Comments by "The Esseboy" (@TheEsseboy) on "On the Frontlines of the Abortion War: Death Threats and Arsons" video.

Yes, blood on GOPs hands, women are suffering, forced to be baby factories, suffering life changing harm, forced to take care of babies they never wanted.
3
@annjames1837 No, they are old and tired of being harassed for helping women get healthcare.
3
They are, they want to force women to be baby making machines, with less rights than a fetus.
2
@darklord7069 My mother chose to have me, for that I thank her, she had all the right to abort me, I wouldn't have had the right to forcefully ocupy her body. Condoms, pills, spirals, etc. They are never 100% secure, and people do mistakes...we shouldn't punish them by forcing them to have a fetus growing inside of them and have their bellies expand by 3-4 gallons just because of that, then have their genitals risk damage, not to mention the chance of death to the mother. You just don't see women as humans...
2
@lavenderlavenderlavender5680 You probably still think that Trump won 2020.
2
@Pomni740 They are, because they are forced to keep a fetus inside of them even when it can be safely removed, you cannot force someone to have another human or any other thing inside of them against their will...this is basic healthcare.
2
@lavenderlavenderlavender5680 You are copy pasting I see.
1
@lavenderlavenderlavender5680 Are you okay?
1
Nope, a fetus is not a human yet, it cannot survive without being attached to another human, which you cannot morally force someone to do unwillingly.
1
@travisjohnson7065 So you also count sperm and eggs as humans then? They also have human DNA. Explain to me how you can force a mother to host a fetus inside of her and make her belly swell by a cubic foot and risk damaging her body and have her also suffer emotionally and economically.
1
@CodyBarton-vp8do If they are living inside of your body and removing them means that they die, then yes. No one can claim your body as a place to live.
1
@Daniel-oj5jf No, it is a fetus, and there is no proof god excists so your soul and heaven theory is very shaky. The fetus doesn't have the right to demand a womens body...
1
@travisjohnson7065 The force being stopping her from visiting a doctor to have an abortion and imprisoning her. That is forcing her to be a fetus incubator. You are not listening are you?
1
@travisjohnson7065 Well, poor people kinda are in many parts of the world cause the rich hoard all the wealth, then blame poor people for stealing of them to get food on the table. You see how it is intrincly linked together? If you force a woman to not get an abortion, you are indirectly forcing them to be baby incubators, as you value the fetuses rights more than the womans rights. I do not understand how this is so hard for you to understand. You cannot kill something that is not yet a developed organism, that is like saying you killed babies by not fertilizing the eggs and sperm you wasted, they could all be human individuals.
1
@travisjohnson7065 So the woman has the right to the fetuses body then? Then it cancells out, and the woman still has the right to not consent to the development of a fetus inside of he and evict it. It's not the womans problem that the fetus cannot sustain itself outside of the womb...doen't give it the right to be in hers. You still refuse to see how this is giving the fetus more rights than the woman... Do you have children? Do you know what it's like to be pregnant? It is not a dance on roses like you seem to put it when you gloss over it like it's nothing. You are not defending the fetus, you are forcing women to keep fetuses inside of them when they do not consent. Which is making them into rightless baby factories. And women will find ways, illegal or not to do abortions, the numbers won't drop, only the health of women will drop, as will their mental health and social security. Like before Roe vs wade.
1
@travisjohnson7065 The 1 yearold argument doesn't work as you can get other people to help with that, and the child is not living inside of your body. The fetus is still not a developed human, and the mother does suffer way graver consequences going through a pregnancy than just caring for a child that is already born...if you don't believe me you should really do your research on what it is like to go through a pregnancy. You are clearly delusional and do not subscribe to logic, parhaps you need to do more research to understand why your religion is based on circular arguments and other invalid logics for you to understand why. You are clearly emotionally attached to fetuses, and value their well being more than womens. Women are not baby incubators.
1
@travisjohnson7065 So then it would be perfectly valid to force a person to give a kidney or have a fetus implanted into them from a dying mother?
1
@travisjohnson7065 How will you stop a women from having an abortion? By attacking them or just using the magic? If the right to live as you said is higher than bodily autonomy, then we should able to force people to donate kidneys, pieces of their liver etc. to make other people live. And if a mother is severly ill a fetus could be forcefully inserted into another women to make her be pregnant with it. You still make no sense, just like your blind religion. All religions are based on lies and faulty logical arguments that are clad in clothes of "common sense", when it in reality is delusion.
1
@travisjohnson7065 The fetus is dying of natural causes though, as it naturally cannot live outside of human. And naturally a woman who doesn't consent to a pregnancy will have it removed or in early cases flushed out with the induced period. The argument still holds, in that case shouldn't we stop all healthcare? And forbid all unnatural remedies? If "natural" (whatever that is) is the only metric on what whe should do. You are grasping at straws... Does a woman have the right to choose what to do with her body or not? What's next? Will you advocate for stopping heart surgeries because there is nothing in the bible about it?
1
@travisjohnson7065 So the Fetus then owns the mothers body?
1
@travisjohnson7065 Does the fetus have more autonomy over the Womans body, which it needs to be able to demand a space inside of her.
1
@travisjohnson7065 The fetus still apears when the woman didn't cosent, so it does demand a space inside of her body. Hence it has bodily autonomy over the woman by your logic, which would mean they could demand another womans body if the woman they reside in dies.
1
@travisjohnson7065 No, it's more like when you put the seeds in sand and protect them from sunlight and them still sprouting, then a total stranger comes along and tells you that you cannot remove the carrots! Well, if someone wanted to be put inside of you to survive, they would need your consent, so human life does sometimes require consent if it conflicts with another persons bodily autonomy.
1
@travisjohnson7065 Still doesn't give the fetus bodily autonomy over the woman. It's the womans body, it is her choice! You are basically advocating for forcing women trough fines, jail time and harassment to not be able to choose weather she goes through a pregnancy or not. That is forcefull, and not at all a passive stance. If bodily the importance of life thrumps bodily autonomy of the woman, then we should all be making as many children as possible? That makes no sense at all...and you know it, you just ignore it and don't value logical thinking, you merely value traditions and upholding the past.
1
@travisjohnson7065 A fetus is not yet a human being, it is just like a sperm or eggcell just potentiality a human life. So why does a fetus have the right to demand a woman to be forced to carry it?
1
@travisjohnson7065 So because it is natural, the fetus can demand it? Then we should demand all smokers and alcoholics to not get treatment and die naturally no? Treating them is unnatural and bad...do you not see how you have one messuring stick for fetuses, and another for everyone else? Find one biologist that claims a fetus is the same as a full term born baby....or even a pre term one who would survive outside of the wombbwith medical assistance...what is next? Next you will claim egg cells have the same right to be fertilized to live, and naturally any man can naturally ejaculate into her, and she should just accept it. You are a hypocrite.
1
You cannot murder a fetus, as it is not yet a self sustaining life form. Just like you don't kill sperm or egg cells.
1
@travisjohnson7065 No, it's not the fetuses right to be attached to another inside of them...just like one couldn't force you to have another human inside of you if it meant they would survive...
1
@travisjohnson7065 The woman can be raped, the woman could have suffered a faulty condom, pills are not 100% either, and mistakes happen. Doesn't mean she can be forced to be a incubator because of it. Then maybe you should look over all the laws that allow people to shoot trespassers without any form of checks and balances, socity allowing homlessness to be a constant problem, children in orphanages suffer etc. Fetuses are not even developed, they have no formative thoughts, they are like sperms and eggs just precursors...that doesn't make them have a right to a womans body to be incubated until becoming a baby.
1
Nope, wealth and income equality fixes terrorism, also human rights like the right to health care, which abortion is.
1
@lavenderlavenderlavender5680 You are copy pasting I see.
1
Which is true for the woman aswell, so the fetus cannot live inside of her if she doesn't consent.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 We cannot force the woman to have a fetus grow inside of her, just like you cannot force a man to give his kidney to a critically ill person.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 First off, condoms, pills, spirals, etc. are not 100% effective, sometimes it happens, and if it happens in a turbulent time people might not catch that they got pregnant before the first missing period. Second of all there is a start of a human, a full human doesn't appear at conseption... Well, the fetus didn't ask for consent, and just like with anything else with the body, if the woman doesn't want it, she has the full right to stop it from growing. And besides, banning abortion only leeds to black market abortions, and a few very very bad situations where the parents do not even want the kid. Which could have been prevented.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 Is your daughter living inside of your stomach? Ofc you cannot kill her as she can live outside of another human. Fetus is the precurser to babies, they do not have the right to a womans body...they cannot force a woman to carry them to term.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 So if I couldn't live outside of your stomach, you would let me move in? You make no sense, it is not killing when the fetus is removed, it is ending a pregnancy...killing would mean the fetus was a self sustaining life form. It's not a baby until the fetus can live outside the womb...so it is not killing it, the fetus just cannot live on it's own. It is just not welcome in the host anymore.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 Ehm, if so if I crawled inside of you and made it so that I would die if I where removed, you would accept carrying me around? A preson has full autonomy of their body and what goes inside of it and what is grown inside of them. It is their freedom to remove a fetus if it is not wanted. Period. In the USA you can shoot a person if they tresspass on sight, without reprocaustions, so why would it be any different if a fetus trespasses in a womans womb? It was not invited, it was not given persmission... Admit it, you see woman as less humans, so they should be forced to be baby incubators...that is the real agenda her, and women will not accept that, black market abortions will be rampant, and the abortion numbers will be the same, just not out in the open like it is now.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 You are again equating having a child inside of your body, and outside...taking care of a child is not the same as being pregnant, and if you think it is you are very ignorant... You just refuse to understand what a pregnancy is and what it's like to be pregnant. You just don't care what happens to women as long as they are good baby factories. No, I want women to be able to choose if they want abortions, which is not the same as killing newborn and older children...you are confusing things and are spreading missinformation. A fetus is not a child yet...and it doesn't have more rights than the mother to her body! Otherwise we should be able to take kidneys off of people by force, same for blood and other harvestable organs. Because people need to live by your logic, that is the only things that matter to you, them being good human facotries.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 So if a person is in need, then we can hook you up to a sick patient? Because by your logic you shouldn't have an issue with that, not even if we put the person inside of you.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 Why not transplant the fetus into the Man who made her pregnant then? When the tech is ready, would you do it if the mother was sick? No, the fetus still do not have the right to occupy a womans body, it is her body, not yours, not the fetuses...you cannot force her to be a baby incubator. End of story. I do not have to prove the fetus is none human, I just have to prove that it doesn't have the right to a womans body. It doesn't matter whos fault it is, if the woman wants it out, they are free to consult their doctor and have it removed.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 No, the Fetus have no right to be inside of the womb if the woman doesn't consent. Plain and simple, and you cannot kill something that isn't developed yet, that is like saying you killed a tree when you removed a seed from your lawn.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 The women is not responsible for the fetus being there, that is the reproductive organs doing their thing, it is a human trait to have sex...with that attitude we shouldn't give smokers and alcoholics health care. Heartbeat is just a heartbeat, even a spider has a heart. It still doesn't have a developed human brain or organs to support itself, or with others caring for it. And the woman is simply removing it from her uterus. Stop being so ignorant, you are just trying to force women to be obedient baby making machines that people can knock up and force to carry the child. That is evil and cruel.
1
@ex-muslimtestimonies001 That is between the one with the uterus and their doctor.
1
@travisjohnson7065 You do not get rich by having abortions, you just survive...the argument is still valid. Nope, a fetus is not a human yet, it cannot survive without being attached to another human, which you cannot morally force someone to do unwillingly. So there is no right violation, you cannot have a right to be attached to another human, or take their organs, blood etc.
1
Nope, only 25% of people have an abortion before 45, so maybe 20% before 30...faar from 20 per woman.
1
@travisjohnson7065 How is it killing someone when the thing you are removing from inside of a human cannot even survive on it's own? It is like calling it murder to kick out a person living in your room because they couldn't survie on their own.
1
@travisjohnson7065 Not always, but the fetus doesn't have autonomy over the mothers body, so they have all the right to remove them. I mean, you can shoot a man blindly in 'murica if you feel they trespass and are endangering you, so why can't a woman abort a fetus? No, a one year-old can be nurtured by others, apples and oranges. Would you accept a fetus to be implemented into you when the medical technology is there to do that? If a mother dies, would you have the fetus implanted into you? By force mind you ...that would by your logic be totally okay, you shouldn't have been close to a dying mother, duuh. No, an abortion is merely the ending of the Womans pregnancy, wether the fetus lives or dies is beyond the abortion process.
1