Comments by "SIMON TAHITI" (@positivepawpaw7564) on "‘Nothing will change on welfare’: Noel Pearson says jobs are ‘healing medicine’ for Indigenous" video.

$30 bn a year to 3% of the population ... follow the money. stop the corruption. get rid of lazy rent seekers. get rid of gravy train freeloaders like pearson, burney & co.
5
Albozo is a dodgy little prikc .. "One of the things I'm trying to avoid here – there will be, as occurred at the end of the last century, when a referendum wasn't successful, people looking for all of the detail .... We're not doing that. We're not doing that. We're learning from history. What I am not going to do is to go down the cul-de-sac of getting into every detail because that is not a recipe for success."
1
@ApexAL Patrick Moore, one of the founders of Greenpeace, said his reasons for leaving Greenpeace were very clear: “Greenpeace was ‘hijacked’ by the political left when they realized there was money and power in the environmental movement. [Left-leaning] political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organization to a political fundraising organization,” Moore said. Moore left Greenpeace in 1986, 15 years after he co-founded the organization. “The ‘environmental’ movement has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement,” he said. “They are primarily focused on creating narratives, stories, that are designed to instill fear and guilt into the public so the public will send them money.” He said they mainly operate behind closed doors with other political operatives at the U.N., World Economic Forum, and so on, all of which are primarily political in nature. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] is “not a science organization,” he said. “It is a political organization composed of the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program. “The IPCC hires scientists to provide them with ‘information’ that supports the ‘climate emergency’ narrative.
1
@ApexAL <- this sucker will sign without reading the fine print first. "One of the things I'm trying to avoid here – there will be, as occurred at the end of the last century, when a referendum wasn't successful, people looking for all of the detail ... We're not doing that. We're not doing that. We're learning from history. What I am not going to do is to go down the cul-de-sac of getting into every detail because that is not a recipe for success."
1