Comments by "dangerouslytalented" (@dangerouslytalented) on "GOP Faithful Want Obama Impeached, Why? He's Obama, That's Why" video.

  1. I would like to see the actual wording of the survey and the methodology, it sounds fishy.
    17
  2. cmatrix4761 Even if you know how it is supposed to work, it's not how it actually ends up working... Nobody actually talks for hours on end, unless they are actually doing a stunt. You don't HAVE to talk on end, you just have to declare "I filibuster this" and whoops the whole thing is taken as read that you filibutstered it. 
    1
  3. Lord Kiltridge which ones?
    1
  4. Lord Kiltridge You expect me to watch a whole half hour video? Can't you just list just a few of the most pertinent, the ones that prove your point best? Surely one has to leap out at you.
    1
  5. Lord Kiltridge you are not giving me any palatable red pills that are convincing enough. You are not giving me any red pills at all. You are simply telling me that the red pills are out there. So give me the reddest pill at all, and I can examine it and see whether it has anything in it worthwhile.
    1
  6. Lord Kiltridge no, you gave me a half an hour worth of video. Too much for me to swallow. I don't have the time to watch every single half hour video that every conspiracy theory salesman has to show me. And that you expect me to SWALLOW IT WHOLE is quite frankly astounding. Just go to YOUR source without allowing me to go to anywhere else to see if the facts confirm themselves? Why would I do that? Why would I swallow a red pill when I don't know what's in it at all?
    1
  7. Lord Kiltridge But it is still half an hour long. And their references point to where? Only the stuff that backs their own stuff up. Anything inconsistant with their narrative is discarded. So you are not going to tell me any of them, and get me to research it on my own? Because you are simply giving it out as a package and expecting me to swallow it whole, just like, and I quote, "a red pill". Who do you think you are, Bill Cosby? I am not swallowing anything unless I know what's in there.
    1
  8. technically, it was for lying about fellatio...
    1
  9. genie0390 They put him on oath, and he was asked a question that was  basically entrapment, about an event that while not illegal, would have put him into trouble with his wife, and he responded with a cheese paring half truth, which was eagerly interpreted as a lie, so they impeached him on that... AND FOUND HIM NOT FUCKING GUILTY.
    1
  10. Supernova Kasprzak No, impeachment is simply putting him on trial. That's what impeachment is. A "not guilty" means "not guilty"  A "guilty" verdict would have meant he would have been removed from office and imprisoned.
    1
  11. no, the senate acquitted him.  That means NOT GUILTY.
    1