Comments by "cloudpoint" (@cloudpoint0) on "Ukraine: ATACMS long-range missiles from the US have arrived | DW News" video.

Imagine the shame of begging weapons from North Korea to fight a war with a country you expected to defeat in three days.
5
@RecklessAbandonZ NATO is defeating Russia, and without sending soldiers.
4
@RecklessAbandonZ Ukraine didn't ask for troops, just weapons and troop training. Ukraine already has more troops than Russia inside Ukraine (700K vs 400K). Ukraine just reported that another batch of 30,000 Ukrainian soldiers completed their NATO training in the UK this week. ______________ Edit: This was in reply to the following that has disappeared... @cloudpoint0 Okay I see🤣😂 So NATO is defeating Russia without sending troops and who's dying on the side of NATO? Oh the Ukrainians. Poor sods.
4
@ashutoshsingh8300 It's not wrong, it's just a shameful state for a former superpower to be in, to be asking for weapons from one of the poorest countries in the world. I don't think Russia had plans to conduct its SMO equally in the beginning. It expected to walk in and destroy Ukraine in a few weeks and then move on to the next nation in Putin’s conquest list.
1
@Gerrard_Pike2008 Russia did not buy any weapons. Russia is broke and broken. Russia promised some future Russian junk in exchange for outdated artillery ammo from North Korea now. Likely Russia will never pay up since it won’t exist. It still hasn’t paid its Russian Empire debts after 106 years ago. Nothing has changed. Russia defaulted on its foreign debt payment in June a year ago. Ukraine did not beg for any weapons. Ukraine generously offered to fight the Russian menace for NATO, and NATO said "Great. Can we help you with some weapons? Just tell us what you need." Gifts are not begging.
1