Comments by "SuperStella1111" (@SuperStella1111) on "Harry And Meghan “Firing Off Legal Letters” To BBC Over Name ‘Lilibet’ Made Queen “UPSET”" video.

  1. He just admitted she did. He’s the author. He’s backtracking on his own story. In the video.
    3
  2. Nope. THEY have been abused.
    2
  3. “It wasn’t about the name! It was what came after!” Oh dear. They’re backtracking already.
    2
  4. Grow up you racist cow. Harry adored his granny. His book is full of adoration for her. Lying racist bitch.
    1
  5.  @CCc-b6r  well said, you agree? You fucking loser. They haven’t done anything you braindead racist cow. This man invented a story - he literally back peddles it in this video - and the press is using it to knock Andrew off the front page. You loser. Fucking bird brains.
    1
  6. Of course she met the child. Loser. They haven’t done anything you braindead racist cow. This man invented a story - he literally back peddles it in this video - and the press is using it to knock Andrew off the front page. You loser. Fucking bird brains.
    1
  7.  @Bronte866  you stupid racist Birther cow.
    1
  8. He can’t back it. He put it in the book thinking it wasn’t important. It’s exploded now - because they need ANYTHING to get Andrew off the front page. If the Queen really did wail about being a billionaire owning nothing, then she was an entitled rich bitch.
    1
  9.  @buddy6743  confirmed by Lady C
    1
  10.  @ortensiamarra7838  the children live in California. The law says: no pictures of minors can be published. Hence the side shots. There are hundreds of Lilibet pictures online. Ordinary people who stop the Sussexes for autographs CAN post the pictures.
    1
  11. The name Lilibet has not been copyrighted - I checked the public database. So that’s a lie. And the author just admitted she knew perfectly well and agreed. So it’s a nothing story.
    1
  12.  @Bronte866  They haven’t done anything you braindead racist cow. This man invented a story - he literally back peddles it in this video - and the press is using it to knock Andrew off the front page. You loser. Fucking bird brains.
    1
  13. You just heard the author backtracking the claim.
    1
  14.  @Gartenpalme1  he has to backtrack on the story. He can’t back it. It was a lie he invented for the book.
    1
  15.  @catiejoanna  he has to backtrack. The story isn’t true.
    1
  16. He didn’t. This author invented a story making her look like a petty rich bitch and a racist (“I’m a billionaire! I own NOTHING! *sob*”) Harry didn’t make her sound like that. He made her sound like a loving granny. Refocus your anger. You seem confused.
    1
  17. A granny loved her grandchild? Yeah. That sounds weird. You stupid racist braindead cow.
    1
  18. Wow. The casual racism is incredible from you. What a freak you are.
    1
  19. They haven’t done anything you braindead racist cow. This man invented a story - he literally back peddles it in this video - and the press is using it to knock Andrew off the front page. You loser. Fucking bird brains.
    1
  20.  @linwei-lee110  it was a badly sourced, throwaway story. Unimportant and only in the news to drum up anti-Harry outrage to - again! - distract from the Epstein revelations. And he now realizes the story was a mistake.
    1
  21. Of course she met her. 2021.
    1
  22. They haven’t done anything you braindead racist cow. This man invented a story - he literally back peddles it in this video - and the press is using it to knock Andrew off the front page. You loser. Fucking bird brains.
    1
  23. Harry is the least scandalous member of his family. He’s just the one tabloids pick on because they’re racist.
    1
  24. They haven’t done anything you braindead racist cow. This man invented a story - he literally back peddles it in this video - and the press is using it to knock Andrew off the front page. You loser. Fucking bird brains.
    1