Comments by "T Brown" (@tbrown3356) on "LADbible Stories" channel.

  1. Put an old man in front of him talking about philosophy. Lol.
    39
  2. Please provide the scientific hypothesis (dependent variable and independent variable) of any experiment proving we live on a spinning ball.
    6
  3. Can't have gas pressure without a container. If a sky vacuum was above us then our air would escape. It's entropy and gas laws that debunk outerspace.
    6
  4. George Musser PhD Astrophysics Dr. Georgy: “We can, We do, We must, consider Newtonian Gravity as a force. Now that doesn’t really mean it is one, but we don’t necessarily have to work on the REALLY IS level.” https://youtu.be/SK9-gYCKKqA Dr. Georgy: “Gravity is NOT A FORCE but you can think of it as A FORCE“. https://youtu.be/SK9-gYCKKqA
    5
  5. Neil Degrasse Tyson says you can't see curvature from 120,000 feet up. Not going to see it from 35,000 feet up. Lol.
    5
  6.  @mrxexes  People get sick so that would be feeling a virus. And the fact that we never experience earth moving coupled with no evidence we are logically makes sense that earth is not moving. Add to that earth doesn't turn underneath a drone helicopter or airplane, I'd say it's very clear earth is stationary. But you can still choose to believe that we are whirling through a vacuum chasing the sun. Lol.
    5
  7.  @beelzzebub  Appeal to concensus fallacy. The truth doesn't depend on if Majority of people believe it. "In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition must be true because many or most people believe it, often concisely encapsulated as: "If many believe so, it is so". Wikipedia
    4
  8. CC.12 The Coriolis Effect : When set in motion, freely moving objects, including AIR [ Atmosphere ] and WATER masses [ Clouds/Water Vapor ], move in straight paths while the Earth continues to                     ROTATE INDEPENDENTLY Because freely moving objects ARE NOT carried with the Earth as it Rotates, they are subject to an APPARENT DEFLECTION called the “Coriolis Effect.” To an observer rotating with the Earth, freely moving objects that travel in a straight line APPEAR to travel in a curved path on the Earth.” Segar, Douglas A; Introduction to Ocean Sciences, 2nd Edition: Critical Concept Reminders — CC.12 The Coriolis Effect (pp. 313, 314, 323, 324), ISBN: 978-0-393-92629-3, 2007. http://www.wwnorton.com/college/geo/oceansci/cc/cc12.html We now know that earth is stationary and there is no earth-based coriolis. If the earth turned then it would turn underneath a drone helicopter or airplane. A drone or helicopter could hover and have destinations come to them. A flight from Charlotte NC to Los Angeles California would take an hour and a half. That doesn't happen because the earth is not turning.
    4
  9. The old guy was not that loud. Lol.
    4
  10. What? Now you have to make up arguments to argue against. Ever heard of straw man fallacy? Lol.
    4
  11. "Wikipedia › wiki › Gravity Gravity - Wikipedia Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity (proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915), which describes gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass" Sounds like Newton was wrong in your own religion/model. Gravity is just assumed and can't be scientifically proven.
    4
  12. Yeah I wish the claimed scientist would have actually said something scientific. Lol.
    4
  13. Well it was fun making you globies squeal. Gotta get back to reality now guys. Carry on talking about magic. Lol.
    4
  14.  @Captain_Pudding  Your original claim was the horizon is obstructing the platforms. Decided to use the refraction argument now? Lol.
    4
  15.  @jarodstrain8905  And you just literally typed that we don't see physical objects. WTF? Lol. You are so lost. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    4
  16.  @jonathanconnor7920  You believe I have lost an argument when you have 3 globies here with 3 different stories. Captain sees the horizon obstructing the platforms. Jonathan believes refraction brings the horizon from in front of the platforms to behind like magic. Jarod beliefs we are seeing over Earth curve to objects behind it like magic. So we have 1 blind guy and 2 guys believing in magic. Lol.
    4
  17.  @jarodstrain8905  From Jonathan who claimed refraction is making us see through earth curve. Lol. You have yet a different story about seeing around objects. Lol. That's just as magical. You want people to believe we are seeing over Earth curve and objects are then made to appear standing perpendicular. Lol. Globies believe they can see through and over physical barriers now. Lol. Anything to hold on to your model.
    4
  18.  @jonathanconnor7920  Are you going to show refraction moving a physical barrier from in front of an object to behind it? Or do you concede that refraction can't do this but you believe in magic? Lol.
    4
  19.  @jonathanconnor7920  Another video from a different day. Is your sphere only a sphere on most days? Lol. Refraction cannot move the horizon if it's earth curve from being in front of platforms one day and behind them on another day. Lol. Refraction is not magic. Lol.
    4
  20.  @jonathanconnor7920  Nobody makes 3 right angle turns to form a triangle. Your triangle argument is conceptual. And the black swan destroys the sphere. Just takes one day of a geometric impossibility to prove that we don't live on a sphere. In reality there are many black swans.
    4
  21.  @arkimus1911  Doesn't matter how much distortion is on the platforms. They are set at a distance. The only purpose for them is to show you globeheads that the horizon is farther than your sphere allows. RIP globe. Lol. Now you grow up. Everything you were taught as a kid is not true. Santa Claus, the tooth fairy, and the globe are all just fun stories but as an adult are absurd. Lol.
    4
  22.  @jonathanconnor7920  A video from a different day. Lol. Your physical sphere edge can't be moving from day to day. Just one day of it being farther than 9 miles away from an observer at 1 foot height debunks it being a sphere. Hence the name black swan.
    4
  23.  @Captain_Pudding  You are in serious denial if you can't see the horizon behind the second platform, or you need your eyes checked. Lol. You don't get to just declare where the horizon is. It's that crystal clear line where the sky APPEARS to meet the ground. Lol. Now you'll carry on about me being a troll and pretend that you don't see the debunking of your sphere model. That or you'll claim refraction has moved your sphere edge from being in front of the platforms to magically being behind the platforms. Lol.
    4
  24. Science is not a person but a method that validates cause-and-effect relationships. Science is also not a concensus. Look up scientific method.
    4
  25.  @RABIDJOCK  You can't love others if you don't love God. And if you love God then you love the truth and his word. God bless you brother.
    3
  26.  @bigwhopper6501  Suddenly, you are an expert on what physisists do. Lol. You claimed that theoretical physisists assume things and then experiments are done by physisists. Great! Let's have the hypothesis (dependent variable and independent variable) for just one experiment in the entire history of science proving earth is a sphere or moving.
    3
  27.  @bigwhopper6501  What he is telling you is that he doesn't use the scientific method. Yet he is in a field called science. So the claims being made about black holes, galaxies, gravity, solar system are all just fly by the seat of your pants guesswork. He can't be more clear. "The Scientific Method “DISTINGUISHES SCIENCE” from other forms of explanation because of its Requirement of SYSTEMATIC EXPERIMENTATION.” http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixE/
    3
  28.  @bigwhopper6501  I can't have a rational conversation with you because you don't know what science is. And you are not willing to look into things because you are not an expert right? We should just trust guys like Michio Kaku right? Lol.
    3
  29.  @bigwhopper6501  It's in plain English. You need me to explain what he said to you. Lol. Have a great day.
    3
  30.  @bigwhopper6501  Because the scientific method can't be applied. Shapes are not something science deals with. Science deals with how and why questions, not what is questions. Pseudoscientists have convinced the masses that there's scientific evidence of a spinning ball, when there isn't.
    3
  31.  @GOODBOIN8  If you are still a globe believer after reading the comments from your 2 compadres here, then there's no helping you. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    3
  32.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  You just said that helium is leaving and at the same time said the air is a container itself. 😂😂😂😂😂 How is the air containing itself. That defies entropy which states that disorder always increases in time. "When a gas expands into a vacuum, its entropy increases because the increased volume allows for greater atomic or molecular disorder. ... The greater the number of atoms or molecules in the gas, the greater the disorder.Aug 14, 2020" LibreTexts › chem 18.3: Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics - Chemistry LibreTexts
    3
  33. Because earth is flat and stationary.
    3
  34.  @_61514  You're welcome. Most of the other commenters here are like cult members. They don't want their beliefs challenged. It makes them angry.
    3
  35.  @_61514  Thanks. I like Nathan Oakley 1980 or flat earth debate and Flat earth brothers. Give me a sec and I'll post the links.
    3
  36.  @jackevans7665  Just breathe and stop rapid firing off ignorant claims. Let it sink in that you don't live on a spinning water ball. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    3
  37.  @jackevans7665  do you understand that if the horizon is Earth curvature it must match with the claimed radius of the Earth? So based on the height of the observer you should be able to draw a tangent to the curvature. You can calculate the distance to that curvature with the formula I gave you. The problem for you and other Globe believers is that when we do that calculation the distance to the horizon is farther than the claimed radius. This proves that there is no geometric horizon or Earth curvature and therefore debunks a spherical Earth. Welcome to flat earth!!!
    3
  38.  @jackevans7665  You see curvature because it's in your mind. The bridge is parallel at the ends. And the horizon is claimed to be geometric earth curvature. Observations Debunked that claim. Earth's flat and stationary. Deal with it!
    3
  39.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  The horizon that we see is not earth curvature. You just argued that using zoom on a camera can push the horizon back farther than geometrically possible if the Earth were a sphere. No need for you to be angry. You've only admitted that we don't live on a ball. Life goes on. Earth is flat
    3
  40.  @fn4ndor  It's not my job to prove that the earth is flat and stationary. You have the Heliocentrism model that claims we're on a spinning ball whirling through a vacuum chasing the sun. But there's no proof of any of this. But just to be nice I'll give you my Flat earth proofs: https://globeterminator.com/the-black-swan/ https://globeterminator.com/flight/ https://globeterminator.com/no-vacuum-of-space/ https://globeterminator.com/coriolis/
    3
  41.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  Well I've heard all of your evidence and just as I said, it's all just the same old assumptions without evidence. Have a great day!
    3
  42.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  Galileo and Copernicus are just men looking at lights in the sky using their imaginations to try to make sense of the patterns they see. They never proved earth is a spinning ball in orbit.
    3
  43.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  I never claimed earth was a disc. That's a strawman argument. Earth is the dry plane we live on. How deep it goes down, I don't know. I'm not sure what you believe is impossible. Your compass attracts to the magnetic field. Going east is just circling the magnetic field. Simple.
    3
  44.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  If earth turns underneath a pendulum then that means it would turn underneath other objects including a drone helicopter or airplane. A drone or helicopter could hover and have destinations come to them. A flight from Charlotte NC to Los Angeles California would take an hour and a half. That doesn't happen however. So it's pretty dumb to believe earth only turns underneath a pendulum.
    3
  45.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  Now you're just naming people. What did Galileo observe?
    3
  46.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  I have not heard 1 proof that earth is a sphere. Just assumptions that can be easily debunked. Most people just allow you globe believing zealots to assume things.
    3
  47.  Roland Roland  No, I just won't accept you saying you have proof the earth is a spinning ball and then making a bunch of assumptions. You have no evidence that earth has geographical poles but you want me to assume there's celestial poles. You have no evidence earth is moving but you want me to assume it's like spinning in a room looking at the ceiling. Your model is not reality. It's all just imagination.
    3
  48.  Roland Roland  I think you are getting confused by your limited perspective of the sky. You just see a small sliver of the sky from where you are. Based on what direction you are facing the stars will appear to you to be rotating either clockwise or counterclockwise because again you are not seeing the entire sky at once.
    3
  49. Models are not reality. Models are not Science either. In reality earth is flat and we have sun arrivals and sun departures. And something called perspective.
    3
  50.  @nr197  Take it easy. Appreciate the peaceful dialogue.
    3