Comments by "M. R" (@m.r4841) on "" video.

  1. There is no god
    5
  2. She was intentionally putting innocent lives in danger by driving while being drunk.
    4
  3. She intentionally put innocents in danger and killed three innocent people. She knew what she was doing is wrong and illegal and highly dangerous.
    3
  4.  @nad1ax2  3 people are dead. They are forever gone only became she decided that the laws don't apply to her and she can put innocents bystanders in danger.
    3
  5. Do whatever you want. But don't tell others what to do! Alcohol is a personal choice. Alcohol must not be banned.
    3
  6. It can't happen to anyone. It happened because she decided to drive while being drunk. She knew what she was doing is wrong and illegal and highly dangerous. It was a conscious and deliberate decision to put innocents in danger.
    3
  7. No
    3
  8. Another reason why the Islam is bad
    2
  9. Just think about how many lives she has willingly ruined and ended
    2
  10. She was intentionally putting innocent lives in danger. She knew what she was doing is wrong and illegal and highly dangerous. She did drive on purpose while knowing that it is extremely dangerous. That was a conscious and deliberate decision
    2
  11. Why would you want to be forgiven if you didn't do anything wrong
    2
  12. It's not too much. She killed an entire family.
    2
  13. It's her fault.
    2
  14. It is long but it's fair for taking 3 innocent lives.
    2
  15. 50 years sounds fair for killing 3 innocent people
    2
  16.  @jazzytimes2373  He was racing with a speed of over 100 mph through a residential area. He accepted the possibility of killing someone when he decided to do an highly dangerous and illegal street race. It was a conscious and deliberate decision to put innocents in danger. If he didn't want to hurt anyone he shouldn't have broken the law by doing something highly dangerous and illegal. As simple as that. He willingly killed two people.
    2
  17. Another reason why the Islam is bad
    2
  18.  @gabolujan3109  my last comment was sarcastic
    2
  19. Killing 3 innocent people was a bit much.
    2
  20.  @gabolujan3109  Sure
    2
  21.  @filsdejeannoir1776  If she had not intention to harm anyone she should not have been driving while being drunk. She knew what she was doing is wrong and illegal and highly dangerous. He accepted the possibility of killing someone when she decided to drive a car. Every little child knows don't drink and drive. It was a conscious and deliberate decision to put innocents in danger.
    2
  22. Great judge. She killed an entire family.
    2
  23. She killed 3 innocent people.
    2
  24. For killing 3 people 50 years sounds fine to me.
    2
  25. 50 years sounds about right for killing 3 innocent people.
    2
  26. Because there is nothing wrong with alcohol as long as you drink responsibly. What's not to understand? It's a personal choice
    2
  27. But she intended to drive while being drunk. That was a conscious and deliberate decision.
    2
  28.  @XenoTronusWeePoo850  Many things are dangerous. But it's a personal choice. Be consequent. If we ban alcohol we must also ban cigarettes, sugary drinks, fast food and basically everything else that is dangerous for you.
    1
  29. She killed 3 people
    1
  30.  @benjaminbingaman1848  Exactly
    1
  31. It's unlikely that she even lives so long considering the average lifespan in the US is 73.
    1
  32. You are delusional
    1
  33. Yes, but most of the time they're justified. In this case she selfishly and recklessly killed 3 innocent people.
    1
  34. This is not an accident. She knew what she was doing is wrong and illegal and highly dangerous. She intentionally put innocents in danger
    1
  35.  @mikezentack3723  I never did. And if I would then I'm fully responsible for my actions. And she's fully responsible for her actions.
    1
  36. This is a life sentence
    1
  37. What is wrong with you
    1
  38. It is justice. 50 years for killing 3 sounds about right
    1
  39.  @andrewgreatness6936  You do realize that she has killed 3 people
    1
  40. How?
    1
  41. It's not pointless
    1
  42.  @ghonbon6341  She just killed 3 innocent people and you say she's not dangerous
    1
  43. Can you ensure that she won't do it again?
    1
  44.  @ghonbon6341  I never did anything wrong and she has literally killed 3 people. Do you see the difference?
    1
  45.  @ghonbon6341  That's pure speculation. Anyway, 50 years are more than fair for brutally killing 3 people and destroying an entire family.
    1
  46.  @ghonbon6341  Punishment is an important part justice. You're only considering whether or not someone is still a danger for society. That logic is simply wrong. Let's say I'm a serial killer but I only killed 9 people who wronged me in the past and now I'm done with it. I won't kill anyone else. I say that killer should be in prison for his crimes but your logic says that serial killer should be free because he's not a danger anymore.
    1
  47.  @ghonbon6341  I'm just showing the flaws of your argument.
    1
  48.  @ghonbon6341  That is not true. She intended to drive while being drunk. That was a conscious and deliberate decision. A car is not a toy. That's not different than shooting a gun.
    1
  49.  @nad1ax2  She knew the law. She knew that what she did is illegal and dangerous. She just didn't care.
    1
  50.  @stuartsturgess2199  She knew the dangers and risks. Everyone in the world knows how dangerous it is.
    1
  51. There is no god
    1
  52. What is wrong with you
    1
  53. Absolutely not
    1
  54. So? Sounds fair.
    1
  55.  @Jerae090889  Killing 3 people is much more severe than killing only one person. Killing 1 person = 22 years. Killing 3 people = 50 years. Sounds fair to me.
    1
  56. It's a personal choice. If you drink responsible there nothing wrong with it. But if you want to ban alcohol then be consequent and ban sugary drinks, unhealthy food and while we're at it everything else that is bad for you.
    1
  57.  @nare8888  When we're looking at it long-termed I think that obesity is more dangerous and kills more people than traffic accident due to alcohol. But I still wouldn't ban any of it. I believe in personal choice. When you consume responsibly there is nothing wrong. Banning those things would be unfair to those people who who how to properly consume. And the US already tried to ban alcohol. It didn't turn out good.
    1
  58. Absolutely not
    1
  59. Never!!
    1
  60. It depends if it's your fault
    1
  61. 🤣🤣
    1
  62. She killed 3 people
    1
  63. Another reason why religion is bad
    1
  64.  @nad1ax2  If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. She knew exactly what she was doing. He knew the risks.
    1
  65. Nah, not for killing 3 innocent people.
    1
  66. Another reason why the Islam is bad
    1
  67. You are wrong. It was an intentional crime. She knew what she was doing is wrong and illegal and highly dangerous. She accepted the possibility of killing someone when she decided to drive while being drunk. She knew the dangers and the consequences and risks.
    1
  68. Another reason why Islam is bad
    1
  69. Sure. Because it's that easy to break them and then steal a gun 🤣
    1
  70. You are sick
    1
  71. Once your entire family is brutally killed you can talk.
    1
  72.  @iCyberZombie1  I'm not harming others when I drink alcohol. You know that you can drink responsibly, right ?
    1
  73. There is no god
    1
  74.  @gabolujan3109  He is not
    1
  75. 50 in total
    1
  76. Saying what you have to say is part of the legal system.
    1
  77. That is one of the stupidest comments I have ever seen
    1
  78.  @andrewbetrix  I agree. You must accept the fact that your comment is nonsensical.
    1
  79.  @andrewbetrix  Again, I agree. Therefore you can't stay in denial forever.
    1
  80. Why would it not be? The US already tried banning it. It failed miserably.
    1
  81. You mistake soften with civilized.
    1
  82. Good
    1
  83. Cameron got 24 years and it's not the same thing
    1
  84. You are in no position to talk until your entire family has been brutally killed.
    1
  85. Well she is a killer
    1
  86. Hast du gerade unironisch das Wort Nazimäßig benutzt
    1
  87. You don't know what you're talking about
    1
  88.  @wonkygustav4457  That's see point. You don't know who's responsible and who isn't until it's too late.
    1
  89.  @steveessig6739  Every little child knows don't drink and drive. She knew exactly what she was doing is wrong and illegal and highly dangerous. She just didn't care about innocent bystanders. If she really didn't want to hurt anyone then she shouldn't have driven while being drunk. It was a conscious and deliberate decision to put innocents in danger.
    1
  90. She has killed 3 people. Don't forget that
    1
  91. When someone kills your entire family then you talk about selfish people.
    1
  92.  @davidl00006  The world would be a better place without religion and the concept of god.
    1
  93. You are delusional
    1
  94. 50 years for killing 3 people. There's a difference.
    1
  95.  @benjaminbingaman1848  Look at how old she is. Her life is over
    1
  96. That is your opinion. I strongly disagree.
    1
  97. Alcohol is not the problem
    1
  98. It should be scary. It is something to avoid.
    1
  99. Yes, that's democratic.
    1
  100.  @sg4929  You are correct. There is a difference. If she killed those 3 people on purpose she would have gotten a life sentence.
    1
  101. An appropriate sentence
    1
  102. It shouldn't be.
    1
  103. She does
    1
  104. It should not. It's a personal choice
    1
  105. Who cares about Christianity anyway?
    1
  106. Because it's a personal choice
    1
  107.  @bootsarmstrong8421  Maybe. But it's a personal choice nevertheless.
    1
  108. No. It is the right decision
    1
  109.  @Mac-po1sr  But it was a conscious decision. She wasn't too drunk to not know what she was doing.
    1
  110. We're talking about killing 3 innocent people
    1
  111.  @tingtong1196  No
    1
  112. But I admit I made some small trivial offenses in my life. But I have not killed anyone.
    1
  113. No. You can drink responsible.
    1
  114. Wanting revenge is human. She is not evil.
    1
  115.  @Theknightime  We have freedom of speech. Everyone will get the chance to say their part in the court. If she wants to express her anger and wanting revenge that's her right. It's only words after all.
    1
  116. You are sick
    1
  117.  @ironjohn5914  But legal
    1
  118.  @ironjohn5914  It's a personal choice. Many things are bad like sugar, cigarettes, loud music, fast food ect.
    1
  119.  @ironjohn5914  Alcohol has no side effects if you drink responsible.
    1
  120.  @ironjohn5914  It's a personal choice. If I drink responsible then alcohol is not better than water. Both are equally good if you know how to drink.
    1
  121.  @ironjohn5914  The taste. It has natural ingredients.
    1
  122. Every state in the US has different laws and punishments.
    1
  123. It is both.
    1
  124.  @willzamp8914  Yes
    1
  125. This is probably the stupidest comment I have ever seen
    1
  126. Sad country you live in
    1
  127. Such nonsense 🤣
    1
  128. You are sick
    1
  129. There is no god
    1
  130.  @owbeontaylor953  Wisdom and religion don't go hand in hand. The only instructions you must follow are the laws. Nothing else.
    1
  131. It's a personal choice. You can also drink responsibly
    1
  132. I don't blame them
    1
  133. Forgiveness is a private choice. She must still face the justice system.
    1
  134. No
    1
  135. Because if you drink alcohol responsibly nothing bad happens. There is no reason to ban it.
    1
  136.  @ibnamanot  It was already forbidden to drink and drive. How did that work out?
    1
  137.  @ibnamanot  Banning alcohol won't change a thing. History has proven it. Banning it will fail.
    1
  138. No really
    1
  139. You're just human
    1
  140. Because we're not living in the middle ages anyone.
    1
  141. Because she has destroyed many lives and ended three lives. I think that's a good reason.
    1
  142. Of course not
    1
  143. Of course you can blame her
    1
  144.  @Blue-nm9qp  It's already forbidden. The only one who's responsible for her actions is she herself. No one allowed this to happen. She decided to break the law. Stricter laws won't change that.
    1
  145. No
    1
  146.  @jkxqpg2604  She knew the dangers and the consequences and risks of her actions.
    1
  147. Because it's a personal choice. There is nothing wrong with alcohol as long as you drink responsibly.
    1
  148. What about cigarettes, sugary drinks, fast food, loud music?
    1
  149. But killing must have consequences. We can't live in a lawless world.
    1
  150.  @j0ellyfish  Does she look like she prefers it?
    1
  151. When you're already between 20 and 30 years old it is a life sentence
    1
  152. It sounds about for killing innocent people
    1
  153. She was intentionally putting innocent lives in danger by driving while being drunk.
    1
  154. Shut up
    1
  155. Why? She killed 3 people
    1
  156. Once your entire family has been brutally killed you can talk about forgiveness. It's easy to judge other people in a safe environment.
    1
  157. 50 years sounds about right for killing 3 people
    1
  158.  @PROD.ELIJD360  She knew what she was doing is wrong and illegal and highly dangerous. She accepted the possibility of killing someone when she decided to drive while being drunk. That was a conscious and deliberate decision to put innocents in danger. She knew the risks and consequences.
    1
  159. No. She killed an entire family.
    1
  160. Ok then. Let's release every prisoner and let's get rid of the concept of prison as well. The crime is done and can't be changed so what's the point in locking criminals up. That is pretty much what you said.
    1