General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Above Ground
The Young Turks
comments
Comments by "Above Ground" (@Above-Ground) on "How YouTube "Radicalizes" The Alt-Right" video.
A rare moment of candor from Alt-Right founder Richard Spencer : "Leftists who sometimes understand us better than we understand ourselves, have always sensed this; they know that when we talk about immigration, we’re not really talking about immigration."
12
Meanwhile, A federal appeals court upheld a ruling that Trump’s habit of blocking Twitter users he disagrees with violates the First Amendment. A unanimous panel of judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit upheld the ruling finding Trump’s prolific use of Twitter for official purposes means that blocking users for being critical amounts to discrimination based on their viewpoints.
7
@juntamomonari2922 He is an unhinged White Supremacist and a neo-Nazi. Try to keep up... "Does human civilization actually need the black race? Is black genocide right?" "What would be the best and easiest way to dispose of them?" -Richard Spencer. "The ideal I advocate is the creation of a White Ethno-State on the North American continent." -Richard Spencer.
6
The term "alt right" was coined by White Supremacist Richard Spencer.
5
@AlbertoGarcia-yb4ih I think you missed this : "The ideal I advocate is the creation of a White Ethno-State on the North American continent." -Richard Spencer.
5
The federal appeals court ruling on Trump’s habit of blocking Twitter users he disagrees with, states : "In resolving this appeal, we remind the litigants and the public that if the First Amendment means anything, it means that the best response to disfavored speech on matters of public concern is more speech, not less."
4
Once again, The Deplorables reveal how unhinged they are. Read on...
4
@AlbertoGarcia-yb4ih Tolerance of White Supremacists and neo-Nazis? No thanks...
4
@Piromysl359 <<< The usual babbling gibberish. And a sad deflection. Yawn...
4
Weak troll...
4
Psycho troll.
4
@NPC-mf3gr The federal appeals court ruling on Trump’s habit of blocking Twitter users he disagrees with, states : "In resolving this appeal, we remind the litigants and the public that if the First Amendment means anything, it means that the best response to disfavored speech on matters of public concern is more speech, not less."
4
@AlbertoGarcia-yb4ih <<< Babbling gibberish...
3
@AlbertoGarcia-yb4ih <<< Weak.
3
“We’re the platform for the alt-right.” -Steve Bannon speaking on behalf of Breitbart.
3
@AlbertoGarcia-yb4ih says : "No where there does he say "I advocate for genocide". I think you missed this : "Does human civilization actually need the black race? Is black genocide right?" "What would be the best and easiest way to dispose of them?" -Richard Spencer.
3
The B-Team of trolls have arrived. Read on...
3
@Piromysl359 Still deflecting I see... BTW, can you translate this into English for me? >>> "They totally will not backfire leftists into faces"
3
@AlbertoGarcia-yb4ih Meanwhile, A federal appeals court upheld a ruling that Trump’s habit of blocking Twitter users he disagrees with violates the First Amendment. A unanimous panel of judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit upheld the ruling finding Trump’s prolific use of Twitter for official purposes means that blocking users for being critical amounts to discrimination based on their viewpoints.
2
@AlbertoGarcia-yb4ih Alt-Right founder Richard Spencer : "The ideal I advocate is the creation of a White Ethno-State on the North American continent."
2
Know Thanks Nothing?
1
Know Thanks Really? I can't find that anywhere. Do you have a quote?
1
A sociopath uses the name of a fictional sociopath. ^^^ Wild.
1
@Keyser666 To an empty load of obvious BS...
1
Know Thanks What is the JQ?
1
@Piromysl359 This is English? >>> "They totally will not backfire leftists into faces"
1
@Piromysl359 One instance? Laughable. Nice try troll... A proper argument? To this? A federal appeals court upheld a ruling that Trump’s habit of blocking Twitter users he disagrees with violates the First Amendment. A unanimous panel of judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit upheld the ruling finding Trump’s prolific use of Twitter for official purposes means that blocking users for being critical amounts to discrimination based on their viewpoints. Your "argument"? : "They totally will not backfire leftists into faces" Blib, blah, gibber jabber blib, blib...
1
Islam is cancer Say what, George?
1
@LesterBrunt says: "I thought you progressives hate free speech" Nah, that's just delusional gibberish concocted from the unhinged voices in your head. And a sad deflection.
1