Comments by "Arunabha Ghosh" (@orunabho) on "Contested view of who liberated Bangladesh: fallen heroes, coups, India u0026 Mujib" video.

  1. For India, and other such colonies of Western White Christian nations, the independence came not because of any local drama or dharna. Hitler caused the Western White Christians nations to start eating each other. They called it WW2. In this mutually assured destruction, these colonial powers were economically devastated, their young male population almost vanished, and the only democracy, an erstwhile colony of British Empire came strong against these feudal countries. The USA The another power that came out strong was the Soviets, the USSR. So for all practical purpose, Hitler, USA, USSR lead to the independence of all colonies in Asia and Africa Mohandas was irrelevant. Possibly a Brutish stooge to control the cow people from increasing violent protests, terrorism, asking for freedom.
    1
  2. If Mohandas was a freedom fighter and a threat to British Raj, the Empire would have jailed Mohandas in the cellular Prisons in the Andamans. INC was a social organization started by the British, all populated by Indians who benifitted greatly under the British colonial empire of India. Big time lawyers (practicing in British Raj courts), big buainessmen, ICS, and zamindars All British stooges. Let bot call them freedom fighters. At best politicians, working in harmony with the Empire. So, none were declared as the Enemy of the Empire. While real terrorist type, wantijg to free india by random act of violence were imprisoned in the cellular jail. 6x3 dark isolation chambers in the Andamans.
    1
  3. Plus KGB. USSR and its intelligence wing played a significant role in the creation of Bangladesh. Without USSR, no Bangladesh
    1