Comments by "Three \x27The Sims\x27 Cards" (@MelkorPT) on "Anger as Lithuania bans transit of goods to Russia exclave Kaliningrad" video.

Let Russia transport what they need by sea, and If they position nukes in Kaliningrad then put NATO nukes in the Baltic states.
7
@LW only if Russia carries out a nuclear first strike. If they do then yes, should we all surrender instead? Let's get this party started already, I'm sick and tired of Russian threats.
5
@LW «Better surrendered but alive, rather than proud like you but dead.» Of course you would say that, gopnik serfs like you are used to have their masters screw their wives and thank them for it in the end. I grew up in the shadow of the SS-20s and lived my life a free man, I would never surrender to a foreign tyrant.
1
@warlockgod66 «Russia got nukes in Kaliningrad already» PRECISELY. Not much of a threat, is it? Except that if Russia officially announces it's going to put nukes there then NATO can legitimately put nukes in the Baltic. Can't accuse NATO of being aggressive when you put your nukes 5 minutes from Berlin without provocation. «America already got nuclear missiles in Europe» In Western Europe, but I want NATO nukes much closer to Russia's cities so you have to time to get to shelters before our counter-strike gets you.
1
@jimmiller5455 of course, it's not the country that keeps invading its neighbours that is responsible for war, no, it's NATO that is responsible. Russia is the nation-state incarnation of a wife beater screaming "LOOK WHAT YOU MADE ME DO!"
1