Comments by "SIMON TAHITI" (@positivepawpaw7564) on "Voice to Parliament support in NSW and Victoria falls below 50 per cent in new poll" video.

  1. 3,278 Aboriginal corporations • 243 Native title bodies • 48 Land councils • 35 Regional councils • 122+ Aboriginal agencies • 3 Advisory bodies • 145 Health Organisations • 11 Indigenous Federal MPs • 12 Culturally important Indigenous days • Taxpayers give $30B annually for 984,000 people (3.8% of the population) • Expenditure per person in 2012-13 was $43,449 on Indigenous Australian compare to $20,900 on other Australians a ratio of 2.08 to 1 and increase from 1.95 in 2009. Australian taxpayers spend at least $100 million a day on direct support for Indigenous Australians every year or $39.5 billion of direct government expenditure every single year. The figures are based on the 2017 Indigenous Expenditure Report produced by the Productivity Commission.
    27
  2.  @Blackjack_Official  not original. maybe 3rd wave of arrivals. bradshaw paintings, and pygmies in far nth queensland missions as recently as 1930s-40s, are proof of this.
    4
  3. The real purpose of this referendum is to change our system of government by injecting a permanent element of racial privilege into the heart of the Constitution. It would give Indigenous Australians – and their descendants for all time – a second method of influencing public policy that goes beyond the benefits of representative democracy that are already enjoyed by all citizens regardless of race.
    3
  4. 'FIRST' NATIONS -> 'FIRST 'MEANS PRIMARY/MAIN INTEREST ETC ,, NOT 1ST ARRIVED. SMOKE N MIRRORS FRIOM ALBOZO 'S CROOKS
    3
  5. @@DSA-queerfaction ''NATIONS'' ? try scattered nomadic tribal groups with no concept of ownership or borders.
    1
  6.  @Blackjack_Official  spat at ? discriminated against ? lol .. bs., one example ? bear in mind that there are $30 billion worth of tax payer funded aboriginal-only services & organisations in existence. when was the last time a white man prevented you from bettering yourself ??
    1
  7.  @Blackjack_Official  the AEC will call it a YES, no matter what. agenda 21 has been under way for about 40 years. albozo has deadlines to keep
    1
  8. broome. you should sit down with albozo & get your lies straight. ''It’s not a radical proposition but a sensible one... A simple, vital and practical principle: that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have a say in the policies and decisions that affect their lives.'' "So let us not content ourselves with modest change. Let us not fill our hearts with the empty warmth of the merely symbolic." "One of the things I'm trying to avoid here – there will be, as occurred at the end of the last century, when a referendum wasn't successful, people looking for all of the detail ... We're not doing that. We're not doing that. We're learning from history. What I am not going to do is to go down the cul-de-sac of getting into every detail because that is not a recipe for success." The Australian Referendum 1967 definitively answered the question: Yes. The Aboriginal people are part of ‘the people living in the states of…’ They are constituted with the people designated by the 1901 as the people with whom the sovereignty rests as stated in the Constitution. And in 1972 a Ministerial office was created specifically for their VOICE in the Parliament.
    1