Comments by "suraj s" (@surajs5913) on "Why mosques in rear view mirror, like Kashi’s Gyanvapi, can crash India’s drive into future" video.

Why settle for 2 when you can have 50000? Bro civilisations are rebuilt by struggle, not by reconciliation...
11
Its mandal vs mandir politics my friend. I would hope mandir prevails over mandal. Otherwise indian civilisation will be destroyed.
8
Dont worry it will end in a few generations
4
@parththeviking if the buddhists demand the same, let the ASI conduct a survey and the site will be returned to the community. Can you say the same about Kashi and Mathura?
3
@parththeviking and now the british are gone and nothing stops the muslim community to respect the customs and sentiments of the hindu community. Muslims can learn and know that the location of a temple is divine to hindus especially in cases like kashi vishwanath and krishna janmanbhoomi. But mosques have no such demand for specific location, they just have to face mecca. Muslims need not atone for the sins of their ancestors. But muslims can strengthen communal harmony by understanding and respecting the sentiments of hindus. You who tell others to not keep looking to the past still argue based on colonial attempts to divide india in an attempt to demonize hindu organisations. Is this not looking into the past to judge the present generation? Would you judge the descendants of the razakars based on the violence they wrecked during the annexation of hyderabad? Why are you so selective in looking back at history? Are you eve aware of how hypocritical you look?
2
@soumenghosh31 please tell the jihadists and the rabid missionariea about secularism while you are at it
2
@soumenghosh31 i am sure they already know, but you can tell them whatever you want. At least they won't behead you...
2
@soumenghosh31 you can fart theories out of your ass as much as you want... i dont care about your opinion and vilification. It means less than nothing...
2
People who are working on todays problem are also working in historical problems. The existence of today's problems are no excuse for ignoring any of the problems of the past or future. That has been the norm of indian politics since independence, right from mandal commission (solving past problems based on a 1930 census data) to ISRO (solving future problems in a third world country) The issue is not about historical.problems, but problems that are inconvenient to some who want to sideline such longstanding issues.
1
Why should we bury history of islamic invasion and not bury history of caste discrimination? Why do you want to use history only as a tool of shaping society to your vision of an ideal modern society? Why are you afraid of truth in a country whose motto is "satyameva jayate"?
1
A real moral travesty would be to claim that there were no hindu religious structure beneath such mosques. A real moral travesty would be to claim in your national educational system that aurangezeb gave money to rebuild temples. But apparently all of the lies and fabricated history is all ok, only truth is a travesty of morality. Do you even know what "satyameva jayate" means? Look it up, its part of the national spirit and national identity.
1
"Settling down"
1
@jojobabok9373 say it like it is instead of watering it down in journalistic jargon. Otherwise 'satyameva jayate ' shoupd be replaced with a more fitting slogan
1