Comments by "ashley bishop" (@ashleybishop7248) on "Fox Guest LIES About Democrats Killing Babies After Birth" video.

  1. It's none of Ana or Cenk's business what goes on in another state, but somehow it's YOUR business what goes on in someone else's body.
    9
  2. More dumb rhetoric.
    6
  3. A mindless, insensate, nonviable collection of tissue isn't a child.
    5
  4. Here is what actually went down: "The meme appears to inaccurately quote the remarks made by Democrat Ralph Northam during an interview with a local radio station in 2019 when asked about Bill HB 2491. Northam was referring to “third-trimester abortions” that are done in cases “where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s non viable” he said. “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,” Northam stated. This comment was quickly addressed by Republican commentators who, as reported by Vox here , took his words as “an endorsement of infanticide”. At the time, a spokesperson for Northam told Vox the “governor had ‘absolutely not’ been referring to the euthanasia of infants born after a failed abortion” and that he was talking about a “tragic and extremely rare case in which a woman with a nonviable pregnancy or severe fetal abnormalities went into labor.” Not sure what is confusing about "NON VIABLE."
    5
  5. Get your google fingers working and look up non viable. "There may be a fetus that’s non viable” he said. “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,” Northam stated. How is this different than doctors following DNR procedures? It ISN'T. There is NOTHING about the euthanasia of infants. He was referring to a "tragic and extremely rare case in which a woman with a nonviable pregnancy or severe fetal abnormalities went into labor.” Leave it to the DISGUSTING republicans to use a tragedy to further your insane, false narrative.
    4
  6. Or watch a delivery video on YouTube. Best contraception out there.
    4
  7.  @johhnylarue3273  Ever heard a woman say she has a bun in the oven? Did you believe the fetus was an actual bun or her uterus an oven because she used those words? And it doesn't matter what you call it - it is what it is.
    4
  8.  @jujumama  Not only that but they'll complain endlessly about their tax dollars supporting said children.
    3
  9. Something you don't understand about non viable? "Northam was referring to “third-trimester abortions” that are done in cases “where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s non viable” he said. “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,” Northam stated. This comment was quickly addressed by Republican commentators who, as reported by Vox here , took his words as “an endorsement of infanticide”. At the time, a spokesperson for Northam told Vox the “governor had ‘absolutely not’ been referring to the euthanasia of infants born after a failed abortion” and that he was talking about a “tragic and extremely rare case in which a woman with a nonviable pregnancy or severe fetal abnormalities went into labor.” Ya'll might as well be freaking out over doctors respecting a DNR.
    3
  10. That's not what the bill says at all. The protocols are EXACTLY the same as DNR protocols.
    3
  11.  @ladylaurus8493  You too. It's amazing how some people are so quick to repeat something they haven't actually listened to.
    3
  12. Don't care who you are or what you identify as - everyone should have the right to an abortion.
    3
  13. A mindless, insensate, nonviable collection of tissue is not a baby.
    2
  14.  @henrytawnn8694  Oh have anti-choicers moved on from the hokum that was "Silent Scream?" lol Nine out of 10 abortions happen before 12 weeks of pregnancy. Medical (drug induced) abortion accounts for at least half of all pregnancy terminations. So basically he wants us all to watch a YouTube video of a woman having a period.
    2
  15.  @theprodigalheel3942  Oh cool I didn't know we could choose where our tax dollars go ... like a charity. No more Viagra for you!
    2
  16. Brian Kurtz trots out a decade old article featuring the bizarre opinions of two philosophers as proof of some leftist conspiracy. 👇 No one gave these Bozos two afterthoughts. Try harder.
    2
  17.  @lindamcgehee7216  Since we're all about controlling people's sex lives and bodies and whatnot, just make it a crime for unmarried males to have sex without using a condom.
    1
  18.  @GrimdarkKing  When sperm meets egg... BAM! instant baby! Sorry, that's not how this works. The assertion that a package of DNA is a human being is laughable, and that's putting it mildly. The claim a single sperm is a human being makes as much biological sense. Women should not suffer because of your scientific ignorance. A human being is a biological organism composed of a specific type of organs and organ systems. That includes gasp a CNS. The cerebral cortex is part of that system. Without a functioning cerebral cortex there is no viability, no thought, no sensation, no self - awareness. Your feelings and emotions are irrelevant to biological fact. You don't get to make up reality.
    1
  19.  @GrimdarkKing  They are not babies. The majority of abortions don't involve a fetus anyway, they involve an embryo.
    1
  20. Meanwhile, there are machetes for you "tallywhacker" types.
    1
  21. So true. No one would deny that a sperm and an egg are living tissue, but no one would argue that they're human beings. Likewise only a fool would argue that once sperm meets egg... BAM! instant human. The rule of thumb, scientifically and biologically anyway, is that no functioning cerebral cortex = no ONE. People make the decision to remove loved ones from life support all the time, and DNR's are pretty routine. Yet not one of these republicans is screaming about these people being murdered. Mainly because they aren't.
    1
  22. Yeah, back when republicans actually held seditionists to account.
    1
  23. A mindless, insensate, nonviable collection of tissue isn't a baby. No functioning cerebral cortex = no thought, no feeling, no self awareness, no ONE. Being ignorant of science doesn't give you the moral high ground. It just makes you stupid.
    1
  24. 2000 mules. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  25. This is a lie. I've quoted exactly what he said over four times to fck'n idiots who can't be arsed to look it up themselves. I suggest you look up what he said and then come back and apologize for lying your ass off.
    1
  26. No one forced you to have a vaccine. No one held you down and stuck a needle in your arm you lunatic.
    1
  27.  @governmentcheese7726  Thanks for proving that anti-choicers don't care about kids at all. Your skreed is ironically delicious.
    1
  28. No it isn't. Even before Roe v Wade abortion wasn't considered murder. This is just pearl clutching from right wing lunatics.
    1
  29. Like your mother should have.
    1
  30. All the more reason she should have the option to remove it from HER body.
    1
  31. Spew and dribble, misogynist.
    1
  32. This is how dumb the right is. You believe that once sperm meets egg you get an instant baby.
    1
  33. The baby WILL die. Look up what non viable means. This is no different than doctors following DNR protocols.
    1