Comments by "Average Alien" (@AverageAlien) on "Using OpenTTD to answer “Who will build the roads?”" video.

  1. Me when I pull nonsense out of my ass
    3
  2. As if state employees don't profit. I'd rather have people earn their wealth than steal it by force
    2
  3. Cope and seethe more commie, your little midwit brain not being able to comprehend basic concepts outside of state tyranny isn't TIKs fault
    2
  4. Natural selection > rules and regulations
    2
  5. Railways. Next.
    2
  6. America is socialist
    2
  7. ​@LudvigNystedt best thing in the world
    2
  8. You are the only one making that claim. Taxation is evil. So that leaves us with the free market as the only moral solution.
    2
  9. @testname3829 what is there to explain? Theft is evil. The free market is the only working system and the only system with basic human rights allowed
    2
  10. No it wouldn't be tax, you couldn't force people to use your road and pay for it. You could set up a toll, and that's about it. Tolls would reduce pollution and traffic.
    2
  11.  @Baryonyx_Walkeri_62  It wouldn't be attached to my property without my permission or without me getting free use of it. It would work out cheaper without taxes and other fees and regulations and tolls would be cheap
    2
  12. "Ecological impact" Sorry this isn't the gay club pal
    2
  13. Monopolies are prevented by natural market forces such as competition. Bigger companies get more and more expensive and can be undercut easily when we remove the regulations and price controls. Corporations are not capitalist, they are socialist.
    2
  14.  @danielrussell5687  thanks to the socialist state meddling with the economy. Monopolies are created by regulation, taxation, and subsidies.
    2
  15. People wouldn't dig up roads for no reason without a demand for a road. Nobody would spend their time building unnecessary roads for the sake of "competition". Tolls would be beneficial and reduce pollution and traffic.
    2
  16. Low IQ moment
    2
  17. It would cost a fraction of what it costs the state. No middle men, no politicians to pay off, no unions, no regulations, no fees, no nonsense.
    2
  18. They don't, mong
    2
  19. No coherent counter, cry and seethe more commie
    2
  20. Yes, correct, things that don't benefit people won't be made. Congratulations Sherlock
    2
  21.  @mosesracal6758  Wrong. Money would be spent efficiently, no money would be wasted going into the pockets of useless politicians and other beaurocratic nonsense. No one could just park a camper van in the middle of the road because it's private property and they can and would be removed by force if they did so. People block public roads with things like protests now days. This wouldn't happen on a private road, let's just say. Making something exclusive is absolutely anarchist. Anarchy just means without state.
    1
  22.  @mosesracal6758  Insurance would provide any security needs. Private roads have existed for thousands of years, you don't need a useless middleman to maintain roads. Rules can be imposed without a government. The rules will be based on natural law based on non aggression principle. Not someone's made up laws. Cartels don't last in a true free market. You can have big businesses, but the bigger the business, the more moving parts, the less efficient it is, and the easier it is to undercut, provided there are no regulations or other oppressive pro cartel laws.
    1