Comments by "Lol asdm" (@lolasdm6959) on "China's DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile" video.

  1. Buddy how long do you think Talibans will hold up if the US just use nukes?
    2
  2. Why are they Russian tech? Russian hypersonic missiles do not even have gliding characteristics.
    1
  3. @Hanwen Liu Russia definitely need such kind of weapons. NATO and the US also have high value targets. Russia has been developing hypersonic missiles, although theirs doesn't have a gilding capbility. Russia is going to be on the decline, they can't even afford to upkeep majority of their tank fleet, or to replace aging ships with new ones, hence why most of their larger ships require a tug boat for mobility.
    1
  4.  @santannamv  "Nowadays the only thing Russia have is the most powerful military force on this planet." Yeah the most powerful military doesn't even get it's larger ships to move without tug boats. China can't innovate? Lmao China just got an actual 5th generation jet into service, the Russian Su-57 still isn't a 5th generation jet. Chinese DF-17 has gliding capabilities, Russian counterparts doesn't, China has it's own Beidou system to rival the GPS, Russia has no such system. The US doesn't even have a 6th generation jet functioning, do you understand what is a 5th and 6th generation jet? THERE ARE NO 6th GENERATION JETS THAT EXISTS NOW. China is not a good match for Russia, China has no allies, similarly Russia's allies are the Russian army and the Russian navy. To build a formidable military without the economy of a modern country is delusional. For example, Texas, has the same GDP as all of Russia, or in China, where Guangdong has a larger GDP than Russia.
    1
  5.  @flarearlgrandejioral4137  Why, are the Afgans going to retaliate? Or someone is going to nuke the US? It will be poor diplomacy at most.
    1