Comments by "Luke Sandy High Ground" (@Luke_Sandy_High_Ground) on "HistoryLegends" channel.

  1. Who remembers the “Kherson counter offensive falls flat” video
    19
  2. Bahkmut still holding
    15
  3. Has Bahkmut fallen yet?
    11
  4. How is this battle still going?
    11
  5. Any day now...
    9
  6. Tomorrow for sure
    9
  7. “Bahkmut is about to fall” Posted November 2022
    8
  8. In 31 days Bahkmut will surpass Verdun as the longest battle in history.
    8
  9. “Bahkmut is about to fall” Posted November 2022
    6
  10. I thought you said Bahkmut was about to fall in November
    5
  11. Bros, this battle is nearly as long as Verdun. Insane
    4
  12.  @fikarrusdiawan9562  capturing the capital city of an entire oblast and routing the Russian army back across the dnieper river is definitely a strategic victory, keep coping.
    3
  13.  @fikarrusdiawan9562  what power? Battle of Bahkmut has gone on for 8 months now with Russia losing 5 times more soldiers than Ukraine. Ukraine has also received Leopard 2s, Abrams and challenger 2 tanks
    3
  14.  @hyhhy  no he posted a vid "Bahkmut is about to fall" on 30th November.
    3
  15. least obvious russian propaganda
    2
  16.  @fikarrusdiawan9562  no he wasnt lmao. They retook the city
    2
  17.  @paulzoom489  what about “Kherson counter offensive falls flat”
    2
  18. Like Trafalgar and the Nile? Oh wait Britain was clever and always played to its strengths for the entire war and its main fighting force was the Royal Navy. Why throw away lives fighting on land when you can use the navy to blockade them, bleed their economy, and fund all their enemies. They weren't going to jeopardise their OP position in the world by 'playing fair' against the French.
    2
  19.  @my_father_sorry_i_am_lying_now  maybe you should learn history not Godi propaganda
    1
  20.  @my_father_sorry_i_am_lying_now  if you say "dont cry" you have automatically lost the argument, and since you cant even provide a source I win by that alone.
    1
  21. source: I made it up
    1
  22.  @northman7946  one challenger 2 can destroy 100 soviet tanks
    1
  23.  @drjacob2276  source
    1
  24. Britain was clever and always played to its strengths for the entire war and its main fighting force was the Royal Navy. Why throw away lives fighting on land when you can use the navy to blockade them, bleed their economy, and fund all their enemies. They weren't going to jeopardise their OP position in the world by 'playing fair' against the French
    1
  25. I'm enjoying watching all the French cope by trying to spin this battle as a British loss. They never recovered from Trafalgar
    1
  26. for example? @MarieFirst 
    1
  27. If it wasn't for Britain propping up their economies and the Royal Navy destroying French global trade then nobody would have won.
    1
  28.  @abhinavvajpai1711  About time. 9 months and 100,000 casualties to seize the 57th largest town in Ukraine
    1
  29. The British army had 700,000 soldiers in 1914, reaching a peak strength of 3.8 million by 1918
    1
  30.  @JackBaptist  The British army had 700,000 soldiers in 1914. Look it up
    1
  31.  @JackBaptist  “the start of ww1, the British army had 80,000 professional soldiers”
    1
  32.  @JackBaptist  it had 250,000 regulars
    1