Comments by "Top Quark" (@topquark6919) on "Russia To Strike Ukraine With Nuclear Missiles? Putin Declares 'Sarmat To Join Combat Soon'" video.

@johnmartin6854 YES! Then OUTGOING from NATO to Russia! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
2
NATO has a nuclear triad, too. It's NOT exclusive to Russia! 😂🤣😂🤣 Do you know what a nuclear triad, is? The nuclear triad is a three-pronged military force structure that consists of land-launched nuclear missiles, nuclear-missile-armed submarines, and strategic aircraft with nuclear bombs and missiles.
1
@calzabbath 'ICBMs are not hypersonic except precisely for the Russian Sarmats and Avangardes' That's incorrect. ICBM's travel at around 15,000 mph. Hypersonic speed is classed as 3,500 mph.
1
@calzabbath 'What you're referring to is correct, but mostly an American concept.' That 'reads' like you are inferring the American's are being dishonest? What, exactly, do you mean by an 'American concept'?? 'Thing is NASA classifies this as high hypersonic but, being PR and information wars as important as the military (and many times lying about the real realms of operation for any given system) their top speed is Mach 25, something no American missile has reached yet.' Who is lying? Are you stating, when you say, 'and many times lying about the real realms of operation for any given system', that the US is blatantly lying, again?? If you claim that the US is telling lies, regarding their technology/weaponry, you must have proof? You must also concede that Russia lies, too? You'll lose any credibility you thought you had, if you claim the US lies about the effectiveness of it's weapons systems and/or it's technology, but Russia is genuine & trustworthy and tells nothing but the truth! That would just make you appear to be extremely foolish & gullible! 😂 You clearly like to expound the advantages of Russian weapons technology, however, let's be brutally honest, here. If Russia were to start WW3, only a complete idiot, would think there could be an outright 'Winner'. The concept of someone winning WW3, is farcical. Between Russia & America, they have enough nuclear warheads to destroy the planet, many, many times over. You can only destroy any given continent, once! I know about Russia's 'Dead Hand', I've read the book by David. E. Hoffman. I would not be surprised, in the slightest, if America has such a defensive system in operation, too. I'm sure you'll try and convince me, that Russia, with it's 'enviable technological advances', is alone in operating such an advanced defensive system?! 🤔😂🤣😂🤣
1
The doctrine of MAD? (Mutually Assured Destruction) means It doesn't matter, one iota, about Russia's Sarmat missiles. Let me explain why. The Sarmat ballistic missile is meant to be a deterrent. A deterrent, is a nuclear weapon or weapons system regarded as deterring an enemy from attacking. It is supposed to install FEAR and INTIMIDATION in a possible enemy. If Russia attacked the 'west', they would retaliate with their vast reserve of nuclear weapons, and quite probably, all life on earth would end. Russia, and the 'west' know this. Putin, likes to demonstrate his bravado, that's why he frequently threatens the use of his nuclear weapons.
1
This BS Russian propaganda rhetoric, is utter nonsense. If anyone believes they (Russia or America) can START and WIN a nuclear war, they are delusional/stupid, or quite possibly BOTH. NATO/USA satellites and land based early warning detection, would pick up the launch of Russian missiles. This would result in a massive nuclear retaliatory strike, from NATO. Remember all NATO's submarine launched SLBM's, too. I wish those fools who claim Russia could start, and win, an nuclear war, would use a little common sense BEFORE making such ridiculous comments. Only HALF of Russia's and America's nuclear warheads, would need to hit target, to wipe out most of the life on Earth.
1
'Peaceful coexistence can happen once there is mutual respect among nations' Shame Putin didn't take this into consideration, BEFORE invading a Independent, sovereign & democratic country.
1