Comments by "" (@kallachi729) on "DEI Vs merit: ideological fight behind ouster of Harvard’s Claudine Gay. India quota debate parallel" video.

  1. A good recall. I wonder why give a seemingly clean chit to Ms Gay. I sat through the congress deposition live On TV. It is abundantly clear from the deposition that all three Presidents, did not admit that call for genocide is abhor able even though it was evident they were aware. She also said that the words become abhor able only when it turns to action. On this when Gay was asked if she will take notice only on occurrence of genocide or words to that effect, she floundered and still did not condemn the call for genocide. She was abundantly aware of what she was saying I watched it, all,of it. Tailpiece: Now Ms Gay is just trying to redeem something out of it all, by the left - right and other such arguments. Let us not fall for it. Unfortunately we carry and profess wrong aspects of liberalism which is not good for liberalism. Just saying.
    84
  2. I agree, NYT has a reputation. But don’t get carried away, its views ARE prejudiced. Let us not ignore that.
    2