lost lots of equipment, whilst NOT acknowledging Russia has done the same! @perceivedreality7933 is Pro-Putin/Pro-Russia and anti-west/NATO/Ukraine. I'm Pro-Ukraine/NATO.
    1
  7.  @monumentaltravel3745 'yeah I've seen it 100 times.' If you have seen it, 100 times, how can you ask such an inane question?! 🤔😂 'but Russia have lost more than ten times as much as NATO, so what's your point. It's a war, folks lose equipment.'
    1
  8.  @monumentaltravel3745  I agree! I have made my point, in a clear manner! For some reason, you are failing to understand it. My point was, which I 'wrote' in my comment, @perceivedreality7933 was quoting all the 'equipment' that NATO had lost, but did not wish to mention, the vast amount of 'equipment' that Russia had also lost! He claimed NATO equipment was 'overrated' junk. Here is his comment! 'nato has lost a lot of military equipment. Many types of drones, HIMARS, many types of air defense systems (patriot, NASAM, IRIS-T, etc.), cruise missiles, M777, M119, Leopard 2A6, Challenger 2, HARMs, AN/TPQ-36, AN/TPQ-50, javelins, CV90, Bradley, AMX-10 RC, stryker, PzH 2000, CAESAR and the list goes on. (over-hyped junk)'
    1
  9.  @monumentaltravel3745  FFS! What is wrong with you?! Read my post! If you can't manage that, due to it's 'complexity' get an adult to help decipher it for you! 😂
    1
  10.  @monumentaltravel3745  Yes. Shame you couldn't have read & understood his post, earlier.
    1
  11.  @monumentaltravel3745  You shouldn't be picking 'fights', with fellow supporters. Keep your 'enthusiasm for battle' for the Putin/Russia supporters!
    1