Comments by "Above Ground" (@Above-Ground) on "Classified Documents Found in Biden's Old Office, How It's Different Than Trump's Story" video.

  1. Nah, that's just you trolling...
    8
  2. Silly troll...
    5
  3. Troll.
    5
  4.  @adampike3834  Troll says what?
    5
  5. What election are you referring to?
    4
  6. Trolling gibberish.
    3
  7. Silly troll...
    3
  8. Gibberish. BTW, there appears to be a problem with your caps-lock.
    3
  9.  @adampike3834  That's just fascinating, troll.
    3
  10.  @adampike3834  Troll on... Wait, have you been trolling here for YEARS? Sad.
    3
  11. What's so astonishing, would be if anyone cared about your disingenuous drivel...
    2
  12. Proud Ally aka: Toxically Masculine aka: The Truth Teller aka: Your Friend Ted This troll is an imposter.
    2
  13.  @gemcan54  Damn, that's some magnificent projection. Well done !
    2
  14. Troll.
    1
  15.  @samppasamFIN  What "public records"? Let's see them.
    1
  16.  @bugsy9007  ​“The Penn Biden Center has never solicited or received any gifts from any Chinese or other foreign entity. In fact, the University has never solicited any gifts for the Center,” University of Pennsylvania spokesman Stephen MacCarthy said. The center’s mission statement says it does not accept contributions.
    1
  17.  @bugsy9007  Really? No shit? Tell that to The Penn Biden Center, among others. “The Penn Biden Center has never solicited or received any gifts from any Chinese or other foreign entity. In fact, the University has never solicited any gifts for the Center,” University of Pennsylvania spokesman Stephen MacCarthy said.
    1
  18.  @bugsy9007  "Open source info" from who?
    1
  19.  @bugsy9007  C'mon, let's see that "Open source info." What are you waiting for?
    1
  20. "New York Post" is not "Open source info," dimwit. Try again...
    1
  21.  @bugsy9007  Open source is derived from data and information that is available to the general public. Let's see it.
    1
  22.  @bugsy9007  The New York Post, a conservative daily tabloid says; according to public records. Let's see those public records. You're up.
    1
  23.  @bugsy9007  C'mon, let's see those public records. Stop dancing. You're up.
    1
  24.  @bugsy9007  Instead of posting your extensive "research" from a conservative daily tabloid and a digital editor for Fox News from years ago, who BTW, do not link to these "public records," why don't you step up to the plate and post these "public records," right here? What's the hold up?
    1
  25.  @bugsy9007  The point is, Penn is disputing that they ever got any donations from China. “The Penn Biden Center has never solicited or received any gifts from any Chinese or other foreign entity. In fact, the University has never solicited any gifts for the Center,” University of Pennsylvania spokesman Stephen MacCarthy said. You've run out of dance floor, Meyer...
    1
  26.  @bugsy9007  I'm still waiting to see those "public records." Will they be forthcoming any time soon? You can settle this here and now.
    1
  27.  @bugsy9007  So, nothin'? You've got nothin' on those "open source public records" ? Just some dweeb who posted some blog on January 10, 2023 under the moniker "Constitutional Nobody" ? Always every inch the babbling fool. Waaay, too easy. Or, do you mean the "story" that went completely dead after January 19, 2021? P.S. Still waiting...
    1
  28.  @bugsy9007  Oh BTW, the AP did not run that story, lying, trolling sociopath. Only alt-right lunatics run "stories" in ALL CAPS.
    1
  29. It was immediately told when it was found out.
    1
  30.  @wnf7533  Apparently so...
    1
  31. It’s amazing to see this troll who claimed that the Democrat Party started the KKK, is still here. Especially after I slapped him silly with facts. And of course, he ran away like a little girl like the coward that he is...
    1
  32.  @survivinginflation8579  The Democrat Party did not form the KKK. I never denied Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. These are delusions that you have concocted from those deranged voices screaming in your head.
    1
  33.  @survivinginflation8579  BTW, you're illiterate.
    1
  34.  @logicalanswer3529  <<< Joined Nov 2, 2022. Trolling loser.
    1
  35.  @survivinginflation8579  In 1865, at the conclusion of the Civil War, six Confederate veterans gathered in Pulaski, Tennessee, to create the Ku Klux Klan, a vigilante group mobilizing a campaign of violence and terror against the progress of Reconstruction. As the group gained members from all strata of Southern white society, they used violent intimidation to prevent Black Americans – and any white people who supported Reconstruction – from voting and holding political office. The first leader, or “grand wizard” of the Ku Klux Klan, was Nathan Bedford Forrest, a well-known Confederate general.
    1
  36.  @survivinginflation8579  The trash talking of "Surviving Inflation": "Your ignorant!" "You don’t have a job and are a loser" "You have to ask your mommy for 50 bucks." "You don’t have a job" Which is actually, some magnificent projection, BTW. "Your [sic] ignorant!" being my favorite...
    1
  37.  @survivinginflation8579  YouTube is trying to play games with what? And who told you that "they were all members of the southern “democratic party”? Have you acquired their voting records?
    1
  38.  @survivinginflation8579  In the United States, Southern Unionists were white Southerners living in the Confederate States of America opposed to secession. Many fought for the Union during the Civil War. These people are also referred to as Southern Loyalists, Union Loyalists, or Lincoln's Loyalists. Southern Unionists in Alabama who continued to support the Union during the war were typically "Jackson" conservative Democrats, or former Whigs, who viewed the federal government as worthy of defending because it had provided economic and political security. They saw secession as dangerous, illegitimate, and contrary to the intentions of the Founding Fathers, and believed that the Confederacy could not improve on the United States government.
    1
  39.  @survivinginflation8579  The desire for security was a motivation for Unionist slaveholders, who feared that secession would cause a conflict that would result in the loss of their slaves; however, some stated that they would rather give up slavery than dissolve the Union. They believed that rebelling against the United States, which many of their ancestors had fought for in 1776 and 1812, was the unmanly and dishonorable act.
    1
  40.  @survivinginflation8579  The trash talking of "Surviving Inflation" continues: "You are one of these young spoiled kids" "You my feeble minded fellow earthling" " You probably make no money playing your video games" "Your ignorant!" "You don’t have a job and are a loser" "You have to ask your mommy for 50 bucks." "You don’t have a job" Which is actually, more magnificent projection, BTW. "Your [sic] ignorant!" is still my favorite...
    1
  41.  @survivinginflation8579  I past stuff that you don’t know or refuse to understand. Are you still doing your impression of an Ostrich?
    1
  42.  @survivinginflation8579  The Democrat party did not fight to keep slavery. The Democrat party did not start the KKK. Stop lying and trolling on the job and educate yourself, sociopath.
    1
  43. How so?
    1
  44.  @rickrodriguez4032  Why no-life troll, whose Channel Description is Trolling? Can't you? Let's hear it.
    1
  45. Daily troll. This clown is a real sociopath.
    1
  46. § 2.2 Access to classified information by historical researchers, former Treasury Presidential and Vice Presidential appointees, and former Presidents and Vice Presidents. (a) Access to classified information may be granted only to individuals who have a need-to-know the information. This requirement may be waived, however, for individuals who: (1) Are engaged in historical research projects; (2) Previously occupied a position in the Treasury to which they were appointed by the President under 3 U.S.C. 105(a)(2)(A), or the Vice President under 3 U.S.C. 106(a)(1)(A); or (3) Served as President or Vice President.
    1