Comments by "Stephen Jon" (@stephenjon3502) on "'The supremacy of EU law is ending in the UK': Catherine McBride analyses the extent of Brexit" video.

  1. Brown people in boats. That’s not me but most of Brexiteers. The rest were worried about sovereignty and the shape of bananas.
    2
  2.  @Tess_Tickal Obviously you don’t run any form of business Tess. I’d say best not to try either.
    1
  3.  @Tess_Tickal Imagine if the UK followed your order of not trading with any country in the EU. Maybe you think you are a patriot. You are the complete opposite. It’s a shame that people with your blinkered mindset are allowed to vote, one reason the UK is knackered.
    1
  4.  @dragani2330  Illegal immigration doesn’t exist. You can keep passing on Bravermans gaslight waffle but nothing exists like that in international law. You would’ve thought a qualified barrister would have sussed that one.
    1
  5.  @iluv2b  The will of the people ? Only 38% bothered to vote. Another load of gaslit shite.
    1
  6.  @iluv2b  Immigration ( not illegal as doesn’t exist ) has got worse thanks to your “ will of the people” 52% of the 38% that voted put a X in the wrong box making the UK a third country. We had more ways of refusing or sending anyone that entered in the EU. You and your people need to accept that you either were too thick to realise you were being gaslit or couldn’t be bothered to read the rules properly…
    1
  7. ⁠ @dragani2330 I’ve travelled the world sausage. What part of my comment did you not understand? Did me mentioning the word “illegal” trigger you?
    1
  8. ⁠ @dragani2330 AND yes, if I turned up anywhere and told them I was there to claim asylum from persecution from thick doughnuts on Youtube they would have to process me. I would not be deemed “ illegal “ unless processed accordingly. Suggest you have a read of the 1951 refugee convention chum. You might actually learn something.
    1
  9. ⁠​⁠ @dragani2330 You are still waffling about “ illegal” immigration. It simply does not exist in international law. I’m sorry that doesn’t fit in your braverman soaked noodle but can you tell me how many of the people seeking asylum have been arrested for being “ illegal”? I will give you a clue - none. Did the 5 high court judges ruling against the bill not convince your confused noggin? To use your term - that’s ok. Please take a read of the 1951 refugee convention from the UNHCR. I think you are the one that’s struggling with the complex rules of immigration. That’s because you won’t accept that people have the right to apply for asylum whenever and wherever they want. I’m surprised you’ve not mentioned the safe country bollox as most Daily Fail readers tend to. Complete sausage.
    1
  10. Oh dear. Did you complain over my reply to get it removed? Poor lad.
    1
  11. Use your noggin David rather than following the narrative as one day something may happen when you need them. Just ask Tommy…
    1
  12.  @boofuu3145  Citation please. The official figures show Polands economy to surpass the UKs by 2030. Stop looking on Face book
    1
  13. That was the promise and like most things promised in leaving the EU they never happened.
    1
  14.  @michaelbailey8729  Yea, let’s have another posh multimillionaire who made more money after gaslighting people to vote to tank the economy take over and then making us even poorer by privatising the NHS & closing more small businesses by bringing in WTO rules. 🍩
    1
  15.  @michaelbailey8729 Not hard enough for you? Let’s have 60% tariffs on everything. 🙄
    1
  16. ⁠​⁠ @daryllportas8453 Our own HRA is linked to the ECHR which is just another layer of protection for its members. Our own rights act means we can listen to cases in domestic courts rather than going to europe. As our own HRA is linked to the ECHR it would be madness to get rid of it, especially as we were one of the main signatories. This also saves time and money. People following the narrative of getting rid of the ECHR often don’t understand the implications of leaving it, an example would be a certain bloke from Luton who often kicked off about it in regards to people coming here in boats then complaining that his own rights has been breached after getting arrested for doing fk all!
    1
  17. Ask Tim Martin why as such as patriot he doesn’t stock English wines and he will tell you that’s it because of the cost of them.
    1
  18. ⁠ @joancooley1387 Ask any farmer who has lost their EU subsidy. Go to poorer areas like Stoke where boot boy Gullis told everyone to leave the EU. They lost EU funding (178 million) but the Tories have given them a mere 11million to “ level up” Take a swim in our seas or rivers now they are full of waste. Have you tried to get seen at the Drs now days? Of course it was nothing to do with getting rid of nearly 50,000 NHS staff back to europe after the referendum just all to do with Covid/Ukraine. Maybe the added bonus of paying up to 60% for Your shopping is ok as you might be fortune enough to be one of these mortgage free pensioners that don’t have any worries. Or did you celebrate when your holiday pound dropped from 1.48 to 1.21 over night then and now struggles to go over 1.17? Could go on but I think your head is well and truly stuck in the sand.
    1
  19. Yes, let’s give up our human rights. Very clever..
    1
  20.  @colinmartin2921 Not really If you look at the forecast for 24. UK growth predicted to be 0.5% with Germany at 0.6% If you read the Mail then they came out with the UK at 5%😂
    1
  21.  @colinmartin2921 Not forgetting that being in the EU the poorer parts of Germany benefit from EU subsidies. Areas like Stoke in the UK used to get nearly 180m and now they don’t but the Tories gave them a mere 11m then called it “ levelling up”
    1