Comments by "Ash Roskell" (@ashroskell) on "Russia has Received Iranian Missiles to Attack Ukraine" video.

Thank you, Jake.
12
@patriot1234100 : War is politics, son. Read your Von Clausewitz. Honestly, you would be ashamed to put your real name next to such a comment.
11
@ajmaynard92 : Russian bots are getting . . . 🥱 . . . 😴 . . . long winded.
9
@ajmaynard92 : You said Jake’s analysis sounded, “off,” to you, and you outline Pool’s argument in detail. To be honest, I lost interest after those initial errors (at best). It is a staple of Russian disinformation to muddy waters, deliberately over complicate issues, in the hope that people will throw up their hands not knowing what to think. But, if you are not shilling for Russia, perhaps you can make that unambiguously clear? Then you will receive my whole hearted apology, if I am convinced.
8
@Mehwhatevr : Oh, you can be sure that the other New York is on Putin’s list. Just not yet . . .
6
@ajmaynard92 : My last response to you got zapped by the YouTube algorithm monster. I cannot even guess as to why? “Unambiguously,” though. You are arguing for the enemy of democracy and freedom. That is morally and factually wrong.
3
@Ikkeligeglad : Everyone.
2
@skullsparkjoker9942 : Prison? . . . Surely, by now? . . . What else would make her go so quiet during campaign season?
2
@ajmaynard92 : Unambiguously, you are defending a traitor. We will let the courts decide which arguments hold water. But it’s worth remembering the DOJ’s unofficial rule, here. See, traditionally, they don’t prosecute people just for being guilty, nor on the basis of evidence alone. The DOJ only prosecutes people they are confident they can get CONVICTED. And there are a lot of Russian shell companies that are about to go out of business as the DOJ works through its list of 60+ suspects. You have nothing to say about the war, here. Nothing about Putin. Nothing about Zelensky. Wonder why?
1
@ajmaynard92 : Frankly, I have no idea how you could convince me either. Probably not worth trying, eh?
1