Comments by "American Plague" (@American-Plague) on "Paul Joseph Watson" channel.

  1. One problem with these SJW women who want "equality and freedom" is that they want to reap all the benefits of being equal and free but when the time comes to pay the piper for equality and freedom, suddenly it's "Yeah...but I'm a woman. You can't seriously ask this of me." Let's find out what happens (for instance) when governments of the free world (Idk exactly how many countries do this...I know the US does) start sending war draft registration papers to women as well the day they turn 18.
    1
  2.  @TribalHARRY  Thanks!
    1
  3.  @Hitsyfication  Oh, one more question: I'm assuming this is a more recent phenomenon and you didn't used to be required to pay for a TV license?
    1
  4.  @Hitsyfication  Thank you! I guess $216 per year isn't that much, but still, that sounds crazy.
    1
  5.  @obviouslyasockpuppet  I'm not sure. From what I understand they can't really stop you from watching TV, but if they catch you, it's illegal. Idk about if you pay for streaming services already. Hopefully TribalHARRY can clear things up some.
    1
  6.  Kier A  I never heard of this until recently either. Apparently, in Britain, is illegal to watch even free, broadcast TV, unless you pay for a TV watching license. Crazy huh? I'd like to know how much they are too, and is it a monthly or annual charge.
    1
  7. We DO need "machine guns" (by which I assume means semi-automatic assault weapons. Fully automatic assault rifles are only legal if you have a Federal Firearms License and they are expensive and very hard to obtain). We NEED them because of the reason the Second Amendment is in place to begin with: to have the option to stop your government from becoming a tyranny should thru take that route. If all we have is snap pops and cap guns, we wouldn't pose much of a threat. And while the government isn't becoming a tyranny NOW, depending on who you ask I guess, the minute you do away with the ability to stop them, you open the door to allow it.
    1
  8. So wtf? Next we won't even be able to give a description to the police of a murderer/rapist if they're blaque and the police will have to go on a wild goose chase looking for an old, white man because to do otherwise (what would seem rational) is racist? This has gotten WAY out of hand.
    1
  9. Has anyone ever seen wood combust into flames even in an oven at 350°F? Yeah, me neither. I doubt being 100°F outside is causing that either.
    1
  10. "The Biden administration has printed more money in the last [less than] 2 years than the previous ONE HUNDRED YEARS COMBINED." Strap on your seat belts. We're about to go for a ride!
    1
  11.  @coronavirus553  Ok.... let's use another term besides the "KKK". Amid the current skyrocketing crime rate in areas with a substantial balack population (as those are the ONLY places where crime is skyrocketing), GROUPS OF PEOPLE WITH NO NAME are needed in my opinion to put a stop to it, doing the job the police aren't [allowed to] doing. The other option is to let balack criminals do whatever they want. Why do YOU support THAT?
    1
  12.  @coronavirus553  I don't HATE anyone because of the color of their skin anymore than I HATE rattlesnakes for having a rattle on their tail. Just as snakes with rattles on their tail have proven THEMSELVES to be more dangerous than others by a VERY wide margin, time and time again, so too have certain people with a certain skin tone. I prefer to not be around them and wish them all the best on their own, around their own kind, in both cases. Am I prejudiced against rattlesnakes or is it simply a wise choice to stay away from them and leave them alone to their own devices?
    1
  13.  @coronavirus553  What if you said what, exactly, about my race? Please elaborate.
    1
  14.  @Dr.YehudaBenNachmanFriedburg  "... that's never going to happen..." Oh really? You would've said that about France too only a couple of years ago. They're finally getting fed up and EXTREME right wing politicians that make Trump look like the left's Supreme hero are getting more popular every day. People here will get fed up with it too once it gets bad enough.
    1
  15.  @Dr.YehudaBenNachmanFriedburg  "...a dystopia of a White homogenous society..." Do you even know what "dystopia" even means? Explain exactly how not having balacks around, thus losing only 13/100 people, but losing roughly 60% of crime, would create a "dystopic" society. I want to hear all about how more violence is less "dystopic". I'll be waiting.
    1
  16.  @Dr.YehudaBenNachmanFriedburg  I also don't want "White only" anything. Asians don't seem to cause so much trouble. I'm not bothered by them whatsoever. I AM bothered by people who try to murder me at work. And no, this wasn't some fluke. As already stated, statistics show the balacks behave this way WAY more often than ALL OTHER RACES COMBINED. You don't think that's a problem? Maybe a bit of a "disparity"? Or do you only concern yourself with disparities when they negatively affect balacks?
    1
  17.  @Dr.YehudaBenNachmanFriedburg  Well Idk. Why don't you ask balacks to "just get along with people" and "stop worrying about some 1940's fantasy" always acting like they're being oppressed and using it for an excuse to commit crime? While you're at it, could you ask them to stop doing that WAY more than they numbers should rightly reflect? Because yes, I am MUCH more comfortable when my chances of being killed drops by nearly 60 percent. This is statistical truth and it's also my "lived experience".
    1
  18.  @eyswdsht999  cont.: ... frustrated as you honestly think you're doing some kind of good, but I hope I've helped you to think a little more logically. Maybe you can appreciate that I've actually talked to you instead of making quick claims without thinking of what the claims would actually mean for reality and then being totally disingenuous to TRY to make it appear that no such claims were ever made. I know it's not easy to climb your way out of leftist indoctrination which you are bombarded with constantly in today's society and it can be a slow and painful process but hopefully one day you will get there. Take it easy.
    1
  19.  @eyswdsht999  "could be diet, could be funding". Nope. Sorry. Can't be diet and can't be funding. Runnersof different races but from the same country from the same trainer on the same team who received the similar funding (at best, non balacks from developed countries would have better funding than balacks from 3rd world countries and it would give the non balack competitors from developed countries an advantage)) and eat the same diet as prescribed by their trainer would then generally all be equivalent. They aren't. Only balacks consistently win. So no, it can't be anything. I know YOU are too indoctrinated to BE embarrassed or
    1
  20.  @eyswdsht999  "The Peruvian stuff is your thing." The running fast because you live at high elevations and walk/ run everywhere is YOUR thing. Peruvians are something comparable who DO NOT consistently win track and field like bakacks do. And with that idiotic statement, I'm just going to write you off as a disingenuous little shyt who's not interested in facts in the least and only interested in pushing an idiotic agenda as NOBODY is this stupid as to not be able to see how I made this connection. Good night!
    1
  21.  @eyswdsht999  Or, if you're saying that generally always being the fastest of the fast is trivial, then Kodiaks generally being slightly bigger ithan Grizzlies is also trivial and we're back to my first question: why are Kodiaks a different sub species in the first place? I honestly feel SOMEWHAT sorry for people like you. You've been SO indoctrinated as to not be able to use logical reasoning and can't even see it because you're too terrified you might hurt someone's wittle feewings. I'll tell you some people who AREN'T that indoctrinated: balacks themselves. They have NO problem seeing themselves as separate and distinct from Whites and NO problem looking out for their own racial interests. That being said, we're obviously not going to get anywhere as you're incapable of using very basic, logical thinking, hence why you resorted to your personal experience with ONE Kenyan, which actually strengthened MY argument, not yours. Night!
    1
  22.  @eyswdsht999  If it's so trivial then why was that YOUR reasoning to begin with? Don't bring up something so trivial next time. Give me a NON trivial reason why balacks consistently dominate track and field.
    1
  23.  @eyswdsht999  So what's your reasoning again that Peruvians (who live at higher elevations and walk/ run everywhere) NEVER dominate (or even PLACE) in the 100m dash or marathons? Besides the nonsensical claim that "they [balacks] do it more often", which you have NO evidence for, that is.
    1
  24.  @eyswdsht999  Scientific evidence doesn't start as something and progress to something else either. That's the scientific METHOD.
    1
  25.  @eyswdsht999  And what's your SCIENTIFIC evidence that balacks "do it" more than Peruvians?
    1
  26.  @eyswdsht999  sigh, I didn't ask for your definition of science. I asked why Peruvians who live at high altitudes and walk/ run everyday NEVER win at being the fastest of the fast (not a WALKING event) and we only see this in balacks?
    1
  27.  @eyswdsht999  "because the Kenyans do all of the above more often and better. I know because I ran with one at high school, I've seen it first hand. " Where to start.... YOUR personal experience with ONE Kenyan or what YOU "have seen first hand" have no bearing here. Irrelevant for the umpteenth time. Where is ANY evidence that Kenyans "do it" more often than Peruvians? Do you have any? And yes, I already know they "do it" better. That's the fuqn point you absolute dolt. The question is WHY? This IS getting painfully desperate, isn't it?
    1
  28.  @eyswdsht999  I know it's getting old. Because you're contradicting yourself again. Your excuse for why balacks CONSISTENTLY win medals in track and field in the Olympics is because "they live at higher elevations and walk/ run everywhere", but you can't explain why Peruvians can't do the same even though they live at higher elevations and walk/ run everywhere. You simply say "they do all the time" which is again either [a VERY SERIOUS case of] misinformation or a flat out lie. No Peruvian has EVER won ANY track and field event of ANY kind. That's weird seeing as how high of an elevation they live at and they walk/ run everywhere. Nothing to do with race though. Those Peruvians must've been stopped by someone from competing.
    1
  29.  @eyswdsht999  "Peruvians aren't as quick" Well why not? According to you walking and running should've MADE them quick. That was your reasoning for balacks wasn't it?
    1
  30.  @eyswdsht999  Hello? Why don't high altitude Peruvians who walk and run everywhere compete in track and field on an Olympic level and win if race isn't "everything" (whatever that even means. Your word, not mine). Did the CCP stop them too? Did the CCP stop EVERY other race who live at high altitudes and walk/ run everywhere?
    1
  31.  @eyswdsht999  Ohhhh... the CCP doesn't allow it. What a great excuse! Why don't we see descendants of native populations living at high elevations from ANY OTHER PLACE ON EARTH who walk and run everywhere dominating track and field? Why is it ONLY balack? Yet again: are you dip shyts capable of thinking rationally?
    1
  32.  @eyswdsht999  Go research 2 repeat allele MAOA gene and get back to me with more excuses you fuqn idiot.
    1
  33.  @eyswdsht999  It's NOT unproven that balacks are more likely to be dangerous. Once again your ignorance is showing. Balack males are FIFTY TWO TIMES more likely to carry the 2 repeat allele MAOA gene than Whites. YOU need to do more research. Just because you've only been told what leftists want you to hear does NOT mean you are correct. Please search "2 repeat allele MAOA gene" before you make any more ridiculously stupid claims.
    1
  34.  @eyswdsht999  And I certainly don't know of even ONE White who wants to rape a balack. In fact, there have been years that NOT ONE SINGLE balack had reported to law enforcement of being raped by a White. It's hilarious that you'd even think any significant amount of the White population would ever even CONSIDER this. Lmfao. Disgusting!
    1
  35.  @eyswdsht999  "because they were born at significantly higher elevations and have to walk/ run everywhere". I mean hell....if that's the case why aren't we seeing Tibetans CONSTANTLY blowing away the competition in track and field in the Olympics? I'll ask yet again: Do you idiots ever sit down and take a long, hard look at the things you say?
    1
  36.  @eyswdsht999  They were born at higher elevations and walk/ run everywhere? Then why are ones born in America or elsewhere at lower elevations who don't walk/ run everywhere just as likely to be just as fast? That's WEIRD isn't it? It's ALMOST like there's some kind of invisible force at work here...... almost like over time they have evolved to be faster... ALMOST like how different sub species evolve....🤔 This isn't hard.
    1
  37.  @eyswdsht999  So Kodiak Bears being slightly larger on average plus being geographically isolated for 10 thousand years plus VERY SLIGHT genetic difference is a good reason to place them as a different sub species.... but balacks being slightly faster and darker on average (or Whites being slightly slower and lighter on average.. whichever way you want to say it) plus being geographically isolated for 70 thousand years plus being more genetically distinct than the previously mentioned sub species means NOTHING. Again: do you idiots ever sit down and take a long, hard look at the things you say?
    1
  38.  @eyswdsht999  are your back to smoking drugs again? "Creatures that have never been proven to exist". Lmfao. Do you think "ghost population" means that they possibly didn't exist? Wtf are you even on about?
    1
  39.  @eyswdsht999  Do you idiots even listen to yourselves? Your explanation for the divergence of 2 sub species of bear is 1 bear species splitting into 2 populations and being geographically isolated for 12,000 years, all the while TOTALLY IGNORING the fact that the SAME EXACT THING happened to humans except they split and were geographically isolated for 70,000 years, not to mention the 2 groups then began breeding with TOTALLY DIFFERENT SPECIES..... but somehow this made NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL! I mean come on, NOBODY can be this stupid. Not even the most heavily indoctrinated leftist. You've GOT to be simply virtue signaling.
    1
  40.  @eyswdsht999  And I'm sorry I can't leave links. Obviously YouTube doesn't want any inconvenient little truths getting shared. You can look these numbers up for yourself in about 3 seconds if you just took the time to look instead of repeating only the PARTIALLY correct PARTIAL stories that the woke want you to hear.
    1
  41.  @eyswdsht999  Some non sub Saharans (as sub Saharans have none) also have 3% Neanderthal. West Africans have from TWO TO NINETEEN PERCENT ghost population (most likely Homo Erectus) DNA in them. This gives us a maximum difference of up to a TWENTY TWO PERCENT DIFFERENCE. You don't think that's more significant than "Elizabeth Warren being 'Native American'"?
    1
  42.  @eyswdsht999  Tf are you smoking? Are you serious? Scientists have never shown that their DNA is in modern humans?
    1
  43.  @eyswdsht999  So I guess Neanderthal, Homo Sapiens, Denisovams and Homo Erectis are all the sane species then, correct?
    1
  44.  @eyswdsht999  The arrangement of your features do not have anything to do with your intelligence... correct. However, your RACE ABSOLUTELY DOES (ON AVERAGE) have something to do with intelligence. This has been proven NUMEROUS times. This is why idiots like you must resort to making excuses like "IQ tests don't mean anything!".
    1
  45.  @eyswdsht999  🥱 Any other nonsense you'd like to flap your gums about? "Disingenuous". Lol. Is that anything like believing in "studies" that have nearly ALL been done in a biased manner because to even SUGGEST that races may actually be different will end your career and thus, life, like it did for who is arguably THE world's most foremost authority on genetics, Dr. James Watson, who was canceled just for SUGGESTING a POSSIBILITY? Gtfo of here. Why the need to totally silence people like him if he's so demonstrably wrong?
    1
  46.  @성이름-e8l7x  When Trump says no to these people, he's the worst scumbag on the planet (according to leftist idiots who WANT to import the most dangerous people on Earth). Whites need to wake up, stop falling for this "diversity" garbage, start being more like the Japanese and look out for their own interests because NOBODY ELSE is going to.
    1
  47.  @성이름-e8l7x  Of course they said no to black Muslims. Japanese are smart and don't suffer from the mental illness of extreme altruism that many Whites suffer from.
    1
  48.  @eadecamp  I don't blame them. They can clearly see what's happening everywhere on Earth where diversity is being forced and they want no part of it. Hopefully they'll revolt or something and FORCE their government to put a stop to it.
    1
  49.  @garmingarry  So we should put all our personal information out on a public platform and further risk things like identity theft just to satisfy YOU or to prove something to YOU? GTFO! Idiot.
    1
  50.  @HonorableBeniah-A  Stop the anti-Whitism
    1