Comments by "Alfred Churchill" (@alfredchurchill2328) on "Ukraine Retreats From BAKHMUT" video.

Mudkip Z Leaving the city but racing down their flanks taking more ground in a week than Russia did in 2 months. The reality for Russia is it’s stuck stagnant in a war it can’t win. They are a spent and desperate force just waiting to get trashed on again like last summer after culminating in June. The build up of western trained soldiers and equipment has not hit the front yet. It’s going to prove an overmatch for Russia in the vector it’s pushed in. Fir the moment though Russia just need to solidify their flanks around bakhmut or actually lose bakhmut as they claim victory over it. Reminds me of when Germany owned 95% of Stalingrad only to be defeated. Damn, I do a better job at this than history legends.
6
@anaremelam5998 Russia is losing more. And the donations of military equipment to Ukraine, if it does not stop, means it’s inevitable Russia will be removed from Ukraine. They started their ‘offensive’ last November. Tell me how far they’ve come whilst sustaining higher rates of attrition in both men and equipment
4
After a few months of getting totally gutted by indirect tube and artillery fire. Not to mention being starved of supplies. They ran away because they literally were not an effective fighting force anymore. Furthermore, I literally had several clips of them being trashed on crossing the river by artillery. It was a resounding victory for Ukraine. Literally playing 4d chess whilst Russia was playing connect 4
4
@gilangputra7514 artillery is less accurate than the Ukrainians. Moreover, the VKS has proved to be almost non existent in any real effective CAS role for Russian soldiers. The VKS is an entirely different conversation on its own to be honest. Their capability has been shown up. Furthermore, Russia has been attacking defence in depth with very poorly trained, equipped, supported, led and motivated soldiers. To make things worse the way in which they utilise their soldiers is extremely costly. Especially in wagners 9 months battle going for bakhmut. The reality is Ukraine have attrited the Russians several times more than themselves.
2
@TheRealBillBob you’re clearly out of your depth here. Wagner proved in bakhmut it can sustain a kill/death ratio of 4:1 in ukraines favour and spent 10 months moving 5 miles and capture a town of 70k. This is embarrassing. Fir Ukraine bakhmut was important only as a place the Russians allowed themselves to be attritioned more than Ukraine. They succeeded fairly well there 😂👍
2
@3o3tigger You will have to do better than that. Try producing some substance on the subject matter to help your narrative. You look silly.
2
@Maik0341 so just laughed out loud at you. Ukraine barely lost a single soldier in he Kherson offevsive. Why? Because the Ukrainians starved and destroyed the Russians so heavily there that they just left without a fight. So the Ukrainians just walked into their positions. Lying to yourself won’t subtract from reality. Facts matter. Educate yourself. 👍
2
Leaving the city but racing down their flanks taking more ground in a week than Russia did in 2 months. The reality for Russia is it’s stuck stagnant in a war it can’t win. They are a spent and desperate force just waiting to get trashed on again like last summer after culminating in June. The build up of western trained soldiers and equipment has not hit the front yet. It’s going to prove an overmatch for Russia in the vector it’s pushed in. Fir the moment though Russia just need to solidify their flanks around bakhmut or actually lose bakhmut as they claim victory over it. Reminds me of when Germany owned 95% of Stalingrad only to be defeated. Damn history legends. I’m doing your job better than you
2
@Warren_Peace I do not disagree with you in regards to western support. Without it and Russia would eventually take the country and then endure an occupation 50x worse than America in Iraq. However, if the entire free democratic world do not stop supporting Ukraine it is inevitable that Russia will be removed from Ukraine. Crimea is another chapter/story. In reply to the first paragraph. People have been saying these things flippantly on both sides throughout. However, I’ve only said this when Russia looked to be actually culminating and on the back foot. This is what I see now. Let’s reminds ourselves as well that arguments for a Russian victory are pretty slim. They started their ‘offensive’ last November off the back of losing 60% of what they had at the apex of their invasion. Want to look at a map of how far they have come since then? Now overall as a fighting force I’ll also add that Russia really has illustrated over 15 months how they are not really an efficient and professional fighting force. It’s conventional land military capabilities have been shown up. The worlds perception of its capabilities has been pooped on for a couple generations. It’s not just that your Russian soldier is poorly trained, equipped, led, supported and motivated. There is literally not 2 of them that have the same fatigues and gear. It just looks like an oversized amateur operation. And this is against Ukraine given a fraction of NATO capability. Fir the most part it’s just been standard things like ATGM, armoured vehicles. Almost all tanks they’ve got are donated t72s or various other types from their best supplier, the Russians. So if the west now starts pumping in real gear it’s not not going to be sustainable for Russia in Ukraine. At least not the territory they still have. Lastly, you can’t ignore the standard of equipment left to send to the front. It’s been getting progressively worse over time. We know from satellite pictures of all their depots how many and the types before the war and now. Literally half their tanks are gone and their most numerous type of tanks left in storage to send are t50/60 series. They are of course producing new tanks. Albeit not faster than their attrition rate on the battlefield…
1
@zeffy._440 literally the opposite is true. Of more or less everything you said. Ironic AF Cope smarter. Not harder
1
@zeffy._440 pffft. Keep lying to yourself, fascist 😂👍
1
Leaving the city but racing down their flanks taking more ground in a week than Russia did in 2 months. The reality for Russia is it’s stuck stagnant in a war it can’t win. They are a spent and desperate force just waiting to get trashed on again like last summer after culminating in June. The build up of western trained soldiers and equipment has not hit the front yet. It’s going to prove an overmatch for Russia in the vector it’s pushed in. Fir the moment though Russia just need to solidify their flanks around bakhmut or actually lose bakhmut as they claim victory over it. Reminds me of when Germany owned 95% of Stalingrad only to be defeated. Damn, I do a better job at this than history legends.
1
@unbearifiedbear1885 nobody who knows what they’re looking at says Ukraine is losing. Russia started its ice dive last November off the back of losing 60% of what they took in the apex of their invasion. Since November wanna look on a map of what they taken? Exactly. The only ground Ukraine has given them is when they trade a little ground to keep the attrition rate in their favour. They’ve killed a lot more Russians. The reality fir Russia is they are culminating like last June. They are stuck stagnant in a war they can’t win and all the western trained soldiers and equipment has not hit the front yet. This will prove an overmatch fir Russia in the vector it’s pushed in. By most measures this has not just been 15 months of embarrassment for Russia. But they have shown the world their conventional land military is not only shockingly ineffective at fighting a war, but that half of it no longer exists. They’ve done irreversible damage to the worlds perception of their capabilities fir a couple generations. Moreover, Ukraine has demilitarised Russia so hard that they are no longer a threat to anyone in Europe for a couple decades. And that’s not taking into account sanctions or how losing this war might actually fracture Russia into smaller nations. Facts matter 👍
1
@gilangputra7514 firstly, on average Ukrainian artillery is absolutely more accurate. Secondly, Russia no longer has the capacity to sustain anything near the figure you pulled out your bum bum. Lastly, the only time there was encirclement and everyone captured is after Mariupol defenders ran out of food and ammo. Apart from that it’s been mostly fighting retreats, attriting the enemy more than them and shorter periods of liberating huge swaths of their territory and people. It’s been a failure for Russia and now they are just stuck and fcked. Don’t worry, they probably have another 1000 t50/60 series tanks to eat through 😂👍
1
@gilangputra7514 What a stupid comment. I’m convinced you couldn’t even tell me why it’s stupid on several levels either. You’re so out of your depth. For this reason, we are done on this one now. Cheers 👍
1
@escaped1534 Cope smarter. Not harder 👍
1
@3o3tigger Again you’ve failed to produce any substance on he subject matter to help your narrative. ‘Trust me bro’ is where you currently are. Unfortunately for yourself I’ve already torn your nonsense apart. Educate yourself and produce less nonsense. Cheers 👍
1
Leaving the city but racing down their flanks taking more ground in a week than Russia did in 2 months. The reality for Russia is it’s stuck stagnant in a war it can’t win. They are a spent and desperate force just waiting to get trashed on again like last summer after culminating in June. The build up of western trained soldiers and equipment has not hit the front yet. It’s going to prove an overmatch for Russia in the vector it’s pushed in. Fir the moment though Russia just need to solidify their flanks around bakhmut or actually lose bakhmut as they claim victory over it. Reminds me of when Germany owned 95% of Stalingrad only to be defeated. Damn, I do a better job at this than history legends.
1
@leroyanthony1208 what I said was accurate. If they go at this rate they will reach the far end outskirts of bakhmut in like 3 weeks or so. How long did it take for Russia to travel 5 miles and then take bakhmut whilst sustaining horrific casualties? The Ukrainians when not on the offensive liberating huge swaths of its land and people have spent most of the war fighting a fighting retreat. Defending and attriting the enemy more then yourself. Once that attrition rate even out you trade a little ground and repeat until your enemy has culminated. Well Russia is kind of culminating right now. So we see Ukraine doing recon by fire now with success in some areas being exploited once it was found the Russians felt like crumbling. No new troops or western equipment has even helped with this. It’s looking pretty bad for Russia. It’s going to be another rough summer for them. A betting man says they’d do really well to still hold what they got come end of summer.
1
@leroyanthony1208 I do not disagree there. This week we will see if they can move on that town and keep momentum. Honestly, I don’t fancy the Russian chances. They just look a weak and desperate force. The Ukrainians have their tails up, have their country, freedom and families to fight for. The Russians motivation is a pay cheque they may or may not get
1
Leaving the city but racing down their flanks taking more ground in a week than Russia did in 2 months. The reality for Russia is it’s stuck stagnant in a war it can’t win. They are a spent and desperate force just waiting to get trashed on again like last summer after culminating in June. The build up of western trained soldiers and equipment has not hit the front yet. It’s going to prove an overmatch for Russia in the vector it’s pushed in. Fir the moment though Russia just need to solidify their flanks around bakhmut or actually lose bakhmut as they claim victory over it. Reminds me of when Germany owned 95% of Stalingrad only to be defeated. Damn, I do a better job at this than history legends.
1