Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "Testing Joe Rogan‘s JFK Bullet Theory" video.

  1.  @danmaltby3271 the head shot didn’t come from the depository
    4
  2.  @adamb89 making those shots that he made isn’t easy. Test it with the same rifle, the same .224 ammo and the same shooting a moving target through foliage. Getting increasing accuracy on each shot while tracking on all 3 axis ain’t easy. He was ax marksman, I say you gotta be an expert to make that shot, especially with that rifle
    3
  3. The magic bullet wasn’t the one that got his head but never mind
    1
  4.  @gradyjones7017  why would they hide and destroy evidence and intimidate witnesses afterwards? Because they were told to. Weeks before he was assassinated a lot of older experienced secret service members were replaced with new young guys.
    1
  5.  @KickassUncle  speaking as a practising criminal defense attorney, when scrutinising the investigative procedures and legal proceedings of the JFK assassination case you find many inconsistencies that would simply not hold up in a court of law. For a start, the lack of thorough questioning and complete absence of verification regarding the identity of CE399, the "magic bullet," raises concerns about the missing chain of custody. Key witnesses such as Darrell Tomlinson, the medical technologist who found the ‘magic’ bullet, and special agents Johnson, Todd and Rowley, whom Tomlinson passed the bullet to, were not directly asked to confirm the bullet's authenticity, a crucial step in establishing the veracity of evidence. In fact, they are all on record as saying CE399 was NOT the bullet that was found on a stretcher in Parkland hospital. This omission hinders the legal process's ability to establish a clear connection between the bullet and the events. Oversights such as these, SCD there are many more, undermine the integrity of the investigation and its ability to arrive at a comprehensive and accurate conclusion.
    1
  6.  @jackflannigan5749 interestingly the the complaints about the lack of accuracy from Carcano’s partially stem from the general use in the USA of smaller diameter ammo i.e. .224 as opposed to .226 used by the Italians. The .224 does not fully engage the rifling, leading to a loss of stability and accuracy. As far as I know, (allegedly) LHO was shooting .224. So it would be interesting if he could replicate ac moving target in all 3 axis through foliage at the downward angle at the correct distance with the same ammo. A lot of yee haws on the internet say they’re 3 easy shots. Now, my experience with the Carcano is limited, and I haven't had my hands on the LHO example, but if I were inclined to go assisinating a president, which I am not, I would use my dad's Remington, but the Springfield would be adequate as would my Gustav. If the spring on my trunk lid of my car broke, I’d use the Carcano to prop up the trunk lid, and that's about what I think of them.
    1