Comments by "Dreamy Cheshire" (@DreamyCheshire-up9rf) on "BBC News" channel.

  1.  @niblet112  that't their citizens problems, NATO countries following USA not bankrupt.
    1
  2. No need to calm down. Ukraine is fighting a war on NATO behalf. Imagine being backstabbed by a group of "friends".
    1
  3. The hand should slap Ukraine.
    1
  4. Simple. The western world stop supporting Ukraine to avoid bankrupt. Without supports, Ukraine has to negotiate for peace. War ends.
    1
  5. The thing was NATO refused Zelensky to buy fire insurance even before his house got burnt. Now NATO said Ukraine has to end the war before joining the organization, while Russia could never end this war unless Ukraine becomes a permanent neutral country. It seems that USA and Europe have to support Ukraine for decades to come. If USA and Taliban could fight a 20 years war, so could NATO/Ukraine against Russia.
    1
  6. Ukraine could not get into NATO after the war because Russia demand Ukraine to be a permanent neutral state.
    1
  7.  @cog600  The original comment stated that Poland would only be a transport hub for allied hardwares to Ukraine.
    1
  8. The thing was the "insurance company" refused Zelensky to buy insurance when the car is functional.
    1
  9. Zelensky tried to get home insurance before the house is on fire but was rejected. Once NATO stops their support to Ukraine, the war would stop soon.
    1
  10. Imagine fighting for the very people who refused you to join their club.
    1
  11.  @Kraken54321  NATO/EU, of course. Who are you referring in your original comment ?
    1
  12. You forgot about the bombardment of USA/NATO with the killing of Gadaffi.
    1
  13. Now ? The offensive organization already mass bombed Libya.
    1
  14. Not so. The honour belonged to USA which recruited and trained Osama bin Laden to be the world 1st terrorist leader.
    1
  15. Except that Japan has no courage to use the Fukushima "safe" water.
    1
  16.  @YouTubemessedupmyhandle  For the sake of power, Putin could not give up what's been occupied. NATO countries' leaders do not have this problem. Beside, more and more protests from NATO citizens against the "ungrateful" Ukraine. Thus, its easier for NATO to give up on Ukraine so that it would negotiate for peace and end the war. For the last 50 years, civilised world of NATO in Europe had accepted the idea of USA taking bits of another country. Even now, USA occupied parts of Syria and stealing its oil. Also, Russia had occupied Crimea since 2014 and NATO was OK with that, so no problem for NATO to accept Russia occupied additional 4 regions.
    1
  17. Yeah. NATO was weak at that time due to sub-prime crisis.
    1
  18. Then its a "justified" blackmailing.
    1
  19. Imagine inhereting millions or billions in advance !
    1
  20. The sub got no homing device.
    1
  21. Micro Titanic 2 would be found, a hundred years later. Then become a tourist attraction for the rich.
    1
  22. Its the risk they had to take, for the thrill of their lifetime.
    1
  23. Cut costs ?
    1
  24. More like cut costs.
    1
  25. The life of a few rich guys in a sucken sub got more western media coverage, than the tragedy of a few hundred refugees in a sucken boat. LOL ( sarcastic ).
    1
  26. Dual citizenship ?
    1
  27. Maybe their "life" got more media coverage than those hundreds of refugees in the sucken boat a few days ago ?
    1
  28. Their siblings/children and relatives would be jumping for joy.
    1
  29. Cut costs ?
    1
  30. Damn. Biogas replacing oxygen ?
    1
  31. Now, Micro Titanic 2 would accompany it.
    1
  32. Now, The old lady would have young men for companionShip.
    1
  33. For those eyeing on their wealth. Nooooo.........
    1
  34. Cut costs ?
    1
  35. Don't be naive. Of course, taxpayers pay.
    1
  36. Europe had designated nuclear power as green energy and they are building more nuclear power plants.
    1
  37.  @danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk  Yeah. Except only Japan is releasing direct nuclear contaminated water.
    1
  38.  @BishakaPande  The "global water problem" is too much for a single country, Japan to tackle. Yet, "the World" didn't come together. The scientists didn't offer "viable" solutions, with 1st world rich countries offering resources to help solve the imminent "problem". Nations and its people only know how to complain and "scold", without doing anything to save Humanity evolving to "X-men" in future.
    1
  39. As you said, "the whole world is seeing global warming", yet Europe still burned lignite, coal and firewoods etc in winter 2022. It even classified firewoods as "renewable energy"..... and no global actions against their criminal acts. So perhaps Japan learnt the "lesson" and decide to dump "safe water" into the ocean.
    1
  40. There's no other solution since no other country is willing to help store nuclear waste water from Japan.
    1
  41. They are more concern about Russo-Ukraine war and France mob "protests".
    1
  42. No. Except that Japanese would be reluctant to eat sushi, sashimi and other seafood from Japan in future.
    1
  43.  @andrewjones-productions  Except that produce from Fukushima seemed to be cheaper than the rest of Japan, and the wordings of place of origin smaller.
    1
  44. Nowadays Zelensky doesn't demand help, he begs.
    1
  45. Those scientists never expect the building's water cooling system to fail after the earthquate and tsunami on the same day.
    1
  46. Perhaps they are protesting for their livelihood ?
    1
  47.  @nerosneros1670  I doubt Putin would want to conquer the whole Ukraine, given the battles only restricted to South-East Ukraine and he had withdrew from North Ukraine in 2022.
    1
  48. Since European countries are becoming intolerable to the muslim refugees, perhaps they could re-send them to Islamic countries ?
    1
  49. In years to come, the oceans would be "nuclear enriched" from Japan.
    1
  50. No money, no redone.
    1