Comments by "suraj s" (@surajs5913) on "'BJP doesn’t have a patent on Lord Ram' — Congress’ 'Hanuman' pitted against Shivraj in MP's Budhni" video.

  1. People remember congress govt was the one who said that there is no archeological evidence of Ram in supreme court. BJP have no patent on Bhagavan but congress has no right to talk...
    9
  2.  @wrongenglish1  there is archeological evidence that the contested site was a hindu temple for millenia before the babri masjid was constructed . If you want archeological evidence of Ram, that is irrelevant to the fundamental argument in question as there is no archeological evidence of tge existence of mohamed , jesus or even alexander. However there is archeological evidence and historical literary evidence of a hindu temple revered by the masses of hindus on the site of the babri masjid. The congress party did not care about that historic fact or the aspirations of the hindu populace - due to which they tried to mislead the court to base the judgement on a point of reasoning that was irrelevant to the case - and for that reason they will be eternally remembered for their role in denying the right to religion of hindus and in trying to erase the memory of Bhagwan Ram (thereby spreading ignorance and adharma in the world)...
    1