Comments by "" (@traveller23e) on "The plan to break apart Google... RIP Chrome" video.

Honestly it would probably be the fairest thing in order to avoid giving any of the other major tech companies a major advantage. GPL that sucker.
143
@theyellowarchitect4504 What was the rest spent on? Other software projects like core libraries and stuff?
32
@MostachoIrregular It really doesn't cost much to run basic HTML static webpages or with a little JS, and ultimately that's basically what I'm looking for from the internet for the most part, so yea maybe I would consider a monthly bill calculated based on sites visited and requests made to each.
11
@lam0bot tbh I don't know much about the linux foundation, care to elaborate?
8
@maxstrong1999 Looks like it, why do you ask? The disadvantage to making Chrome MIT vs GPL is that MIT on a high-demand product that several competing companies are involved in is that it's liable to lead to the problems X had back in the day
2
@kuda1532 Honestly they should standardise app packaging formats so that any packages provided via google play could also be provided at virtually no additional effort on F-droid, Samsung's store, etc
1
I think it should be GPLed and given to some free software group or other but with a yearly development budget paid by google as a slow fine.
1