Comments by "suraj s" (@surajs5913) on "Justice Pardiwala says 'media trials are not healthy for rule of law'" video.

Islam has blasphemy and judiciary has contempt of court. The people in these institutions may have been born in Bharat but these institutions are foreign to Bharat. "the righteous have nothing to fear" does not apply to themselves but applies to everyone else.
43
The judiciary is answerable only to the constitution, the same constitution that they have the monopoly to interpret - in such a arbitrary manner that the basicstructure doctrine has been defined for decades but the judiciary is yet to define which all articles and clauses constitute said basic structure. The only modern analogy that is more farcical than this is maulanas saying they are answerable only to their alla and qoran, the same qoran that they have a monopoly to interpret and issue fatwas. The parallels are chilling...
30
@himanshusaurabh7001 explain how if you can....
3
@bsp3615 the core and tested principles enshrined in our culture state that it is our Dharma to fight nonetheless - to not worry about the result but do our Dharma without hope or fear. Those who remember that and those who learn it anew will continue fighting for what is right.
2
@himanshusaurabh7001 islamic law is not the whim of one man either, its a closed system containing hundreds of interpretations of the same fundamental text (the quran) over which many generations of maulanas have debated, argued and written commentaries upon. Thats how you have various schools of islamic thought. The fact remains that these maulanas are answerable to no one except the quran, just as the judiciary claims to be answerable to no one except the constitution. The question is not of application of logic or the hard work required to do so. The question is not of application of mind or the resources required but of accountability. The judiciary is a circular system that has declared itself immune to any scrutiny by the people (the same people mentioned in the Preamble) of India, holding itself accountable to a text that it alone has a right to interpret. The parllel with islamic legal systems remains valid in this case despite your arguments. Do try again though, i have always lived on the strength of my arguments rather than taking refuge behind any person or ideology. Sanity, reason and common sense would demand that the judiciary would do the same, instead of hiding behind the constitution when there is no rationality or common sense in their position.
2
@bsp3615 such a system is unnatural. If India survives for centuries to come, this stagnation alone will keep India back from progressing.
1
@himanshusaurabh7001 i am certainly interested in islamic texts because i am interested in everything. These texts are the reason so many problems have arisen out of islam. Studying them is not an obsession but a necessity in modern times to solve the problem of islam. Pandits should not have a monopoly ver the interpretation of religious texts. Anyone who has read the sacred texts of hindus and understood them and knew the same. Meanwhile hindus know thqt any parellel to sharia law like the manusmriti is impractical and u git for today age - even the original version of manusmriti os debatable since there are so many versions. Hindus therefore use their brains instead Meanwhile muslims consider mohamed as their ideal man, a 6th century warlord is their ultimate aspiration. And the great judiciary allows them to harbour such fantasies, allowing only muslim men to have 4 wives. That is the sorry state of Indian secularism. The deliberation and debates of the constitution was done by long dead men. The world has changes since then. Yet this same judiciary defines "basic structure" doctrine without defining what the basic structure - which all articles constitute the basic structure of the constitution is... this arbitrariness and i flexibility is only comparable to similar mentalities in islamic law, where the validity of hadiths are determined by political considerations rather than historicity. Islam iis a sham and so is the judiciary. Sorry fot the late reply, it seems i didnt get a notification...
1