Comments by "Grave Peril" (@graveperil2169) on "Al Jazeera English" channel.

  1. Sending a relief force to Khartoum would be "a war of conquest against a people struggling to be free. Yes, these are people struggling to be free and rightly struggling to be free"
    1
  2. which are feed by fast fashion its not an answer its just the scraps that have fallen off the table
    1
  3.  @kayjr9795  well its not the UK
    1
  4. The UK has very busy air space and most large drones are not civilian flight legal, the Isle of Wight is not a remote island is just off the the south coast is the 40 min ferry time that they are reducing
    1
  5. win for Ukraine that cost Ruissa more live to take than it did Ukraine to hold
    1
  6. Its along way from the Soviet union of old, in fact its the Old Soviet country's that are blocking the talks they know what its like dealing with Russia and want no part of it
    1
  7. fool, people will just shrug and carry on a wasted death
    1
  8. the UK government does not do God
    1
  9.  @prp3231  thats London and these days its mainly chewing gum
    1
  10. your employer is broke and in debit
    1
  11. British-Egyptian dual national in trouble with Egypt, Standard British policy is You are on your own they have as much claim on you as the British and you are in their land
    1
  12. how long is COP27 as he will be dead in 3 days unless he is cheating
    1
  13. its against there rights to force feed them
    1
  14. illegal cross the channel and go to Rwanda, the worse Rwanda is the better it will stop more crossing
    1
  15. good
    1
  16. Egypt would prefer for them to die in Gaza than to enter Egypt
    1
  17. guilty of holding Israel back for too long
    1
  18. we are still buying cheap iPhone's from China right?
    1
  19.  @wangsamaju5007  it cost alot of money and it sole value was bragging rights so after the first trip there was no reason to go back and although they got to the moon it was on the edge of what technology could do at the time so it was only a matter of time till people died, so lots of downsides and once it was done no up side
    1
  20. no reason to
    1
  21. sure they can and the US can trade with who they like so if they want to cut off SA for dealing with the Russians we all agree thats their option
    1
  22. @Woodon was you expecting wisdom from youtube?
    1
  23. @Woodon its your choice i think you have chosen poorly but it up to you, you should always chose carefully who you trade with as it is both a blessing and a curse
    1
  24.  @alls8990  SA supports Russia countries that support SA are supporting Russia, the US has said this from the start of the war so its not a surprise SA knew the risks and did it anyway
    1
  25.  @alls8990  who is judging just not going to trade with you
    1
  26.  @LiberalhumanToilet  its called diplomacy nations use their power to influence others
    1
  27.  @jpjoseph578  international law only applies if you have signed up to it
    1
  28. you know both sides are Arabs right?
    1
  29. "international law" only exists for humans
    1
  30. feeling inadeque again?
    1
  31. its true of most health services they moved away from sterilisation and reuse of equipment to single use plastics I guess its safer for the patients just bad for the planet
    1
  32.  @georgedoherty962  its what Scotland did
    1
  33. why Russians are dying its going well
    1
  34.  @stefaniabrazzi1358  so long as Russians die we are happy they should not have used chemical weapons on UK soil
    1
  35. 20 years ago it was figure heads with big ideas now its middle management trying the get the existing system to work, well as the big ideas failed maybe it is time to live with the hand you have been dealt
    1
  36. to the west?
    1
  37. its not like law school is a thing will we be voting for doctors next?
    1
  38.  @dan27032  it crosses the river that's north south
    1
  39.  @Grace-bk4tq  and you are an insane god bother, Now we have traded insults are you happy?
    1
  40. FOC Arm twisting and turning a blind eye is normal when it comes to countries
    1
  41.  @jarosawbielski2301  can we leave the sky faeries out of this one
    1
  42.  @yannaingtun3675  so what was the big reason?
    1
  43.  @happymelon7129  seams fair as the battle lines have hardly moved since that last Ukraine offensive and the pubic have memories of the goldfish, But why dose this turn into support for Russia?
    1
  44. why? never understood the American right on this care to explain?
    1
  45.  @BLUEWAVE2024-k4f  no but they are the only one fighting a war at the moment
    1
  46.  @dennis3351  you may have more justification to say that about China but the US nolonger cares about Russia they are not a threat
    1
  47.  @igor_pavlovich  people careless with matches
    1
  48.  @christianviews4097  so Ukraine i not allowed to join the deference group it chooses and for a country with nukes how is it a "serious provocation" an embarrassment sure but hardly cause for a war that ha driven Sweden and Finland to also join NATO, As to divided countries great powers/UN imposing peace treaties rarely end well best to let one side kill the other then there can be peace
    1
  49.  @kirabowilliam  the planned NATO invasion of Russia in 2022?
    1
  50.  @vaheeda.mohdrasheed8767  because the world felt guilty after WW2
    1