Comments by "Geoffrey Lyons" (@granatmof) on "Why Poland Switched to this Infantry Fighting Vehicle" video.

  1. In terms of design, all armor is a series of compromises. The exact comprises are dependent on competing technologies and tactics. With advancements in shoulder mounted AT weapons, there's no way a platform can be robust enough to forever be resistant to future weapons, however having enough robust armor for all light arms up to 20-30mm cannons. The defense for AT should rely on active protection systems which can be upgraded. Also I think amphibious options are great. It never hurts to have options. In playing wargame, it's useful to be able to use amphibious vehicles to cross a river and seize the other side of a bridge to make it easier to send a heavy column across without getting bunched up
    3
  2. New editing style goal: be like Where's Waldo in every piece of footage you use.
    1