Comments by "suraj s" (@surajs5913) on "'Reservations should continue till there is discrimination', says RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat" video.

Lol udayanidhi stalin is a puppet of anti hindu forces.For him only caste discrimination is "sanatan". In reality caste discrimination is not a sanatan aspect of even hinduism - best example is even in vedas as seen in the below text - “I am a reciter of hymns, my father is a healer, my mother a grinder of corn. We desire to obtain wealth through various actions”-- Rig Veda 9.112.3 Even karunanidhi used to do surya namaskar which was derived from sanatan dharma as a way of worshippong the Sun, but people like udayanidhi will say all the good aspects derived from sanatan dharma are secular and not rooted in the hindu religion but all the bad aspects derived from same sanatan dharma are essential aspects of hindu religion - they will say that hindubreligion is nothing but the bad aspects derived from sanatan dharma philosophy and will call for the eradication of the philosophy. Even the 3 books of thirukkural talk about aram(virtue), porul(wealth) and inbam(love) aimed at acheiving veedu(liberation) - that is the exact philosophy of sanatan dharma of pursuing dharma(virtue), artha(wealth) and kama(love) to acheive moksha(liberation)... but the anti hindu dravidian forces will only misuse the name of thirukkural and not spread its message because the message is the message of sanatanam...
2
@vvnv9308 first of all the religion of India based on the vedas were always called "sanatana dharma" by its followers. Due to various historical reasons it came to be known as hindu religon, jusy because you gave it a name "sindhu religion", that doesnt change anything. Secondly the behaviour of pandavas to karna is not the essense of sanatana dharma - the pandavas also gambled but gambling is not a teaching of sanatana dharma. In fact the only part of the mahabharata that can be said to be the essense of sanatana dharma is the Bhagavad Gita - because it is explicitly stated that the Gita is the word of Bhagawan for humans to live in the kali yuga. Thirdly if karna was discriminated on basis of birth then how did he qualify to compete for marrying draupadi just because duryodhana gave the kingdom of Anga to karna? If caste was birth based then gaining the kingdom of Anga would not have changed the qualifications of karna... But give more examples, every lie will be exposed....
1
@vvnv9308 also if the logic is that there was no hindu, there were only shaivite, vaishnavite, smartas, etc., then by same logic there was no tamil nadu but only cholas, cheras and pandyas. If you are going to cite some literature to justify existence of tamil identity then i can also cite otherbliterature to justify existence of "sanatana dharma" identity. Each and every trick used by you against "sanatana dharma" can also be used against dravidian ideology. In fact dravidian ideology is more fundamentelist and toxic than the worst form of hindu supremacy...
1