Comments by "American Plague" (@American-Plague) on "Diversityland" video.

  1.  @simplythebest286  Asians are intelligent. They aren't going to let almost ANYONE migrate there who aren't Asian. This is what Whites should be doing. Weird how we never hear about Japanese supremacy and I don't think they'd care if anyone did accuse them of that. I have nothing but the utmost respect for the Japanese in this regard.
    102
  2.  @LilyGazou  No problem. Blacks will follow wherever you run to, if permitted. In the Deep South of the U.S. we used to have patrols of hooded, masked men roaming the country side who took care of these kinds of problems.
    62
  3. Well, you're going to HAVE to use violence at this point if you want to get anything back even CLOSE to how it once was and it better happen fairly soon or you'll be outnumbered and then there won't be ANY answer.
    37
  4.  @usncorpsman7966  Japanese also say no blacks, no Hispanics, no Arabs, no Whites and not even any other Asians. I respect that and wish Whites would wake tf up. I mean if diversity is such a strength, why does Japan have such an extremely low crime rate?
    28
  5. This is the case for ALL Western [White] countries.
    20
  6. Odd how what are quickly becoming the best places on Earth to live are what were previously behind the Iron Curtain. Who knew that that would eventually be a blessing?
    13
  7.  @Attmay  OK. What are you trying to say?
    8
  8.  @eyswdsht999  So stating scientific facts that make you cry are now "ad hominems"? Lol. How did I know a response like this was coming?
    5
  9.  @davebenz8271  EVERY state governor needs to take a lesson from Greg Abbot.
    5
  10.  @huwhitecavebeast1972  Renaissance
    5
  11.  @huwhitecavebeast1972  Are you aware of (I can't type both words out or Woketube will delete my comment so I'll leave the first word of the organization as the last word in this comment and the second word of the organization as the only word in my next comment) : American
    5
  12.  @eyswdsht999  So we have different races (or whatever term you prefer) who have bigger genetic differences than, let's say Grizzly Bears and Kodiak Bears, which are different sub species by the way, but these different races don't exist. Correct?
    5
  13.  @eyswdsht999  Lol. It's scientific fact whether I or anyone else use it for confirmation bias or not. I assume you agree that it's scientifically true that smoking is bad for you. Does this mean that you're using this scientific fact as "confirmation bias" that you are correct that smoking is bad for you and people shouldn't be smoking if they don't want to get cancer? And I am waiting for a proper response to my question about how can 2 different animals (Grizzly Bears and Kodiak Bears were my example) can be more similar than balacks and Whites, but be different sub species while at the same time, races don't exist? AFTER you answer that and explain what your "thesis" even is, I'll try to properly respond.
    5
  14.  @huwhitecavebeast1972  If not, I highly suggest you check it out.
    4
  15.  @eyswdsht999  "I follow the science.... but only the science that corroborates my beliefs! Any science that says otherwise is untrue and we shouldn't look into it any further because it's waycist!"
    4
  16.  @eyswdsht999  ENVIRONMENTAL factors and being geographically isolated for LONGER than 12,000 years is EXACTLY what caused different races to emerge. Kodiak Bears and Grizzly Bears also share 99.9% of their DNA and they can also interbreed, which was my point: How is it that they are a different sub species but human races don't exist? Not to mention different species CAN and DO interbreed or we wouldn't have any Neanderthal DNA at all, would we?
    4
  17.  @eyswdsht999  "honored you". Lmfao. What a lame excuse to not answer my question. Why exactly do you refuse to answer a very simple question? If Kodiak Bears and Grizzly Bears are more closely related than balacks and Whites, how is it that they are different sub species but human races don't exist? You can't HONOR ME by answering the first question I asked? Not to mention, you aren't exactly honoring ANYTHING by providing incorrect information like that only 1% of people globally are part a different species genetically. That's misinformation and maybe a straight up lie.
    4
  18.  @eyswdsht999  Where did you go all of the sudden? Let me guess: you have "better things to do" or "don't have time to argue with someone so ignorant" as me I bet. Something like that. Right? Lol.
    4
  19.  @eyswdsht999  'Kodiak Bears are slightly larger on average." So what? Balacks are slightly faster on average. Once again your "point" EXACTLY MIRRORS the differences between races and only strengthens what I'm saying. Thank you.
    3
  20.  @eyswdsht999  Or perhaps you'd like to point out EXACTLY what I "came up with" and why is it an ad hominem? You know, as opposed to throwing out a very vague statement that I "came up with an ad hominem SOMEWHERE", and then running away.
    3
  21.  @eyswdsht999  Humans spread all over the globe and remained GEOGRAPHICALLY ISOLATED for MUCH longer than 12,000 years (which is EXACTLY how you explain the divergence of Kodiak Bears and Grizzly Bears) and only VERY RECENTLY did the different races spread globally. Lions, tigers, jaguars and leopards spread all over the globe from a common ancestor and then remained geographically isolated for tens of thousands of years. How is this ANY DIFFERENT from what humans did? And if different ENVIRONMENTAL factors didn't cause the different races to appear, what exactly DID? If ENVIRONMENTAL factors DID cause the races to emerge after being geographically separated for tens of thousands of years, and the human races are less closely related to each other than Kodiak Bears and Grizzly Bears, then back to my original question: HOW CAN KODIAK BEARS AND GRIZZLY BEARS BE DIFFERENT SUB SPECIES BUT HUMAN RACES DON'T EXIST? Do you idiots even listen to yourselves?
    3
  22.  @eyswdsht999  Sure sounds like you've been smoking something.
    3
  23.  @eyswdsht999  Why don't high altitude Peruvians constantly win track and field? Why don't we see peasant Chinese living at high altitudes who walk and run everywhere winning? Did the CCP stop them too and decide to put in slower citizens for some reason?
    3
  24.  @eyswdsht999  And is it the high altitudes or the walking and running? If it's the high altitudes we can conclude that anyone born and raised in low altitudes cannot be dominating, and that simply isn't true. So I'm pretty sure the high altitudes don't have anything to do with it. That leaves walking and running. Why can't ANYONE who is always walking and running CONSISTENTLY beat balacks in track and field if race isn't "everything"?
    3
  25.  @eyswdsht999  "true. If you consider 1% significant". You DID say "anything like that". You did through omitting that it CAN be up to 3% for non sub Saharans and as high as 19% for sub Saharans.
    3
  26.  @eyswdsht999  Another idiotic statement. Who said balackness is what CAUSES speed? What a stupid thing to say. And you're totally incorrect again. WEST Africans constantly dominate shorter sprints. And to repeat, if it's ONLY a combination of balance, walking and running, you still haven't explained why we don't see Tibetans dominating track and field?
    3
  27.  @eyswdsht999  "Is one lifestyle superior to another?" Whether I THINK one is superior to another is again, irrelevant. What I or YOU THINK has no bearing whatsoever on Kodiaks and Grizzlies being distinctly different and the same applies to every other species, including humans. In short, your feelings don't matter.
    3
  28.  @eyswdsht999  "it is a scientific fact that smoking causes cancer" Just as it's a scientific fact that there's more genetic variation between races than there is between Kodiaks and Grizzlies. You stating one is scientific fact does not negate something else from being scientific fact so yet again: IRRELEVANT.
    3
  29.  @eyswdsht999  Not to mention, statistics SHOW YEAR AFTER YEAR and DECADE AFTER DECADE that balacks are much more likely to be dangerous. This is saying nothing of the 2 repeat allele MAOA gene which probably goes a VERY long way to making the statistics what they are.
    3
  30.  @eyswdsht999  I asked why don't we see Tibetans blowing away the competition in track and field at the Olympics if being faster only comes down to being born at higher elevations and walking/ running everywhere?
    3
  31.  @eyswdsht999  I did say this, at which point you said "it's about culture" and not race, which is why I brought evolution into it. It IS about race because different races DO exist and DO generally behave differently. The fact that you nor anyone else can explain what makes something a different sub species without bringing up points that are EXACTLY THE SAME in human races and their evolutionary history show this to be true.
    3
  32.  @eyswdsht999  So you have admitted that different races DO exist and they exist for the same reasons that sub species exist. Sub species are WELL KNOWN to exhibit different behaviors regardless of what environmental factors they were born into but I'm supposed to believe that when it comes to humans, race doesn't matter AT ALL for some unexplained reason and it's ALL explained by environment? What a bunch of contradicting nonsense!
    3
  33.  @eyswdsht999  "But I seen a balack guy run fast once in high school!" 😂🤣😂🤣 Sorry but that was pretty funny!
    2
  34.  @eyswdsht999  Your nonsense just goes from one poorly thought out excuse to another.
    2
  35.  @eyswdsht999  Also, could you please define "species" for me? I'm curious what draws the line between 2 different species.
    2
  36.  @recline69  I know EXACTLY what I'm talking about. Just because you believe absolute nonsense, that doesn't say anything about me. "they hold similar cultural and moral beliefs". Yeah. Exactly why diversity is the worst idea ever and we don't need it.
    2
  37.  @eyswdsht999  Speaking of not being sure if someone knows how science works, I find that statement coming out of the mouth of someone who invokes what they "have seen first hand" as scientific evidence absolutely hilarious. 😂
    2
  38.  @eyswdsht999  At least we know the CCP doesn't stop Peruvians from competing. Glad that's cleared up. What then IS stopping Peruvians, who live at higher elevations and walk/ run everywhere, from consistently dominating marathons or the 100 meter dash (for instances)? SURELY it's nothing to do with race.
    2
  39.  @eyswdsht999  Where did I say that I'm justifying murder, rape or slavery? Now you're putting words into my mouth along with contradicting yourself. What I said was we used to have groups of people who kept these people who ARE MORE LIKELY to be violent away from us. What's wrong with wanting to keep people who are more likely to be violent away from oneself?
    2
  40.  @eyswdsht999  "they won gold at the world athletics championship a month ago". In what? Running? I mean, it SHOULD be running right? Because they live a high elevations and walk and run everywhere. Did they win gold In a running event? NO. It was a WALKING race. Lmfao. Why can't Peruvians be THE FASTEST OF THE FAST since they live at high elevations and walk/ run everywhere? This was your excuse to why balacks CAN and DO consistently do it.
    2
  41.  @eyswdsht999  When YouTube stops deleting my comments for spelling balacks correctly, I'll start spelling it correctly. Once again, a completely idiotic and irrelevant thing to say.
    2
  42.  @eyswdsht999  Now that we have cleared up all your nonsense that you throw in to try to confuse people, will you "honor me" by giving an ACTUAL answer to my original question: how can Kodiaks and Grizzlies be distinct sub species if they are more closely related to one another than balacks are to Whites and at the same time, human races don't even exist? What it SOUNDS like when you start bringing highly subjective questions into it like "is one superior to another?" is that YOU are actually relying on feelings instead of facts. Maybe evolution just stopped ONLY in humans and ONLY within the last 70,000 years or so since sub Saharans first became geographically isolated from everyone else (then others became geographically isolated later on and for shorter periods of time) , for totally unexplained reasons, huh? 🤣😂🤣
    2
  43.  @eyswdsht999  This is getting HILARIOUS! You're telling me that Peruvians "do all the time" defeat balacks in track and field?
    2
  44.  @eyswdsht999  Wait.... WHAT?! Hahahaha! When was the last Peruvian who won gold in track and field in the Olympics? Or silver or Bronze or even PLACED?
    2
  45.  @eyswdsht999  So Kodiak Bears being slightly larger on average plus being geographically isolated for 10 thousand years plus VERY SLIGHT genetic difference is a good reason to place them as a different sub species.... but balacks being slightly faster and darker on average (or Whites being slightly slower and lighter on average.. whichever way you want to say it) plus being geographically isolated for 70 thousand years plus being more genetically distinct than the previously mentioned sub species means NOTHING. Again: do you idiots ever sit down and take a long, hard look at the things you say?
    1
  46.  @eyswdsht999  Ohhhh... the CCP doesn't allow it. What a great excuse! Why don't we see descendants of native populations living at high elevations from ANY OTHER PLACE ON EARTH who walk and run everywhere dominating track and field? Why is it ONLY balack? Yet again: are you dip shyts capable of thinking rationally?
    1
  47.  @eyswdsht999  Some non sub Saharans (as sub Saharans have none) also have 3% Neanderthal. West Africans have from TWO TO NINETEEN PERCENT ghost population (most likely Homo Erectus) DNA in them. This gives us a maximum difference of up to a TWENTY TWO PERCENT DIFFERENCE. You don't think that's more significant than "Elizabeth Warren being 'Native American'"?
    1
  48.  @성이름-e8l7x  Of course they said no to black Muslims. Japanese are smart and don't suffer from the mental illness of extreme altruism that many Whites suffer from.
    1
  49.  @eyswdsht999  Hello? Why don't high altitude Peruvians who walk and run everywhere compete in track and field on an Olympic level and win if race isn't "everything" (whatever that even means. Your word, not mine). Did the CCP stop them too? Did the CCP stop EVERY other race who live at high altitudes and walk/ run everywhere?
    1
  50.  @eyswdsht999  Tf are you smoking? Are you serious? Scientists have never shown that their DNA is in modern humans?
    1
  51.  @eyswdsht999  "Peruvians aren't as quick" Well why not? According to you walking and running should've MADE them quick. That was your reasoning for balacks wasn't it?
    1
  52.  @eyswdsht999  Go research 2 repeat allele MAOA gene and get back to me with more excuses you fuqn idiot.
    1
  53.  @eadecamp  I don't blame them. They can clearly see what's happening everywhere on Earth where diversity is being forced and they want no part of it. Hopefully they'll revolt or something and FORCE their government to put a stop to it.
    1
  54.  @eyswdsht999  I know it's getting old. Because you're contradicting yourself again. Your excuse for why balacks CONSISTENTLY win medals in track and field in the Olympics is because "they live at higher elevations and walk/ run everywhere", but you can't explain why Peruvians can't do the same even though they live at higher elevations and walk/ run everywhere. You simply say "they do all the time" which is again either [a VERY SERIOUS case of] misinformation or a flat out lie. No Peruvian has EVER won ANY track and field event of ANY kind. That's weird seeing as how high of an elevation they live at and they walk/ run everywhere. Nothing to do with race though. Those Peruvians must've been stopped by someone from competing.
    1
  55.  @eyswdsht999  It's NOT unproven that balacks are more likely to be dangerous. Once again your ignorance is showing. Balack males are FIFTY TWO TIMES more likely to carry the 2 repeat allele MAOA gene than Whites. YOU need to do more research. Just because you've only been told what leftists want you to hear does NOT mean you are correct. Please search "2 repeat allele MAOA gene" before you make any more ridiculously stupid claims.
    1
  56.  @eyswdsht999  And I certainly don't know of even ONE White who wants to rape a balack. In fact, there have been years that NOT ONE SINGLE balack had reported to law enforcement of being raped by a White. It's hilarious that you'd even think any significant amount of the White population would ever even CONSIDER this. Lmfao. Disgusting!
    1
  57.  @eyswdsht999  Do you idiots even listen to yourselves? Your explanation for the divergence of 2 sub species of bear is 1 bear species splitting into 2 populations and being geographically isolated for 12,000 years, all the while TOTALLY IGNORING the fact that the SAME EXACT THING happened to humans except they split and were geographically isolated for 70,000 years, not to mention the 2 groups then began breeding with TOTALLY DIFFERENT SPECIES..... but somehow this made NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL! I mean come on, NOBODY can be this stupid. Not even the most heavily indoctrinated leftist. You've GOT to be simply virtue signaling.
    1
  58.  @eyswdsht999  "because the Kenyans do all of the above more often and better. I know because I ran with one at high school, I've seen it first hand. " Where to start.... YOUR personal experience with ONE Kenyan or what YOU "have seen first hand" have no bearing here. Irrelevant for the umpteenth time. Where is ANY evidence that Kenyans "do it" more often than Peruvians? Do you have any? And yes, I already know they "do it" better. That's the fuqn point you absolute dolt. The question is WHY? This IS getting painfully desperate, isn't it?
    1
  59.  @eyswdsht999  "because they were born at significantly higher elevations and have to walk/ run everywhere". I mean hell....if that's the case why aren't we seeing Tibetans CONSTANTLY blowing away the competition in track and field in the Olympics? I'll ask yet again: Do you idiots ever sit down and take a long, hard look at the things you say?
    1
  60.  @eyswdsht999  sigh, I didn't ask for your definition of science. I asked why Peruvians who live at high altitudes and walk/ run everyday NEVER win at being the fastest of the fast (not a WALKING event) and we only see this in balacks?
    1
  61.  @eyswdsht999  And what's your SCIENTIFIC evidence that balacks "do it" more than Peruvians?
    1
  62.  @eyswdsht999  Scientific evidence doesn't start as something and progress to something else either. That's the scientific METHOD.
    1
  63.  @eyswdsht999  So what's your reasoning again that Peruvians (who live at higher elevations and walk/ run everywhere) NEVER dominate (or even PLACE) in the 100m dash or marathons? Besides the nonsensical claim that "they [balacks] do it more often", which you have NO evidence for, that is.
    1
  64.  @eyswdsht999  If it's so trivial then why was that YOUR reasoning to begin with? Don't bring up something so trivial next time. Give me a NON trivial reason why balacks consistently dominate track and field.
    1
  65.  @eyswdsht999  Or, if you're saying that generally always being the fastest of the fast is trivial, then Kodiaks generally being slightly bigger ithan Grizzlies is also trivial and we're back to my first question: why are Kodiaks a different sub species in the first place? I honestly feel SOMEWHAT sorry for people like you. You've been SO indoctrinated as to not be able to use logical reasoning and can't even see it because you're too terrified you might hurt someone's wittle feewings. I'll tell you some people who AREN'T that indoctrinated: balacks themselves. They have NO problem seeing themselves as separate and distinct from Whites and NO problem looking out for their own racial interests. That being said, we're obviously not going to get anywhere as you're incapable of using very basic, logical thinking, hence why you resorted to your personal experience with ONE Kenyan, which actually strengthened MY argument, not yours. Night!
    1
  66.  @eyswdsht999  So I guess Neanderthal, Homo Sapiens, Denisovams and Homo Erectis are all the sane species then, correct?
    1
  67.  @eyswdsht999  "The Peruvian stuff is your thing." The running fast because you live at high elevations and walk/ run everywhere is YOUR thing. Peruvians are something comparable who DO NOT consistently win track and field like bakacks do. And with that idiotic statement, I'm just going to write you off as a disingenuous little shyt who's not interested in facts in the least and only interested in pushing an idiotic agenda as NOBODY is this stupid as to not be able to see how I made this connection. Good night!
    1
  68.  @eyswdsht999  "could be diet, could be funding". Nope. Sorry. Can't be diet and can't be funding. Runnersof different races but from the same country from the same trainer on the same team who received the similar funding (at best, non balacks from developed countries would have better funding than balacks from 3rd world countries and it would give the non balack competitors from developed countries an advantage)) and eat the same diet as prescribed by their trainer would then generally all be equivalent. They aren't. Only balacks consistently win. So no, it can't be anything. I know YOU are too indoctrinated to BE embarrassed or
    1
  69.  @eyswdsht999  cont.: ... frustrated as you honestly think you're doing some kind of good, but I hope I've helped you to think a little more logically. Maybe you can appreciate that I've actually talked to you instead of making quick claims without thinking of what the claims would actually mean for reality and then being totally disingenuous to TRY to make it appear that no such claims were ever made. I know it's not easy to climb your way out of leftist indoctrination which you are bombarded with constantly in today's society and it can be a slow and painful process but hopefully one day you will get there. Take it easy.
    1
  70.  @eyswdsht999  They were born at higher elevations and walk/ run everywhere? Then why are ones born in America or elsewhere at lower elevations who don't walk/ run everywhere just as likely to be just as fast? That's WEIRD isn't it? It's ALMOST like there's some kind of invisible force at work here...... almost like over time they have evolved to be faster... ALMOST like how different sub species evolve....🤔 This isn't hard.
    1
  71.  @Dr.YehudaBenNachmanFriedburg  Well Idk. Why don't you ask balacks to "just get along with people" and "stop worrying about some 1940's fantasy" always acting like they're being oppressed and using it for an excuse to commit crime? While you're at it, could you ask them to stop doing that WAY more than they numbers should rightly reflect? Because yes, I am MUCH more comfortable when my chances of being killed drops by nearly 60 percent. This is statistical truth and it's also my "lived experience".
    1
  72.  @Dr.YehudaBenNachmanFriedburg  I also don't want "White only" anything. Asians don't seem to cause so much trouble. I'm not bothered by them whatsoever. I AM bothered by people who try to murder me at work. And no, this wasn't some fluke. As already stated, statistics show the balacks behave this way WAY more often than ALL OTHER RACES COMBINED. You don't think that's a problem? Maybe a bit of a "disparity"? Or do you only concern yourself with disparities when they negatively affect balacks?
    1
  73.  @Dr.YehudaBenNachmanFriedburg  "...a dystopia of a White homogenous society..." Do you even know what "dystopia" even means? Explain exactly how not having balacks around, thus losing only 13/100 people, but losing roughly 60% of crime, would create a "dystopic" society. I want to hear all about how more violence is less "dystopic". I'll be waiting.
    1
  74.  @Dr.YehudaBenNachmanFriedburg  "... that's never going to happen..." Oh really? You would've said that about France too only a couple of years ago. They're finally getting fed up and EXTREME right wing politicians that make Trump look like the left's Supreme hero are getting more popular every day. People here will get fed up with it too once it gets bad enough.
    1
  75.  @coronavirus553  What if you said what, exactly, about my race? Please elaborate.
    1
  76.  @coronavirus553  I don't HATE anyone because of the color of their skin anymore than I HATE rattlesnakes for having a rattle on their tail. Just as snakes with rattles on their tail have proven THEMSELVES to be more dangerous than others by a VERY wide margin, time and time again, so too have certain people with a certain skin tone. I prefer to not be around them and wish them all the best on their own, around their own kind, in both cases. Am I prejudiced against rattlesnakes or is it simply a wise choice to stay away from them and leave them alone to their own devices?
    1
  77.  @coronavirus553  Ok.... let's use another term besides the "KKK". Amid the current skyrocketing crime rate in areas with a substantial balack population (as those are the ONLY places where crime is skyrocketing), GROUPS OF PEOPLE WITH NO NAME are needed in my opinion to put a stop to it, doing the job the police aren't [allowed to] doing. The other option is to let balack criminals do whatever they want. Why do YOU support THAT?
    1
  78.  @garmingarry  So we should put all our personal information out on a public platform and further risk things like identity theft just to satisfy YOU or to prove something to YOU? GTFO! Idiot.
    1
  79. "The Biden administration has printed more money in the last [less than] 2 years than the previous ONE HUNDRED YEARS COMBINED." Strap on your seat belts. We're about to go for a ride!
    1
  80.  @eyswdsht999  The arrangement of your features do not have anything to do with your intelligence... correct. However, your RACE ABSOLUTELY DOES (ON AVERAGE) have something to do with intelligence. This has been proven NUMEROUS times. This is why idiots like you must resort to making excuses like "IQ tests don't mean anything!".
    1
  81.  @eyswdsht999  are your back to smoking drugs again? "Creatures that have never been proven to exist". Lmfao. Do you think "ghost population" means that they possibly didn't exist? Wtf are you even on about?
    1
  82.  @eyswdsht999  🥱 Any other nonsense you'd like to flap your gums about? "Disingenuous". Lol. Is that anything like believing in "studies" that have nearly ALL been done in a biased manner because to even SUGGEST that races may actually be different will end your career and thus, life, like it did for who is arguably THE world's most foremost authority on genetics, Dr. James Watson, who was canceled just for SUGGESTING a POSSIBILITY? Gtfo of here. Why the need to totally silence people like him if he's so demonstrably wrong?
    1
  83.  @성이름-e8l7x  When Trump says no to these people, he's the worst scumbag on the planet (according to leftist idiots who WANT to import the most dangerous people on Earth). Whites need to wake up, stop falling for this "diversity" garbage, start being more like the Japanese and look out for their own interests because NOBODY ELSE is going to.
    1
  84.  @eyswdsht999  And I'm sorry I can't leave links. Obviously YouTube doesn't want any inconvenient little truths getting shared. You can look these numbers up for yourself in about 3 seconds if you just took the time to look instead of repeating only the PARTIALLY correct PARTIAL stories that the woke want you to hear.
    1