Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "Occult Literature 223: A Treatise on Magic" video.

  1. I found it online easily enough. It looks like crap: the usual fluff, undoubtedly with the typical "blinds" introduced for the poor reader's benefit, since too much knowledge was thought to be a dangerous thing. So they were in the habit of misleading the reader (ostensibly, for his own good). They probably didn't know what they were talking about, so they bluffed. And few knew well enough to call them on it. You'd have to contrast and compare widely the various occult works just to have a chance of piecing it all together. It's a worthy pursuit. But the idea that ALL of this literature has value is pretty ridiculous, don't you think?
    2