Comments by "TimeMasterXX222" (@TimeMasterOG) on "Who Sank The Titanic? - The Secrets Behind the History | Free Documentary History" video.

  1. Where you getting 30mph from??? Titanic maxed out on 21 knots which is 24mph
    4
  2. It was a ship builders magazine that stated it - nobody who worked on the ship or in wsl
    2
  3.  @kennylong7281  How can the keel of Olympic be bent went hawke is a tiny ramming ship compared to the massive 800ft long at least 90ft wide ship - It doesn't go in that far only causing a massive hole in the hull - Plus deliberately sinking it would be a dumb move... Olympic was self insured and Titanic was under insured - They lost money from the sinking because survivors would have gotten the money. This switch would also be happening in the middle of Belfast... It would be pretty noticeable
    2
  4. Yet Olympic a ship built exactly the same survived near 30 years of service...
    2
  5.  @jamie719  Just to say this.. There would be no point in switching - Titanic is under insured you cant do an insurance scam with an under insured ship- Let alone switching it with one thats SELF INSURED.. Everyone in Belfast would see this switch as thats where all maintenance was commonly done
    2
  6.  @jamie719  they are more different than you are able to see
    2
  7.  @bumbokeeo2546  no... it really didnt... considering Andrews said give or take an hour for her to sink - she lasted more than two hours
    2
  8. 21* And it was standard procedure to go full speed through ice fields
    1
  9. Follow the money that went to all of the survivors for compensation...
    1
  10.  @Dizzy19.  Well hes right about a coal bunker burning - Nothing major though as many steam ships faced that during the times - The 4th smoke stack was built for show but was operational just not like the main 3 - It vented passenger cabins, machinery space, kitchens etc etc.
    1
  11. a ship building magazine said it. nobody who built it or ran her not even WSL
    1
  12. Directly putting the ship on the collision course? Are you speaking about "hard a starboard" which means port to turn left using the tiller... Plus the captain wasnt in the bridge at the time he was sleeping
    1
  13. Wrong... Considering how many passengers there were left you wouldnt have time to load them on
    1
  14. no...
    1
  15. well blame a ship building magazine for the death of 1500 + people then because nobody of WSL said it nor the builders of the ship
    1
  16. metal mix was the norm.. hitting head on would sink it faster. ship fires were common. more life boats wouldn't matter - not enough time to fill the amount they had that night no way they could fill more
    1
  17.  @acesfn7316  please dont tell me you are a conspiracy theorist
    1
  18.  @michaelderenne9838  How can a bunker fire affect a sinking when the berg never gashed the compartment where the fire was? Common sense
    1
  19. Hard a starboard means to use the tiller to point starboard meaning the ship goes port
    1
  20. He put it to stop not reverse
    1
  21.  @timothyreed8417  You heard right! 👏
    1
  22. enough lifeboats - nope... if it sank with the same 2 hour 40 parameter it wouldn't be enough time to launch them all. stronger rivets - titanic had decent rivets for the time period. crash head on - likely would have done more harm to the ship and people on the ship than good
    1
  23. yeah that would never work
    1
  24. well we cant rescue something thats completely caked in 110 years of rust
    1
  25. nobody said any specific iceberg was on their route... they got many messages through their marconi stating ice was ahead of them...
    1
  26. Wow we have the conspiracy theorist here!
    1
  27. because it didnt do much to the ship... many steam ships had bunker fires at the time they were not major issues plus it was far back from the gash that its irrelevant to the initial start to the sinking
    1
  28. you lack common sense... the water its going through is the atlantic, in very cold water... iron has a tendency to become brittle making it easier to become damaged...
    1
  29.  @timothyreed8417  before titanics sinking the same height for the bulkheads (boilers to D i think) and same 16 titanic had before... after titanic more than 20 at least i believe 🤔with the bulkheads going from boilers to E now i believe
    1
  30. Ok but within the time frame they had - they couldnt properly launch all the lifeboats in time
    1
  31. "good" please tell me you are joking
    1
  32. that coal bunker fire was in compartment six which never got damaged by the berg... the berg going 1-5
    1
  33.  @jackdale9831  The 'switch' literally has been debunked a countless amount of times.
    1
  34.  @storyvi9530  you do realize the ship split due to high stress? of course a ship will break in two when its rear end is suspended over water and its a very heavy ship + water mass...
    1
  35. 'Unsinkable' was only said in a ship builder magazine no body building it said that nor did wsl say it plus the rivets were made standard quality
    1
  36.  @AJ-qm8cq  aha.. aha... you are so funny, saying that the way 1500+ people died is a script and was all fake, you are sickening
    1
  37. what binoculars were they using? 🤔because last i checked they were locken in a cabinet
    1
  38.  @annalopez2548  Smith was going full ahead - 21 knots
    1
  39.  @elrjames7799  no they quite literally were locked away... It is a stated fact. the man who had the cabinets key was replaced last minute before departing Southampton for New York. Also I never said it made a difference whether they had it or not
    1
  40.  @elrjames7799  ...How do you not know that a man named David Blair took the keys off with him?
    1
  41.  @elrjames7799  Dude you can literally go and look for this information yourself... Or are you completely incapable of going to do the research?
    1
  42.  @michaelderenne9838  well that wouldnt even matter anyway... the berg finished scraping the side one compartment before the coal fire compartment
    1
  43. Smith wasnt in command that night when they hit the berg... Murdoch was and he slowed to stop when nearing the berg... Also even if the ship had more than enough lifeboats not everybody could be saved in the 2 hour 40 minutes if all lifeboats couldnt have even been launched properly that were on it that night
    1
  44. you can increase speed further than full ahead - plus that would swing the rear into the berg
    1
  45. "Olympic"? explain why u think the switch happened to i can easily smack you on the back of the head with facts that disprove...
    1
  46. 21* as it was the max so 24 mph
    1
  47.  @FreeDocumentaryHistory  wow... that ship builder magazine are real aholes considering they are the ones who said it was 'Unsinkable' not anyone who built it...
    1
  48. yeah... because it was practically empty except for nurses
    1
  49.  @Truthseeker1515  the rivets were quite literally standard made... and the bulk heads went up to E deck i believe... too many compartments were gashed thats the issue
    1
  50. No... thats not better, the people in the front of the ship on most decks would likely die on impact
    1
  51. "inferior rivets" yet Olympic had similar rivets and rammed ships... Its almost as if any ships rivets get dead brittle and less durable in cold... no matter the material
    1
  52. The switch theory is a pile of bullcrap... Why switch ships when you cant get any insurane from it... Olympic was self insured and Titanic wasnt - Titanic was under insured... Also due to the large loss of lives they would lose out on money... Also at the time they werent bankrupt...
    1
  53. "missing" the key left the ship with the man who was meant to be in the crows nest... also when you have a mirage covering a massive berg due to the cold ofc its going to be hard to divert from the iceberg
    1
  54.  @timmccreery6597  the bunker fire would have done nothing to effect as most steap ships of the time had coal bunker fires - twas common
    1
  55.  @Meatislife  but nobody benefited from it other than the families who lost lives?
    1
  56. how can they collect insurance money from the under insured ship >_>
    1
  57. literally never would have helped if 40+ were on the boat. if the lifeboats it had on board at the time couldnt all be launched... whos to say nearly 50 could be?
    1
  58. No they would have sank faster doing head on...
    1
  59. wilhelm was at the hands of war... not due to an iceberg
    1
  60. a ship building magazine said it. nobody who built it or ran her not even WSL
    1