Comments by "FiveLiver" (@FiveLiver) on "David Starkey Talks" channel.

Hilarious!
1
They work in concert.
1
David starkey says the Suffragettes weren't terrorists. Simon Webb come in here.
1
Tory voters like me have moved to pastures new. I would like the Conservative party to get out of the way and let those better suited to representing the British people take power.
1
@lydiamalone1859 Not so much 'magic' but agreed upon. As it takes centuries to establish such a thing, once gone it cannot be recreated. The value of the monarchy is that it exists outside of politics, like an umpire who doesn't take part.
1
The left don't debate - they lock people up.
1
All that is fine as long as we stop importing the Third World into the Anglo-sphere (an issue you don't mention)
1
Your country created a new religion, antiwhiteism - the moral satisfaction at the white erasure of the West.
1
15:32 Though I agree with him generally, I think David will have to find a better refutation of Rousseau than this quote from St Augustine.
1
They use it nonetheless
1
Can you do anything other than name call?
1
Starkey's atheism demonstrates he's not a clever as he thinks he is.
1
@KnellofPartingDay It shows he's quite dim, and believes he is responsible to no greater power.
1
@robinsoncrusoejr7089 Unfortunately, if you watch enough of Starkey's material you hear the same things umpteen times. Add to that, 'what is democracy children?' seminar type questions and it all becomes rather tortuos. If he had something brilliant to say please tell me. It's important to get to the point IMMEDIATELY. Then back up what you are saying. I'm not a millennial or gen Z, I'm one of the highly revered boomer generation.
1
@livelovelaugh2130 Hitchens is a contrarian and a doomer. Murray is coming into his own now.
1
@tdevry Not a tall silly. Before then he was more of a passive and somewhat detached observer. After that he sounded like he was in the fight.
1
@aranisles8292 Books are great for establishing credentials and thought leading, but they are not a mass consumption media. The media is the battleground: speeches, debates, interviews. In interviews Scruton came over as meek. The left are in ascendent everywhere, they are winning in culture and in politics. Scruton failed. Who have moved populations in recent years? Donald Trump and Nigel Farage. Public opinion is shifted by outspoken and fearless people who don't back down.
1
@Barrettszippo You may not like it, but Scruton failed, the left keep winning. It started way before Stasi Starmer.
1
@morqthana quote some of Scruton's anti-semitic bigotry for us will you?
1
@morqthana Why Scruton what?
1
Then you are part of the problem
1
Trump an 'awful candidate'?
1
👁
1
@wolfiestreet6899 The official narrative is that Islam is a religion of peace - I said otherwise.
1
@costakeith9048 Islm imposed itself on societies that were once Christian, Zoroastrian or Buddhist. You speak of the 'flaw' in liberalism, but liberal Britain created the largest empire in history, and led the world into modernity. The millions from the backward Third Wold are trying to get into the liberal countries of the West because they don't like the values, and hence the living conditions imposed on them by Islm, an ideology that is anti-individual and anti-creative. People are voting with their feet. We should assist them where they are by acting against this 14 centuries old problem which would shackle the world given the chance.
1
@costakeith9048 I'm talking about giving people the right to choose, and that includes choosing Christianity. It wasn't feudal Britain that built the Empire it was the Enlightenment values of freedom to trade and stake your own claim in the New World. The Empire was not 'lost' - the USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia still exist as expressions of the British race and values and are the living legacy of Empire. The rest India and Africa were developed from trade and and the desire to explore and was not intended to be permanent like the Roman Empire. The Empire was a net drain on the exchequer, and we are better without it. What exactly was 'disastrous' about the reforms of the 1830s and 1911? Your attack on liberalism doesn't acknowledge that our society is liberal in nature, and springs from our Christianity, to deny that is to throw the baby out with the bathwater. What we have today is not liberal, it is the opposite. It is the authoritarian excesses of leftism and conformist collectivism that have damaged this country.
1
@costakeith9048 Enforcing Christianity is contradictory to the spirit of Christianity, while enforcing Islam is essential to it - giving everyone no right of choice creates the cultural and creative Islamic backwaters that Trump had a term for, ending in ‘holes’. Enforced Christianity cannot possibly work as post Reformation there is no agreed form of Christianity. Charles I and Cromwell had opposing beliefs, which led to civil war. The divine right of kings? Good luck bringing that back. It is absurd to believe that the continuation of the British Empire was an option into the 21st Century. As if the countries in Africa, India and the far east would have happily gone along with it? This is pure fantasy. The end result of democracy is tyranny? Obviously not, democracy is the antidote to tyranny. What we have now it not democracy, it is a corruption of it; the will of the people is ignored again and again. All the “It’s democracy, it’s liberalism” is just nonsense and has to stop. It’s woke leftism and globalist technocracy, dressed up as liberal democracy that is imposing ‘equality’ over us.
1
@costakeith9048 It's time to remind you that my comment was about Islam, not the sects of Christianity, not democracy, not Russia and the Tzars. We in civilised Britain (God knows where you are from) either regain real democracy and the rule of law, or continue with the current pretend democracy into digital globalist despotism, which is turning a blind eye to the problems caused by the religion of peace.
1
@costakeith9048 The purpose of Islam is dual: to convert the world yes, but more importantly subdue it under Sharia - this is how Islam spread historically, by the oppression of dhimmitude. To imagine it is not a threat is exactly what they want you to believe. You have already had a Muslim in the White House, ("the future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam") and had Hillary Clinton won in 2016 her Chief of Staff was a daughter of the Muslim Brotherhood. References to Islam have already been removed from FBI training manuals. While martial law would be a good thing to halt the criminality and corruption, of the current establishment, it would only be to reintroduce REAL democracy, it cannot exist indefinitely as, like all things, a dictatorship will devolve into corruption.
1
@costakeith9048 Let's also not forget that Britain and France occupied Constantinople after defeating the Ottomans, and it was there for Russia's asking had not that country been subverted by Bolshevism with a desire not to cooperate with capitalists. What an opportunity missed. Just to point out that while Islam conquered the Byzantine provinces of Egypt, Syria and Palestine, the schism with Rome happened long afterwards, so it would be wrong to arrogate those places to the Orthodox church at that time.
1
9:22 "..to protect a text which for the whole of the Christian middle ages was regarded as the work of the Devil" Fat chance the Pope or the Archbishop of Canterbury saying that today.
1
@shabbos-goy9407 CRT comes out of Antiwhiteism, not the other way round.
1
Stasi Starmer
1
Not is he declares martial law and makes himself dictator.
1
Islam was the original organised crime.
1
Antiwhiteism has many origins.
1
Comrade Starmer King of the anti-white woke.
1
7:40 No one is descended from the prophet Mohammad - there is no historical evidence that he even existed. You might as well say descended from King Arthur.
1
What a great justification for white erasure!
1
@sbor2020 The Tories are as woke and antiwhite as Labour - they have to go.
1
They have conserved the achievements of Blair.
1