Comments by "tblbaby" (@tblbaby) on "Thoughts on the San Bernardino Shooting | DIRECT MESSAGE | Rubin Report" video.
-
4
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
DirtFlyer You realize Islam isn't a race right? lol.
And ... my problem with how black people as a group have been used by Progs isn't a race issue, or limited to black people. It's just that they've been the heaviest target since Democrats lost the efforts to keep them down and went the soft slavery root. Want to see racism? See how Progs treat minority republican candidates or appointees. They are desperate to keep the division powered by a false narrative. Suggesting that somehow the long Republican goal of equal somehow equates to racism. I'm not a Republcian, because they have other issues I have a problem with, but as far as the race issue goes, they are the best Party for people's societal health, by far, because the former Democrats taken over by Progs, are horrendous. Check out the results.
I have a problem with the lies that divide. It's at the core the worst thing that's happening to our country right now. The division. It happens to be what is best for the Progressive Movement. Or as I've long called it, before Dave was ever involved with the Young Turks, Regressive Movement.
My kids are also less white than Obama. Race means nothing to me. I like the Martin Luther King axiom. Not color, character should be basis for judgement. Again, what would be great for the country, bad for the Prog movement.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
SailingSeignior Look into how ISIS was armed. Obama policy armed them while attacking Assad, who was attacking THEM. They got weapons which were in Libya. Obama and company took out Qaddafi in Libya which was running pretty well. Soros was in Libya working for something with Qaddafi that failed right before Obama and others pushed a revolution. Same in Egypt and Soros helped the Muslim Brotherhood to power. Comes to Iranian uprising which is legitimate and against crazies? Obama took a pass and let many die in Iran, who are our extreme enemy. Huge resource for terrorism, and instigators of it.
Something stinks in here someplace. We need to find it and get rid of it. The something that stinks has a face of Obama in the US and a body of very powerful people backing him up, like Soros, Jarrett, basically a US movement which was started and is perpetuated and aided by a world wide movement with people wealthy enough to bribe colleges to the tune of Billions and feel the investment in what we've seen happening in Colleges, is a good one. Same movement that pushed the EU (Soros was big in that too). Same movement that's importing huge numbers of Muslims into EU countries who are causing so much mayhem, rape, murder, torture and death. Funny, it's not being reported in the media world wide until something big all at once happens in France. The cumulative problems going on in Europe from this are much larger than the attacks in France. Just something that could be ignored, like murder numbers in major US cities, with gun control.
Reagan and co did arm Iran, but they armed them against Iraq which was a larger threat. Good or bad? Ehh ... hard to say until things shake out and we know the other influences effects.
Obama and co is arming our enemies. Funding our enemies. Against those who were holding them back from mass murdering non Muslims. IMPORTING OUR ENEMIES. People who say they are our enemies. We shouldn't believe them or what?
1
-
1
-
SailingSeignior right, it's not the believing that makes something true. It's checking things out and following facts, that leads to understanding.
It's not dismissal of things foreign or unwanted that determines their validity.
I'm a true agnostic, and a very curious one. I want to understand, but don't buy anything until I see evidence. No religion, no political party, and I've learned not to trust media. I listen to a lot of media, but to get leads into what I can look into and information to test against verifiable fact. Also strong theories based on patterns of behavior and associations, mo.
You don't know what I'm talking about it seems, but I do.
Black murder rate was par, fact (I hate when people do this, lol). Black populations were targeted for government programs, fact. Being given what's needed in life for no effort has an atrophicational effect (as to ability to compete and survive in the world) on probably any mammal especially, probably to some degree on any animal. This is not a vague theory, and it's usefulness is well known. After the targeting for government programs, to present black murder rate is up 500%, from before it started, fact.
The basis for understanding this was deliberate involved volumes of information and history, but it was. Drugs were pushed into black neighborhoods. Media pushed a theme that would create separation. Uncool to trust or work for "the man". Drugs had an underground following, but they were hyped as cool. Later gang culture hyped as cool, to the point white kids wanted in too. Cultural themes were developed and fostered in entertainment venues. Black liberation theology was invented and millions were pushed into black churches by progressive operations. (billions are being pushed into churches in general right now, Soros is involved). Men were separated from families as a requirement to obtain Welfare.
To ignore some of this as natural phenomena without intelligent source, ok. All of it? With such calculated implementation, when the methods of creating dependent power blocks are so well documented and ingrained in the progressive movement? Naw, it's overwhelming. Read the book Propaganda, read Saul Alinski, Mao, Eugenics and Margaret Sanger. Check up on what purpose Acorn was created for and how they interacted in this. Understand these people who inform the Progressive movement also created the KKK. Read JFK's writings which seemed pretty out there. Understand how JFK switched from blocking Republicans fight for equal rights to embracing it and going against his party and the power behind it.
You can dismiss what you don't understand, it's easy. Repel what you don't want to be true from your mind. It's the path of least resistance. It's what ignorant people have always done when faced with what they don't take the effort to understand.
Do I take your dismissal personally? No, it's normal. I do see you as taking effort to think on some subject though. It's important we see through what is put in front of us, because if we are to have any sort of decent existence power people have collectively must be turned from the manipulation by a few, and focused on reality. Right now that power is being masterfully manipulated. Resources taken and applied back in areas to gain support. Division pushed. Bribery of the public, and it's not just a short term thing. The kind of investment laid out to make this situation work doesn't come without an expected return.
How does importing what Muslims represent fit in? Why all of the lies about what they believe? The world wide media "insanity" to paint them as what they are not? To gain support? It doesn't come from no where does it?
Government gains power from our problems we think we need them to fix. They gain power from division and groups supporting them to push their own agenda against others pushing their agendas. What obstacles do they face? Constitutional restrictions created to fight the natural government corruption, mainly.
How would they get these things that help them accomplished by bringing in trouble? Something that on it's face is extremely stupid? Seems pretty obvious, doesn't it. As does the coordinated efforts world wide, and the players.
Muslims are being imported into Europe and in many areas creating a hellish situation. Committing an extreme amount of rapes. Government that pushed feminism and sensitivity ignores THESE rapes? Very often gang rapes? Brutal degrading disgusting rapes? It seems insane, and media covers for it all over the world. How does this happen?
An indicator in the middle of all this, George Soros. A man who's brought down several countries and caused immeasurable misery. Supports radical gay rights and the fucking sick parades that push division (Tides) ... at the same time supporting and pushing disinfo to cover for mother fuckers pushing gay people off roofs, and burning them alive and all kinds of other vile shit. Why? Pushing open borders, EU, and so many other leverages. He obviously isn't alone, his billions don't amount to a drop in the bucket of what's been spread around to make things work. Where did he get his billions? Who participated with those kinds of resources?
These things don't make sense alone, seem crazy, right? I can tell you, what I'm saying here didn't come from some crazy site, though I've investigated many claims. I'm not someone to believe without solid information. Facts go where they go if you follow. If you don't, it pretty much seems insane.
The NSA building a huge facility in remote Utah ... what could it be? It's a facility to monitor the population, what else could it be? That seemed insane, conspiracy lunacy. But Damn! that's exactly what it is. The crazy shit got real, because we had simple solid proof. Do you think that's the only instance of this type of thing? People look into it and say HEY! others laugh and say it's not credible, it's laughable. That's really how people usually work. It's not something that's missed by people who'd like to control populations.
1
-
SailingSeignior Check out the Chicago death count. This thing in Cali is just a weekend in Chicago. What caused this? What will help? Gun control won't help.
What is the common factor in most murderers in the US? They've been on public assistance. Since this all started and majority of black people were sold out by their leaders, who became millionaires, 500% rise from even par then to now in murder rate. It's even worse than that, because black people not caught up in that parasitical dependency doom don't contribute to the statistic, so it's watered down.
Black lives matter, whipped up by false sense of attack on black people which is made up by the media when it's not statistically supported. The numbers have not gone up, they've reduced. The Prog media machine whipping up unfounded anger (with amazingly consistent timing to election cycles) and lying to do it. Like Travon Martin, picture of 12 year old kid, omission and distortion of facts of the case calculated to cause division and bad blood. Calling Zimmerman a "White Mexican" I mean come on. Their omission of the prosecutorial misconduct in what was a completely groundless prosecution of Zimmerman to push the issue. They fucked up Zimmerman's life, a guy protecting the neighborhood who was attacked by an athletic strong basically adult. A guy Zimmerman could have never chased down. And Michael Brown, The way they handled that. His picture the most innocent looking one they could get. Inflammatory speculation and misleading information about the circumstances. Several police have been targeted and murdered. We know it's because of this inflammation which was deliberately whipped up to divide and keep black people down by dependence and a feeling of persecution, and thus voting Democrat.
Progressives denied the right to self defense in the San Bernardino situation. In almost every mass murder situation we can name. All in gun free zones.
Even French officials admitted the only way they could have cut way down on the murders in France, was if citizens were armed.
Progressives now want to take away means of self defense and bring in 100,000s of unvetted military aged males who follow a book which they see as the perfect word of Allah, which commands complete genocide of all non believers. Also gives exemption from our laws. If we all have no guns and comply with the law (the law abiding will) do you think they will? On their way to 100% genocide?
Progressives have an aversion to empirical information. A love of propaganda. There is a good reason for this. The reality doesn't work for their desired laws and policy. The goal isn't what is stated. I'm talking about the uber Rich calling their shots, and their lap dogs like Obama.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
SailingSeignior If you take a good look into history, I mean real history. Not the history that says there was a time when the enlightened ones were Muslim, because that's a lie, but real history backed up by scientific investigation as much as that's possible. Zionism, culminating in Christianity, was responsible for much of the paradigm shift. Not to mention the belief in going to hell for bein bad.
In many cultures, like American Indian (where actual history defies what we are mainly taught) morality was different and basically only existed among tribe members, much like Islam. They'd cook children on spikes shoved up their asses, alive. They murdered to get what they wanted. They took slaves. Rape of outside women was normal.
I like the standards which were pretty much set up by Zionist sources ... but hell, I grew up around that.
Different upbringing and pervasive behavior around a person really does dictate how people act the vast majority of the time.
I call it bones in the nose, sticks on the dicks syndrome. Everything that is around forming people's perception is seen as normal.
That's kind of the basis of the effectiveness of Propaganda. Freud's nephew Edward Bernays, a progressive, wrote the book. It's about how to control people in groups, how they think and react. Hitler / Goebbels used it to great effect in Nazi Germany. Goebbels loved that book and gave it much credit for his success in getting people to accept what was done to Jews, Gays, and other groups.
I saw you were a little uninformed there, couldn't help myself ;)
1
-
1
-
K. De Metter Atheism is not just the absence of belief. It's an ism. If there were no theism, there would be no atheism. There is no similar involving things that don't exist, because no one would have thought to ism such a non thing.
Atheism is a protest of theism. It's belief in a negative. Practically it's an anti establishment protestation in the form of ism. The Atheists who don't like to admit this fact created new definitions for Atheism to avoid the inherent irrationality, thus hypocrisy (as it is mainly a protest of theistic hypocrisy, displaying like characteristics) of the true position.
If ones position isn't an anti position, and a belief, it's a faith because you can't prove it. If one simply does not believe and is rational about it, agnostic is the correct label, but then they wouldn't run around cherry picking and propagandizing against religion and take a more objective approach in the description of theism.
Now the real about what Atheism really is, as applied by Atheists to Theists. They seek to shame and embarrass Theists. It's become a nasty tudinal group of bullies, a mob mentality hate thing, not just a lack of belief. If that level of judgement is good enough to apply to theists, they should be judged by their own standards, right? Hypocrisy is a negative, right?
I'm not theist, and they often bug me, but I don't use cherry picked dirt and seek to defame them. They are what they are, and I'm rational about their deficits as well as contributions. I have no motive to paint them, or anyone ugly. I'm agnostic, lack of belief is what I've got. I'm nothing like Atheists in action or dogma. I really don't want them being confused with me and my rational philosophy, or me their philosophy of hate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You've come to some rational realizations, which is good. Time for more. There will always be violent people out there. Forcing populations to be defenseless sheep will never be a good thing. Whether it's Muslims who take advantage, governments, criminals, people will never be protected. Not even if you get to the point people are in bondage basically to keep them safe.
Cue, you won't have that kind of mass shooting in Israel, because the people act as their own security. There is nothing crazy about that. It's extremely practical.
When you say "I'd never defend the NRA" it has the quality, the dynamic of a religious precept. In your own paradigm it appears right, but so does killing infidels in a Koran driven paradigm. You can rail against religion all you want, but you're engaged in that level of idiocy when you've got this idea that "of course it's bad for people to defend themselves". Hell no it's not bad. If the people in that conference were armed that wouldn't have gone that way. 43 people were shot, helpless. [There was a woman shooter ... another woman killer not long after Obama taunted Republicans about being wary of women and children in his bigoted idiocy where a women or child can't kill. They sure as hell can.] We don't know exactly how it would have gone down, maybe a person would have been hit by friendly fire, is one or two dead from friendly fire worse than 8-10 more dead because the people were helpless?
What is the alternative to people acting as their own security. More cops? is that better? Less freedom where everyone is treated like a criminal all day every day as they are in the fucking TSA abuse lines? Those idiotic ineffective abuse lines where 90% of weapons tests get through anyway? Israel has better security, and they don't abuse people who are not much of a threat.
I'm calling on you +The Rubin Report ,to toss the irrational ideology which is so apparently (to me) taking the same place in your mind that religion takes in those you see acting like morons. Also, freedoms, you've got to give them to get them. I don't want to be denied the ability to defend myself and those around me. To be left helpless because I follow laws in society, because it's a sure thing those who won't follow those laws won't have too much trouble being armed. I know this because I know weapons and they are easy to create. You can't stop that, and even without guns criminals can plan and devise methods to destroy people because they have the advantage of intent, while in self defense you have to deal with what comes.
If you weren't defended by Israeli weapons there ... the Palestinians would be tossing you off a roof or worse for being gay. I'd never do that, and I'd risk my life to stop it. I'm not Christian, but most of them who carry would do the same.
1