Comments by "Cultugarve Algarve" (@cultugarvealgarve7380) on "Anders Puck Nielsen"
channel.
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
Unfortunally, it s the very negative option, from the start, as what we saw until now, 2 years later,only incremental aid, with no any outlook on the smallest improvement.
The Nato is already split by Putin, ruling the US house, and more maga will fill the ranks, there, as the traditional republicans, thank for it. So what in case art. 5?? not very much it seems.
So even if Trump will lose, the house stays under Putin.
For the European Nato, complete powerless, it might be worse after the june 2024 EU elections.
The EU cold simply buy US weapons, but untill now, excuses only.
Don t forget the partycenter EU, eternal ,,peace for our time 1938 hobby,, after 1918, 1933/1938/45 and now in 2024.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bahkmut became a symbolic battle, Russia hadn t received any result during that winter and end mai Pregoishin told that he didn t like to go on, so destroying Wagner. So it became a ,,phiric,, propaganda temporally victory, confirmed by the current situation.
Attacking towns or buildings is anyway the disadvantage for the attackers, wagner not excluded.
To defend fixed positions one needs less ,,quality,, soldiers, as we see today on the Russian front lines.
The Ukraine is very carefull to save human lives, so going slow till today, and for that reason they slowly gave up Bahkmut, not giving the Russian time to built much defense lines behind Bahkmut. It s for Russia still a symbolic battle, because Bahkmut hasn t had the very stratetic position ever. Still more than 50.000 Russian soldiers are busy there, and the last days the Russian have to send more and more troops and gear, to stop the Ukraine.
So i think it was and is still worth going on in Bahkmut, keeping those 50.000 russian there.
In the north the Russians can t cross the Oskil river, but in the south the Ukraine does cross the Dnipro river.
1
-
There will be no attack soon, but mainly a stratigic trick. They are starving the Russian 30.000 strong army in the trap. They can t go anywhere, no logistics all, the bridges destoyed, and again
Like Russia used first WW grinding tactics, the ukraine uses medieval tactics now. Combined with sniper artillery. So not to expect any WWII clash at all. It s the chips that rule, complex electronics, that in the end may save lives on both sides, when the Russian machines etc. are gone, the game is over, that s all.
There is never any hurry been in starving out fixed enemies, the time will do it.
And sniper artillerie finishes it slowly on that island, Slowly grinding like Russia did, but no way out. This army is not available else anymore. On the rest front is relative quiet by this reason. See the effect of a few artillerie strikes on Crimea an sure they could do much more.
1
-
Seen the incremental and too late , less aid, the slow lazy west failed, missed the bus to a possible far better Ukranian result.
The west will go on to be behind the facts, only reacting in stead of initiative. There is not much prove that the west might change.
Too late cluster ammo, atacms, etc. after the offensive, not to believe seriously at all.
For instance o 1.000.000 shells promissed for this year only 300.000 are delivered, now in november.
Still no jets, if they come...of course again too late, and the Russians are yet adapted, still no longrange missiles.... etc etc.
The facts tell that the west isn t in a hurry at all, but goes for the longer grinding down of Russia, nothing new.
For this reason the war will be longer and more expensive.
Putin knows the the spoilt west doesn t have a longer time attention span than a feel good movie. blitzkrieg There will be elections in many countries, that will play the Putin card.
Later the failed west will blame the ukraine for it: we tried, but it didn t work out.
It seems that the big Nato isn t able to do better.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1