Comments by "No Fate But What We Make" (@SonoftheAllfather) on "Hydrogen Hillary Clintons' "Liberated" Libya is a Hellhole of Slavery and Civil War" video.

The statement itself is true in a modern sense. Whites were also instrumental in banning the slave trade and abolishing slavery all throughout the world. It's very likely (based upon the fact that many African and Middle Eastern countries revert back to slavery as soon as government crumbles) that slavery or the slave trade would never have been banned or abolished if it weren't for the efforts of White countries and the postnational organizations they created.
3
@Inisfad: "A long diatribe which only proves that whites had slaves to begin with." Bullshit. The comment proved that Whites were the only ones with both the political power and moral will to make it a point to ban the slave trade and pressure other countries, mostly African and Middle Eastern countries full of non-Whites, to outlaw the slave trade and abolish slavery. Of course, all that you in your small and cognitively dissonant mind construed from that "diatribe" was that Whites owned slaves, which no one, including myself, ever denied. The fact of the matter is that, while Whites enslaved other human beings of other races, so to did non-Whites, and their practice of slavery predated the Transatlantic Slave Trade by millennia and postdated it by over a century. Whites did not invent slavery and collectively carry no more or less onus than any other group of people in the grand scheme of things. In addition, no other race of people besides Whites can claim as much responsibility for helping to end the slave trade and abolish slavery in the modern world, and it isn't even close. Yet Whites are demonized for our role in slavery FAR more than other races, some of which still practice slavery to this day en masse. Whites are not given credit for this accomplishment, simply because Whites enslaved others, but at least we say the err of our ways and helped to make monumental changes in the world. Now historically White countries have the highest human development indexes in the world. This is something no one can deny if they are academically honest. I also never said that Whites don't treat each other or other races like shit as well, only that Blacks clearly treat others and each other worse on average. Simply look at the state of Africa and the amount of human misery there. Look at the murder rates, even in first world countries, carried out by Blacks upon other Blacks. Look at the child abuse, domestic violence, gang violence, etc. Look at Haiti, where, as Styx said in the video, 1 in 20 Blacks are enslaved by other Blacks. There is no comparison in a modern context. White people on average treat people of all races, including their own, better than Black people treat people of other races, including their own. It isn't that hard to see, if you have an honest and open mind. Someone like you only sees things the way you want to see them. That much is clear. I remember you by the way. You are an incredibly disingenuous person, so it really doesn't surprise me that you would reduce my previous comment to such a simplistic, biased, and ignorant statement as "it only proves that whites had slaves to begin with." Pathetic.
3
Yes they were outlawing it where it had been previously legal, in both Western countries and colonies, and pressuring non-White countries into outlawed both the trade and practice. They were not "indulging" in it once slavery was abolished, at least not legally. This is true of other nations as well. Slavery is illegal by law in most of the countries that still have large-scale issues with slavery, but the government is too incompetent or compromised to enforce the law. It doesn't make a difference who invented it, you're right, and that is something that is totally impossible to know (who did invent it). However, it is important to understand that Whites did not invent it because many are led to believe by the Left and their Black/Brown extremist cohorts that Whites did invent it. That is part of the anti-White narrative that these groups peddle. So it does make a difference to state that Western Whites were not the inventors of slavery, we didn't practive slavery any more or less than any other race, and various other facts that give a person a more rounded view of the history of slavery. It is a subject that is very often used in a myopic way to demonize Whites and victimize other races.
3
@ Inisfad: So, because Clinton (who was appointed by a Black president, not elected by the majority White masses) was part of the administration that destroyed Gaddafi, the entire White race bears the onus of the European migration debacle? Wow. That is the most retarded thing I've read today, and I've been reading idiotic Leftist opinion pieces all morning. Just a reminder: most White people in the U.S. would like to see Hillary Clinton in prison or dead. The fact that she was put in the position where she had the power to influence world politics is more the fault of the rainbow coalition and Leftist white women than White people in general. So who really is to blame for the Libyan government being toppled and the ensuing barbarisms that are occurring there? Who put Clinton and Obama in power? I'll bet you anything that it was YOU and people like omgmatthew100. omgmatthew100 seems to think it is the fault of Europeans, who have already allowed millions of culturally incapable non-White migrants into their countries, given them welfare, given them housing, given them food and clothing and jobs...and have even dealt with their crimes and terrorism as a result. Why can't you Leftists ever hold a non-White or impoverished person responsible for their own actions? I am White, and I'm not voting for people that want to destabilize countries. I'm not supporting those actions. I'm not forcing Black Africans to enter Libya and try to invade Europe. I'm not forcing Libyans to enslave Blacks. So how the fuck am I responsible for any of that? Why is it that every inhumane act carried out by non-Whites is the fault of Whites somehow?
1
@Inisfad: I'm well aware of that fact, and the fact that Gaddafi asked for money from the EU and they laughed at him. I'm not disputing that. I'm disputing who's fault it is that the Gaddafi regime was destroyed and "the cork was removed" from the African bottle. You say it was Clinton. I agree. You also imply in the same post that Whites are destructive and bear the onus of Clinton and Obama's mistake somehow. I am saying that the reason Clinton and Obama were in power was more the fault of minorities and White women than it was White people in general. Only 38% of Whites voted for Obama in 2012. Blacks, Asians, Hispanics: 93%, 73%, 71% respectively. 78% of single White women voted Obama. These numbers were similar in 2016, when Clinton was running. So how is it that White people are to blame for the actions of Clinton and Obama? How is it White people's fault that Arabs are still enslaving Blacks? They've been doing it since 650 CE, and didn't stop until Whites forced them to stop in the 20th century.
1
@Inidfad: Yes, they were the globalist choice. Whites are generally more anti-globalist and supportive of limited government. Globalist, big-government types (both neoliberal and neocon) are the warhawks that go around the world bombing non-White countries, and even White countries sometimes (you might recall Clinton's administration bombed SERBIA). Still, to say that Whites destroy every non-White person and nation they make contact with (now or historically) and turn it into something worse than it was before is nothing but pure anti-White, anti-American, postmodernist, ethno-Marxist drivel. My previous post demonstrated how European powers banned the slave trade and abolished slavery in their own countries and colonies around a century (on average) before African and Arab countries did. They established nation-states in Africa and the Middle East that could actually effect the rule of law upon the peoples of those regions and at least marginally enforce some ethical and legal standards. Still, most African and Arab countries did not ban the slave trade or abolish slavery until the mid to late 20th century, and they only did so because postnational organizations that Whites were instrumental in creating and operating forced them to do so. Britain forced dozens of African and Arab states into treaties that forced them to abolish slavery. The Brussels Conference Act of 1890 and the 1926 League of Nations Slavery Convention (which 99 countries have signed, acceded to, ratified, or succeeded to) were both engineered by American and European Whites. People seem to forget that Africa and the Middle East were both hellscapes even before European powers futilely meddled there. So much criticism and demonization is peddled against Whites for their historical transgressions and everyone else gets a free pass. Black and brown races, for the most part, treat each other like shit and always have, whether they are in Third World hellholes or they're in First World historically White countries like the U.S. They've done FAR less than Whites have to modernize the world and stop barbaric, inhumane acts like slavery. Yet, we are blamed the most. It is a massive load of bullshit, and perpetuated by White-guilt ridden people like you.
1