General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Clint Holmes
The Rational National
comments
Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Bernie: 'The Most Important Issue Is Campaign Finance Reform'" video.
Actually how rich the owner of the company is is very relevant. They wouldn't be as rich as they are if, like you said, that box folder wasn't bringing value. They clearly are. For example McDonalds profiting billions every year proves burger flippers are worth more than what they are getting paid.
6
Michael do you want to flip burgers? I sure as fuck don't. You know why? Because that job fucking sucks. They are worth every penny they get paid and significantly more because, like I pointed out, McDonalds makes billions from their labor.
2
Regarding, "JD do not treat campaign finance reform as the #1 issue" Um what? It is literally the first thing they mention on their platform. https://www.justicedemocrats.com/platform
2
You are why Trump loves the uneducated.
2
I don't understand why your comments don't get significantly more thumbs up because they are always true. I wish I were a youtube superdelegate so that I could give them a few thousand thumbs up.
1
Which is made all but impossible because of money in politics fucking everything else up.
1
I agree that Citizens United needs to go and it exacerbated the problem but understand that money in politics was a problem before it.
1
Regarding, "there isn't a single Republican on the list." They are called justice DEMOCRATS not justice REPUBLICANS.
1
Wolf PAC is not a group of people running for office. That is why they are able to focus exclusively on a single issue. You can't do that if you run for office. You are comparing apples and oranges.
1
You are being ridiculous. These are people that are trying to run as, and I'm not sure how many more times I need to point this out DEMOCRATS. You should not have so much trouble understanding this. It is literally part of their name. Whether you like it or not that is suppose to mean something. The justice part means that they are prioritizing getting money out of politics and are going to run their campaign a certain a way. You don't want to support them? Fine. You don't want to donate to them? Fine. You want to start your own political party where the only requirement is a desire to get money out of politics? Fine. But I would really appreciate it if you wouldn't outright lie and say bullshit like, "JD democrats do not treat campaign finance reform as the number one issue," even thou they do, because you have a problem with their stance on other issues and because they choose to take a position on other issues. Regarding, "you should be taking every republican" Whether or not you want to face reality the words democrat and republican mean certain things. I would encourage republicans to focus on getting money out of politics the same way JD do. But that would make them justice republicans because words have meaning.
1
Regarding, "If you prioritized CFR above party affiliation then you wouldn't have a purity test on other pet issues that have nothing to do with CFR." Worst. "Logic." Ever. There is a purity test when it comes to CFR. From their cite, "All candidates are REQUIRED to pledge not to take any corporate PAC or corporate lobbyist money." Despite this you don't say "If you prioritized other pet issues above CFR then you wouldn't have a purity test on CFR that have nothing to do with pet issues" even thou it would make sense according to your own idiotic "logic" because that isn't the BS narrative you are trying to push. As for the "purity test" when it comes to everything else, (again from their own cite) "Additionally, they will be progressive candidates who GENERALLY agree with the JD platform." (Note we should add, "JD will not support a candidate who does not support all of their progressive priorities" to the list of your lies.) So which is the priority? The area that is an actual litmus test and inflexible or the area that is flexible? Yes. You are absolutely are lying. Try not to lie to yourself about it the way you lie to everyone else. https://www.justicedemocrats.com/about
1
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and think that you just have trouble understanding the meaning of words are not intentionally lying. That said you are definitely a liar. Priority does not mean, "nothing else matters and if something else matters it isn't a priority" like you seem to think. You are looking for exclusivity not priority. They mean very different things.
1
But you know what, I'm done caring what you think. But I again encourage you to refrain from lying in the future to make your terrible points.
1
You can't even spell socialist correctly for fucks sake when we were suppose to be talking about commies. You think the things you do because you are not smart.
1
Wait, I am confused, is he a communist or a socialist? You don't have to answer it is rhetorical. I don't actually care what you think but good luck with the whole stupid as fuck thing you got going on.
1
That is a compliment considering the source. Thank you. I appreciate it.
1
You were just saying you didn't care what I think and now you are telling me to watch your trash videos as if you do care. You are confusing me again. I want to call you a moron but that would be insulting to morons. You remind me of the guy in Idiocracy who got paid to say "brought to you by Carl's Jr" but it's as if you get paid to say "libtard" and are significantly dumber.
1
You forgot to call me a libtard dipshit.
1
It would be interesting but sadly it isn't going to be happening anytime soon. The last hope for something like that was when Feingold and McCain tried to get money out of politics. Then citizens united happened and things have only gotten worse. The common ground you were talking about refers to the peasants. There is no coalition to be had among politicians on any of those issues. Both major parties overwhelmingly love money in politics, war, corporate welfare and eroding civil liberties.
1