Comments by "Beau R" (@beaur252) on "US to deploy 'nuclear strategic bomber' in China's backyard? Tensions escalate in the Asia-Pacific" video.

  1.  @655superblues  Ukraine has THIRD RATE nato equipment... The tanks have been downgraded, so as not to include latest and most technical features and armor. They arent getting any of the jets and even if they ever do, it will be the fourth or fifth best stuff in the F16s. They have gotten no long or mid range missiles, no cluster bombs, and absolutely no naval support.... Along with a whole host of other stuff... Greatly outnumbered soldiers are fighting the war with severely downgraded arsenal, in the hands of a not very well trained military (compared to nato) and it is still good enough to fight RUssia and winning or at worst, a draw so far. lol:face-green-smiling:
    3
  2. No need. We all know how this ends. Not good for little fat kim.
    2
  3. Criminals never do like the police.
    2
  4. THe little fathead prik thats been flinging missiles around asia, and making hollow threats steadily for the last several years.
    2
  5. Good job U.S. Keep that little square headed punk in his place! At the bottom!
    2
  6. If you had even half a brain, you would understand that he is doing his best to bluff so he doesnt get steam-rolled by america.
    2
  7.  @joem0088  Russia isnt even a concern. Ukraine is neutralizing them just fine. Nato wont have to deal with them for a long long time. ha ha ha.:face-purple-crying:
    2
  8. Brics isnt a militarly alliance. Merely a convenient economy based relationship. WHen it comes to defense or military, the countries involved dont like each other enough or trust each other. Every one of the nations are pretty much on their own. lol Rejects from the international community, including from each other. ha ha ha
    2
  9.  @JDDC-tq7qm  Oh you poor poor ignorant fool. ha ha ha. VIetnam ; 58000 US troops dead. Vietcong 1.1 MILLION with an "M"...dead... Yeah, US really got taken out behind the woodshed on that one. ha ha ha. Afghanistan? They were destroyed in a week and ran and hid for 20 years while US held the country. ha ha ha. Only 3 thousand Us lifes lost during that entire time. If those are losses, then I dont ever want America to "win" ha ha ha. Cuba? ha ha ha. Thats a new one Ive never heard mentioned once EVER. No need to even address. :face-green-smiling: Hope that clears up your confusion kid. Now lay off the dope, and stay in school!
    2
  10. Drama queen. 👑
    1
  11.  @jamesgreen1116  I guess vietnam was a loss since US lost 58000 men and vietcong lost 1.1 MILLION. ha ha And afghanstant, US lost 3,000 in TWENTY years they held the country under control ha ha. In fact i dont recall even one military loss by the US.... Iraq was totally one sided... On the other hand, Russia lost 17,000 men (compared to us 3000 fighting same country later) and got run out of Afghanistan. lol They also were nearly extinct during the ww2. Until america got involved and saved them. over 20 million russians dead. ha ha. I think your memory is foggy and were thinking of Russia. Russia also lost to french and Japan...
    1
  12.  @655superblues  Never lost one. And they rarely ever fight alone. They dont have to. They have friends. And they only usually commit a small portion of their forces because of that. lol. Others are stationed at home and all around the globe.
    1
  13. North Korea. And the others are the usual suspects. China. Russia...
    1