Comments by "" (@Hobbes746) on "Apollo 11 Press Conference" video.

  1. They have been telling the truth from the beginning: the Apollo landings are real. This is supported by a ton of evidence from many different sources.
    3
  2. Nope, the Apollo missions are verifiable reality.
    3
  3.  @narajuna  1. Start with the data supplied by the missions themselves. Ever since the missions, people all over the world have analyzed the photos and videos. Nobody’s found evidence of fakery. It’s not hard to e.g. measure how objects move in the Apollo videos. When you do that, you’ll find those videos were recorded in 1/6 g gravity, and in a vacuum. We cannot replicate 1/6 g on Earth, which proves those videos were not recorded on Earth. 2. Find the third party observations of the Apollo missions: astronomers and radio amateurs followed the missions and were able to verify that they went to the moon, instead of orbiting Earth. 3. Lunar orbiters made by 3 different countries have taken photos of the Apollo landing sites. you can compare these photos to the Apollo photos to see if they match. 4. If you have access to a powerful laser, you can ping the laser reflectors left by the Apollo missions.
    3
  4.  @narajuna  When the data is aligned with the truth of some proposition (or hypothesis), it becomes evidence. And much of the data we have on Apollo is aligned with the truth of the proposition that Apollo missions did land on the moon. As I outlined above, we have evidence that proves the reality of the Apollo missions.
    3
  5. We know what they saw on the moon because they extensively documented everything they saw on photo and video.
    2
  6. Apollo Crater is an impact basin with a diameter of more than 500 km on the far side of the moon, nowhere near any of the Apollo landing sites. It is the intended target for Chang’e 6. If the Chinese can’t find a crater that large, the mission would be in big trouble. In reality though, they’re on track for landing in the basin. So, as usual, you’re not making sense.
    2
  7. ​ @narajuna  Again, you are confused. There is a crater named Apollo on the moon. This is NOT one of the Apollo landing sites! None of the Apollo missions landed anywhere near Apollo crater.
    2
  8. You’re talking about the ionosphere, using the worst possible sources.
    2
  9.  @markriding1267  His family considers Gus’ death an accident, not a murder.
    2
  10.  @narajuna  Still peddling nonsense, I see. Proof IS verifiable reality.
    2
  11.  @NabiKaCartoonBanao  There is no evidence to support that claim.
    1
  12.  @yoskarokuto3553  Verifiable reality. As usual, you have nothing. No evidence to support your claims.
    1
  13. Grissom was the victim of an accident. The conspiracy theory that he was murdered does not hold up to scrutiny.
    1
  14. Bart Sibrel is a charlatan that’s been caught lying on multiple occasions. None of his arguments stand up to scrutiny.
    1
  15. Nope, they were telling the truth.
    1
  16.  @yoskarokuto3553  And yet in all those years, nobody’s presented any evidence that shows the Apollo landings were faked. Every claim to this effect turns out to be a lie, disproven by evidence.
    1