Comments by "The Immortal" (@theimmortal4718) on "China's NEW Giant Infantry Vehicle is a Nightmare" video.

  1. These aren't for fighting in China. Why would their terrain matter at all?
    11
  2. It's size wouldn't hinder ship transport at all. We transport MBTs with no issues
    2
  3.  @SoloRenegade  Again, why do you think this was designed for any of those places?
    2
  4.  @saadkhan1128  Correct
    2
  5. Javelin has entered the chat
    1
  6.  @SoloRenegade  Javelins work in the mountains
    1
  7.  @SoloRenegade  Why would you think this was designed to be used domestically? The Bradley and Abrams have never been used in combat in the US. American terrain would have no influence on their design. These are weapons for export and use outside of china's borders, not within their own country. There is nobody threatening to invade them that would require these, hence their mountains don't matter.
    1
  8.  @SoloRenegade  You do realize that China is trying to sell these, right? Globally. You can't think of any place on the planet that might be appropriate for a 50 ton tracked armored vehicle? Really? These aren't designed for fighting in jungles. Neither is the Bradley. These aren't designed for the Himalayas. Neither is the Bradley. China is the #1 shipper of goods on the planet. You really think they can keep your local Walmart stocked from thousands of miles away, but can't figure out how to put tanks on boats?
    1
  9.  @SoloRenegade  The Bradley and Abrams were never designed for use in the US, as there is no country that can militarily invade it. They were both designed for use in Europe. Believe it or not, countries don't normally design vehicles strictly for use within their borders. In fact, it's very rare that when they do
    1
  10. America seems to be going the same route with xm30
    1