Comments by "Beau R" (@beaur252) on "Russian Army's 'Deadlier' New Line Of Ammunition Based On 'NATO Trophies' | Watch" video.

  1. So russia has no excuse, when will this three day "special operation" end? According to your post, should be no later than tomorrow, right? Bahahaha
    2
  2. At least you are able to admit russia is 50 years behind nato. Judging by other peoples comments, you arr coping with russia losing their 3 day war a little better than some. Hahahaha
    2
  3. Afghanistan and ukraine says hold my beer...
    2
  4. Yes it is an advantage russia has more men and more equipment than poor ukraine...yet theyre still losing.. hahahaha.
    2
  5. They have plenty of space to fill in those musrums, where their 80 year old tanks used to be... the old relic tanks they removed from their museums for battle field use because all their new ones had turrets flying 50 feet in the air and smoke pouring out barrels? Hahaha
    2
  6.  @gordhammond7105  yes held in high regard... equipment that US used when they saved USSR from extinction in WW2
    2
  7. Hilarious seeing it admitted that nato stuff is better and russian stuff is junk. Nato isnt changing their equipment based on russian "tropies" because theyre all junk. Lol
    2
  8. They didnt fler, they left after 2p years when they wanted to. They left the gear because it was cheaper than hauling all that hard desert used 20 + year old junk back home.
    2
  9. Not if they each gave less than 1% of their military capability, and some giving only humanitarian support. As is thd case with ukraine donors Besides, one of those countries supplying iraq would not have been the US... because thats who they were fighting and who has by far the best toys in the world. Nothing on earth could have drlivered a victory for iraq. The gap in power between the two is far too great.
    2